Closes the last gap the review listed, and the one the plan left as optional: no CI job built any experimental module through CMake, so the src/CMakeLists.txt wiring for frost, chilldkg, iceberg, prefractal and frost_enrollment was guarded only by developers running it locally. The plan suggested "adding the experimental modules to one existing CMake job". There are two candidates and they are not equivalent: - win64-native is the only job that RUNS CMake tests, but it builds with MSVC and clang-cl under CFLAGS="/WX". None of the five modules has ever been compiled by MSVC. Turning them on there would be a porting exercise whose first result is a wall of warnings-as-errors from code unrelated to any regression -- and it would land that on four modules this branch does not otherwise touch. - The release job's "Check installation with CMake" step is gcc on Linux, the same compiler and platform where all five are known to build. It configures, builds and installs. The second is where the flags go. It does not run ctest, which is fine: the tests already run under autotools in 45 job contexts. What was unguarded was the WIRING, and this step exercises exactly that -- the SECP256K1_EXPERIMENTAL gate, the dependent-module block ordering, and the PUBLIC_HEADER appends, which the install step then confirms landed by listing the installed tree. Verified that the guard is not decorative. Moving the frost_enrollment block in src/CMakeLists.txt from before the FROST block to after it -- the exact trap the module's commit message describes, where a block that force-enables a dependency runs too late for the block that emits its compile definition -- makes this step fail with undefined references to secp256k1_frost_derive_pubshare_at and friends. Before this change, that mistake reached main with nothing complaining. Also verified the command as written: configure, build and install with all five modules on succeeds on gcc/Linux, the installed include directory carries secp256k1_frost.h, secp256k1_chilldkg.h, secp256k1_iceberg.h, secp256k1_prefractal.h and secp256k1_frost_enrollment.h, and the step's follow-up compile of examples/ecdsa.c against the installed library still links and runs. The workflow parses, and the step really does carry all five module flags plus the experimental gate. This deliberately changes CI coverage for four modules beyond the one this branch adds. It only adds coverage -- no existing job loses anything -- but it is a one-line revert if the wider scope is unwanted. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
c8206b1c b6c2a3cd e7f7083b be5e4f02 5c751833 540fec8a aa2a39c1 8d445730 f9a944ff 2d9137ce 4721e077 471e3a13 ebb35882 1a53f496 c7a52400 ' into temp-merge-1809
c8206b1c b6c2a3cd e7f7083b be5e4f02 5c751833 540fec8a aa2a39c1 8d445730 f9a944ff 2d9137ce 4721e077 471e3a13 ebb35882 1a53f496 c7a52400 ' into temp-merge-1809
libsecp256k1-zkp
A fork of libsecp256k1 with support for advanced and experimental features
Added features:
- Experimental module for ECDSA adaptor signatures.
- Experimental module for ECDSA sign-to-contract.
- Experimental modules for Confidential Assets (Pedersen commitments, range proofs, and surjection proofs).
- Experimental module for address whitelisting.
- Experimental module for Schnorr signature half-aggregation.
- Experimental module for FROST (BIP 445).
- Experimental module for ChillDKG, distributed key generation for FROST (bip-frost-dkg draft).
- Experimental module for Iceberg, a threshold scheme that lets a group of parties stand in for a single MuSig2 (BIP 327) participant.
- Experimental module for Prefractal, a nested FROST+MuSig2 signer that lets a FROST group occupy one participant slot of an ordinary MuSig2 (BIP 327) session.
- Experimental module for FROST enrollment, which grows a (t, n) FROST group into a (t, n+1) one, and repairs a lost share, without re-running key generation.
Experimental features are made available for testing and review by the community. The APIs of these features should not be considered stable.
Build steps
Obtaining and verifying
The git tag for each release (e.g. v0.6.0) is GPG-signed by one of the maintainers.
For a fully verified build of this project, it is recommended to obtain this repository
via git, obtain the GPG keys of the signing maintainer(s), and then verify the release
tag's signature using git.
This can be done with the following steps:
- Obtain the GPG keys listed in SECURITY.md.
- If possible, cross-reference these key IDs with another source controlled by its owner (e.g. social media, personal website). This is to mitigate the unlikely case that incorrect content is being presented by this repository.
- Clone the repository:
git clone https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1 - Check out the latest release tag, e.g.
git checkout v0.7.1 - Use git to verify the GPG signature:
% git tag -v v0.7.1 | grep -C 3 'Good signature' gpg: Signature made Mon 26 Jan 2026 07:42:46 PM UTC gpg: using RSA key 2840EAABF4BC9F0FFD716AFAFBAFCC46DE2D3FE2 gpg: Good signature from "Pieter Wuille <pieter@wuille.net>" [unknown] gpg: aka "Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>" [full] gpg: aka "[jpeg image of size 5996]" [undefined] gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: 133E AC17 9436 F14A 5CF1 B794 860F EB80 4E66 9320 Subkey fingerprint: 2840 EAAB F4BC 9F0F FD71 6AFA FBAF CC46 DE2D 3FE2
Building with Autotools
$ ./autogen.sh # Generate a ./configure script
$ ./configure # Generate a build system
$ make # Run the actual build process
$ make check # Run the test suite
$ sudo make install # Install the library into the system (optional)
To compile optional modules (such as Schnorr signatures), you need to run ./configure with additional flags (such as --enable-module-schnorrsig). Run ./configure --help to see the full list of available flags. For experimental modules, you will also need --enable-experimental as well as a flag for each individual module, e.g. --enable-module-rangeproof.
Building with CMake
To maintain a pristine source tree, CMake encourages to perform an out-of-source build by using a separate dedicated build tree.
Building on POSIX systems
$ cmake -B build # Generate a build system in subdirectory "build"
$ cmake --build build # Run the actual build process
$ ctest --test-dir build # Run the test suite
$ sudo cmake --install build # Install the library into the system (optional)
To compile optional modules (such as Schnorr signatures), you need to run cmake with additional flags (such as -DSECP256K1_ENABLE_MODULE_SCHNORRSIG=ON). Run cmake -B build -LH or ccmake -B build to see the full list of available flags.
Cross compiling
To alleviate issues with cross compiling, preconfigured toolchain files are available in the cmake directory.
For example, to cross compile for Windows:
$ cmake -B build -DCMAKE_TOOLCHAIN_FILE=cmake/x86_64-w64-mingw32.toolchain.cmake
To cross compile for Android with NDK (using NDK's toolchain file, and assuming the ANDROID_NDK_ROOT environment variable has been set):
$ cmake -B build -DCMAKE_TOOLCHAIN_FILE="${ANDROID_NDK_ROOT}/build/cmake/android.toolchain.cmake" -DANDROID_ABI=arm64-v8a -DANDROID_PLATFORM=28
Building on Windows
The following example assumes Visual Studio 2022. Using clang-cl is recommended.
In "Developer Command Prompt for VS 2022":
>cmake -B build -T ClangCL
>cmake --build build --config RelWithDebInfo
Usage examples
Usage examples can be found in the examples directory. To compile them you need to configure with --enable-examples.
- ECDSA example
- Schnorr signatures example
- Deriving a shared secret (ECDH) example
- ElligatorSwift key exchange example
- MuSig2 Schnorr multi-signatures example
To compile the examples, make sure the corresponding modules are enabled.
Benchmark
If configured with --enable-benchmark (which is the default), binaries for benchmarking the libsecp256k1-zkp functions will be present in the root directory after the build.
To print the benchmark result to the command line:
$ ./bench_name
To create a CSV file for the benchmark result :
$ ./bench_name | sed '2d;s/ \{1,\}//g' > bench_name.csv
Reporting a vulnerability
See SECURITY.md
Contributing to libsecp256k1
See CONTRIBUTING.md