The test is supposed to create an invalid sign byte. Before this PR,
the generated sign byte could in fact be valid due to an overflow.
Co-authored-by: Jonas Nick <jonasd.nick@gmail.com>
When configured with `--disable-module-ecdh --enable-module-recovery`, then
`./tests 64 81af32fd7ab8c9cbc2e62a689f642106` fails with
```
src/modules/ellswift/tests_impl.h:396: test condition failed: secp256k1_memcmp_var(share32_bad, share32a, 32) != 0
```
This tests verifies that changing the `party` bit of the
`secp256k1_ellswift_xdh` function results in a different share. However, that's
not the case when the secret keys of both parties are the same and this is
actually what happens in the observed test failure. The keys can be equal in
this test case because they are created by the `random_scalar_order_test`
function whose output is not uniformly random (it's biased towards 0).
This commit restores the assummption that the secret keys differ.
b79ba8aa4c field: Use `restrict` consistently in fe_sqrt (Tim Ruffing)
Pull request description:
That is, use it also in the definition and not only the declaration.
I believe this was the intention of commit
be82bd8e03, but it was omitted there.
edit: Changed the description. I'm not entirely sure but after looking at the standard, I tend to think this is more than a cosmetic change, and only this change actually makes the parameters `restrict`. Anyway, I believe making them `restrict` was simply forgotten in be82bd8e03.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK b79ba8aa4c
Tree-SHA512: eecec7674d8cef7833d50f4041b87241ca8de4839aa8027df1c422b89f5a1bcef3916ac785057a596c459ce1aa9d41e5a21ecb6fed9c5d15a1d9f588c7ee208e
600c5adcd5 clean up in-comment Sage code (refer to secp256k1_params.sage, update to Python3) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Some of the C source files contain contain in-comment Sage code calculating secp256k1 parameters that are already defined in the file secp256k1_params.sage. Replace that by a corresponding load instruction and access the necessary variables. In ecdsa_impl.h, update the comment to use a one-line shell command calling sage to get the values.
The remaining code (test `test_add_neg_y_diff_x` in tests.c) is updated to work with a current version based on Python3 (Sage 9.0+, see https://wiki.sagemath.org/Python3-Switch).
The latter can be seen as a small follow-up to PR #849 (commit 13c88efed0).
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
ACK 600c5adcd5
real-or-random:
ACK 600c5adcd5
Tree-SHA512: a9e52f6afbce65edd9ab14203612c3d423639f450fe8f0d269a3dda04bebefa95b607f7aa0faec864cb78b46d49f281632bb1277118749b7d8613e9f5dcc8f3d
Some of the C source files contain contain in-comment Sage code
calculating secp256k1 parameters that are already defined in the file
secp256k1_params.sage. Replace that by a corresponding load instruction
and access the necessary variables. In ecdsa_impl.h, update the comment
to use a one-line shell command calling sage to get the values.
The remaining code (test `test_add_neg_y_diff_x` in tests.c) is updated
to work with a current version based on Python3 (Sage 9.0+, see
https://wiki.sagemath.org/Python3-Switch).
The latter can be seen as a small follow-up to PR #849 (commit
13c88efed0).
07c0e8b82e group: remove unneeded normalize_weak in `secp256k1_gej_eq_x_var` (Sebastian Falbesoner)
efa76c4bf7 group: remove unneeded normalize_weak in `secp256k1_ge_is_valid_var` (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR removes unneeded normalize_weak calls in two group element functions:
* `secp256k1_ge_is_valid_var`: After calculating the right-hand side of the elliptic curve equation (x^3 + 7), the field element `x3` has a magnitude of 2 (1 as result of `secp256k1_fe_mul`, then increased by 1 due to `secp256k1_fe_add_int`). This is fine for `secp256k1_fe_equal_var`, as the second parameter only requires the magnitude to not exceed 31, and the normalize_weak call is hence not needed and can be dropped. Note that the interface description for `secp256k1_fe_equal` (which also applies to `secp256k1_fe_equal_var`) once stated that _both_ parameters need to have magnitude 1, but that was corrected in commit 7d7d43c6dd.
* `secp256k1_gej_eq_x_var`: By requiring that the input group element's X coordinate (`a->x`) has a magnitude of <= 31, the normalize_weak call and also the field element variable `r2` are not needed anymore and hence can be dropped.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 07c0e8b82e
jonasnick:
ACK 07c0e8b82e
Tree-SHA512: 9037e4af881ce7bf3347414d6da06b99e3d318733ba4f70e8b24d2320c2f26d022144e17bd6b95c1a4ef1be3825a4464e56ce2d2b3ae7bbced04257048832b7f
c6cd2b15a0 ci: Add task for static library on Windows + CMake (Hennadii Stepanov)
020bf69a44 build: Add extensive docs on visibility issues (Tim Ruffing)
0196e8ade1 build: Introduce `SECP256k1_DLL_EXPORT` macro (Hennadii Stepanov)
9f1b1904a3 refactor: Replace `SECP256K1_API_VAR` with `SECP256K1_API` (Hennadii Stepanov)
ae9db95cea build: Introduce `SECP256K1_STATIC` macro for Windows users (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Previous attempts:
- https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/pull/1346
- https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/pull/1362
The result is as follows:
1. Simple, concise and extensively documented code.
2. Explicitly documented use cases with no ambiguities.
3. No workarounds for linker warnings.
4. Solves one item in https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/issues/1235.
ACKs for top commit:
real-or-random:
utACK c6cd2b15a0
Tree-SHA512: d58694452d630aefbd047916033249891bc726b7475433aaaa7c3ea2a07ded8f185a598385b67c2ee3440ec5904ff9d9452c97b0961d84dcb2eb2cf46caa171e
b6b9834e8d small fixes (Alejandro)
Pull request description:
Corrected some typos
ACKs for top commit:
real-or-random:
ACK b6b9834e8d
Tree-SHA512: c40c22c66f1067ecca351f08cca07a78b00bb98af2f6cfb08c25d0b1db6845e0e32ace1954c386db7020cf9fc7ae973ff15bd6d9c0144f3d21ea28c15741050f
By requiring that the input group element's X coordinate (`a->x`) has a
magnitude of <= 31, the normalize_weak call and also the field element
variable `r2` are not needed anymore and hence can be dropped.
It is a non-Libtool-specific way to explicitly specify the user's
intention to consume a static `libseck256k1`.
This change allows to get rid of MSVC linker warnings LNK4217 and
LNK4286. Also, it makes possible to merge the `SECP256K1_API` and
`SECP256K1_API_VAR` into one.
There are several instances in the tests where random non-zero field
elements are generated by calling `random_fe_test` in a do/while-loop.
This commit deduplicates all these by introducing a
`random_fe_non_zero_test` helper. Note that some instances checked the
is-zero condition via `secp256k1_fe_normalizes_to_zero_var`, which is
unnecessary, as the result of `random_fe_test` is already normalized (so
strictly speaking, this is not a pure refactor).
There is a function `random_fe_test` which does exactly the
same, so use that instead. Note that it's also moved up before the
`random_group_element_test` function, in order to avoid needing a forward
declaration.
be8ff3a02a field: Static-assert that int args affecting magnitude are constant (Tim Ruffing)
Pull request description:
See #1001.
Try to revert the lines in `tests.c` to see the error message in action.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
ACK be8ff3a02a. Verified by introducing some non-constant expressions and seeing compilation fail.
theStack:
ACK be8ff3a02a
Tree-SHA512: 8befec6ee64959cdc7f3e29b4b622410794cfaf69e9df8df17600390a93bc787dba5cf86239de6eb2e99c038b9aca5461e4b3c82f0e0c4cf066ad7c689941b19
7d8d5c86df tests: refactor: take use of `secp256k1_ge_x_on_curve_var` (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
The recently merged ellswift PR (#1129) introduced a helper `secp256k1_ge_x_on_curve_var` to check if a given X coordinate is on the curve (i.e. the expression x^3 + 7 is square, see commit 79e5b2a8b8). This can be used for code deduplication in the `ecmult_const_mult_xonly` test.
(Found this instance via `$ git grep add_int.*SECP256K1_B`, I think it's the only one where the helper can be used.)
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 7d8d5c86df
real-or-random:
utACK 7d8d5c86df
Tree-SHA512: aebff9b5ef2f6f6664ce89e4e1272cb55b6aac81cfb379652c4b7ab30dd1d7fd82a2c3b47c7b7429755ba28f011a3a9e2e6d3aa5c77d3b105d159104c24b89f3
The recently merged ellswift PR (#1129) introduced a helper
`secp256k1_ge_x_on_curve_var` to check if a given X coordinate is
valid (i.e. the expression x^3 + 7 is square, see commit
79e5b2a8b8). This can be used for code
deduplication in the `ecmult_const_mult_xonly` test.
5b7bf2e9d4 Use `__shiftright128` intrinsic in `secp256k1_u128_rshift` on MSVC (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Closes https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/issues/1324.
As the `__shiftright128` [docs](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/intrinsics/shiftright128) state:
> The `Shift` value is always modulo 64...
it is not applicable for the `n >= 64` branch.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 5b7bf2e9d4
real-or-random:
ACK 5b7bf2e9d4 tested with MSVC x64
Tree-SHA512: bc4c245a9da83c783a0479e751a4bc2ec77a34b99189fcc4431033a5420c93b610f3b960d3f23c15bce2eb010beba665b3e84d468b3fdab3d5846d4f27016898
e449af6872 Drop no longer needed `#include "../include/secp256k1.h"` (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
The removed header includes have not been needed since https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/pull/1231.
Test suggestions:
1. Using Autottols-based build system:
```
./autogen.sh
./configure
make clean-precomp
make
```
2. Using CMake-based build system:
```
cmake -B build -DCMAKE_C_INCLUDE_WHAT_YOU_USE="include-what-you-use"
cmake --build build --target secp256k1_precomputed
```
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK e449af6872
real-or-random:
utACK e449af6872
Tree-SHA512: 5aed7a88e1e03fcc2306c43817712c0652ecf6145679dd17f4719376818d372f619e4180bdaee548f2e82aaccbe6a2ff4c37203121d939af545128c8c48b933e
