Kgothatso Ngako acff66a22e feat: rebuild the group's signed record out of the rows it left behind
Phase 3 of docs/member-archive.md. `ArchiveManager.assemble` walks a room's rows,
rebuilds each into the event the group signed, drops anything it cannot prove,
and cuts the rest into pages. Nothing sends one yet.

**The gate found a real bug, which is why it was the gate.** Signed events are
not stored as events -- `FrostSigningManager.complete` applies one and what
survives is a `Mantra*` row -- so an archive has to rebuild them with `toXEvent()`
and stands or falls on that being byte-identical to what was signed. Every
`toXEvent()` in the codebase turned out to be unused in production, written for
exactly this and never called, so the "tag order matches build so the event id
round-trips" comments on them were claims nothing had ever checked.

One was wrong. `MantraArtifact.toArtifactEvent` put the alt tag last where
`ArtifactEvent.build` puts it first, and left out the version metadata tag
altogether -- because that tag is not on the artifact row at all.
`fromArtifactEvent` reads the artifact's own fields and drops the version label,
which `applyInnerEvent` has by then turned into the artifact's first
`MantraArtifactVersion`. So the label is now a parameter, read off the initial
version: the one whose `createdAt` is the artifact's, since `initialVersionOf`
derives it from the same event.

Neither fault would have surfaced as an error. Both produce a well-formed
artifact whose id no longer matches its fields, which every receiver drops as a
forgery, silently, one kind at a time. `ArchiveRoundTripTest` now signs each
archivable kind with a real quorum, files it as a row, rebuilds it and asserts
the signature still covers what comes out -- plus the negative case, that
rebuilding with the wrong version label fails as a forgery rather than as a
mistake, which is why the assembler reads the label rather than defaulting it.

**The allowlist narrows from nine kinds to six, and this is the finding to read.**
Only six of the thirteen nip30303 kinds ever reach a signing session; the rest
travel as member rumors, vouched for by the MLS frame they arrived in and by
nothing that survives leaving it. An artifact version is derived rather than
signed -- which is fine, because applying the archived artifact derives it again
and the chapters hanging off it keep their foreign key. Nothing builds a
`TranslationEvent` at all. The contributor lists have no arm in `applyInnerEvent`
that writes a row.

And `TranslationChunkEvent` -- **the translated text itself** -- is submitted by
`MantraDao.saveTranslation` as its author's rumor, because a translation is one
member's work rather than a group decision. So an archive restores everything a
translation hangs on and not the translation: a new member gets the dialects, the
artifacts, the chapters, the source chunks, which translations exist and their
chapter scaffolding, and none of the prose. That is a real limit rather than a
detail, so it is written into the allowlist's own doc comment, into the plan's
"what this does not do", and into a test named after it -- with the three ways
out sketched and none of them taken here, because the cheapest gives up the
property the rest of this rests on and the best is a product decision about
whether translating is an act of the group or of a member.

**Nothing unverifiable leaves.** Every rebuilt event is checked with
`isSignedByRoom` against the same room id the recipient will use. Not politeness
-- the receiver checks anyway -- but so the page count says what will actually
arrive: a row from a member's rumor is dropped here rather than by the recipient.

**Walked down the tree, not queried per kind.** Only dialects and artifacts have
a by-room query and the rest hang off a parent, and the walk is also what puts an
artifact's version label within reach. Order is settled afterwards by
`inApplyOrder` rather than by the walk, since the walk groups by artifact and the
foreign keys are by kind.

**Paging is greedy against both caps**, because they bind different archives: a
room of one-line dialects hits the count first and a room of chapters hits the
bytes. An event too large for a page of its own is dropped with a log rather than
failing the archive -- a chapter nobody can archive is a hole, a member who gets
nothing is a bigger one.

Assembling only; queueing moved to Phase 5, where the thing that decides when to
send lives. That keeps this testable against a real database with no outbound
path in the way.

Seven tests over a real in-memory database seeded through `applyInnerEvent`
itself, so what is archived is what a member's device really holds rather than
rows built to suit the test: every payload verifies, all six kinds appear exactly
as often as they were signed, the whole archive is in dependency order end to
end, a member's unsigned dialect sitting in the same room is left out, an empty
room archives nothing without failing, and two archives of identical rows do not
share an id -- which is what stops two members answering one request from having
their pages counted towards each other's total.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-06 14:12:29 +02:00
2026-07-05 23:21:02 +02:00
2026-07-28 09:10:20 +02:00
2026-03-24 04:47:19 +02:00
2026-03-23 01:41:39 +02:00
2026-03-23 01:41:39 +02:00
2026-03-23 01:41:39 +02:00

This is a Kotlin Multiplatform project targeting Android, iOS, Desktop (JVM).

  • /composeApp is for code that will be shared across your Compose Multiplatform applications. It contains several subfolders:

    • commonMain is for code thats common for all targets.
    • Other folders are for Kotlin code that will be compiled for only the platform indicated in the folder name. For example, if you want to use Apples CoreCrypto for the iOS part of your Kotlin app, the iosMain folder would be the right place for such calls. Similarly, if you want to edit the Desktop (JVM) specific part, the jvmMain folder is the appropriate location.
  • /iosApp contains iOS applications. Even if youre sharing your UI with Compose Multiplatform, you need this entry point for your iOS app. This is also where you should add SwiftUI code for your project.

Build and Run Android Application

To build and run the development version of the Android app, use the run configuration from the run widget in your IDEs toolbar or build it directly from the terminal:

  • on macOS/Linux
    ./gradlew :composeApp:assembleDebug
    
  • on Windows
    .\gradlew.bat :composeApp:assembleDebug
    

Build and Run Desktop (JVM) Application

To build and run the development version of the desktop app, use the run configuration from the run widget in your IDEs toolbar or run it directly from the terminal:

  • on macOS/Linux
    ./gradlew :composeApp:run
    
  • on Windows
    .\gradlew.bat :composeApp:run
    

Build and Run iOS Application

To build and run the development version of the iOS app, use the run configuration from the run widget in your IDEs toolbar or open the /iosApp directory in Xcode and run it from there.


Learn more about Kotlin Multiplatform

Description
Mantra as a kotlin multiplatform project
https://mantra.press
Readme 8.2 MiB
Languages
Kotlin 100%