Files
mantra-kmp/docs
Kgothatso Ngako 4681ac1a03 refactor: retire the brand before mantra, and keep the three records of it
Phase 0 of docs/curated-to-mantra.md, item 2. The app has been Mantra since
before this repository had a docs/ directory, and four things still said Torch,
the brand before it: the theme composable, `TorchTheme`, at 116 sites; the
user agent, `UserAgent.APP_NAME` and `CLIENT_NAME`; two error strings a user
could actually be shown ("tell X to use Torch", "finished setting up Torch");
and iOS, where `Config.xcconfig` built `PRODUCT_NAME=Torch` under the bundle id
`ac.aux.compose.Aux` and the project's product reference was still `Aux.app` --
two brands ago. All four now say Mantra.

**This is done natively, before anything is pulled from the fork, so that the
fork's theme maps onto a name that means something.** The Curated fork retired
Torch itself in d26cf6c7 (`TorchTheme` -> `CuratedTheme`, later `CurareTheme`).
The pull rewrites every fork commit into this repository's names, and until
now the only honest target for `CurareTheme` was `TorchTheme` -- the brand
before last -- which would have had every pulled screen wrapping itself in a
name the app stopped using long ago. `MantraTheme` is what the rewrite maps to
from here; docs/scripts/curated-unbrand.py's theme, `UserAgent` and iOS rules
are changed in this commit for that reason, and the comment that said "change
here if Phase 0 renames it" goes with them. Retiring Torch as part of the pull
instead -- by taking the rewritten d26cf6c7 -- was rejected because that commit
would then be a fork commit renaming something the fork never had, and because
the iOS half of the debt was never the fork's to pay.

**The user agent went last, and the reason it could go at all is written where
the next reader will look.** `CLIENT_NAME` is the `client` tag on every relay
list this app publishes, which is why it was left alone when the top bar was
fixed: it goes on the wire, so it read as a network identity question. It is
attribution and nothing derives from it, which is the difference between it
and the two `mantra/` hash tags that must never move; the comment on the
`HomeScreen` bar and the paragraph in material-design-conformance.md that both
said "still says Torch" now say that, in order, rather than describing a state
this commit ends.

**Three records keep the old name on purpose.** material-design-conformance.md:278
records a finding -- the top bar once read "Torch" while the window title read
"Mantra" -- and changing it would falsify the record. The paragraph at :654 is
rewritten rather than deleted because it was a statement of current state, and
the current state changed. `NavigationRoutingTest`'s "Introducing... Torch"
fixture is the string a stranded user actually saw, and the test is about the
stranding. Nothing else in the tree says Torch.

**iOS is unverified.** The build gates the apple targets behind `isMacOsX` and
this was built on linux; the xcconfig and pbxproj edits are the same shape the
fork's went through, and this is the first time this repository has named
itself there. Build it on a Mac before believing it.

:composeApp:compileDebugKotlinAndroid and :composeApp:compileKotlinJvm clean;
:composeApp:jvmTest 736 tests, 0 failures; :composeApp:testDebugUnitTest 403
tests, 0 failures; :composeApp:m3Audit all budgets met.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-13 11:42:36 +02:00
..

mantra docs

Notes on the parts of this app whose behaviour is not recoverable by reading the code alone — where the reasoning lives in a protocol, a failure mode that is silent, or a decision that looked arbitrary and was not.

document covers
shared-key-ceremony.md ChillDKG over NIP-17: the rounds, the approval gates, the chat transcript, participant ordering
shared-key-derivation.md deriving further keys from the group's threshold key with FROST tweaks — why not BIP32, why no chain code, and the one rule that must not be broken
subgroups.md a group making another group — the four ceremonies, what the parent's signature actually covers, and why the child's key is fresh rather than derived
frost-batch-signing.md signing several events in one ceremony — why one nonce can never cover two messages, and the phased schema, wire and UI work that follows from it
marmot-membership.md how members join an MLS group, and the epoch race that makes a missing member look like a successful invite
member-chronicle.md handing a member added after the work was done the group's signed record — why the events are not on the wire at all, and why the room's id is enough to verify them
marmot-direct-messages.md a one-to-one message inside a group as a stock NIP-59 gift wrap — what its MIP-03 carve-out costs, why the sender cannot read their own, and the one query that would broadcast it
mls-skipped-keys.md why a group event that arrives a moment late is dropped for good, which flows trigger it, the quartz fix, and the partial mitigation in this app
long-running-sync.md the chat subscriptions that stay open instead of pulling once per screen — why the request queue could not simply hold one, and how the group filter follows the room list
dead-code.md code in the sync and relay stack that nothing calls, why each piece is still there, and which of it is a bug rather than a leftover
jvm-target.md what desktop support cost, phased — why the native chain was already done, why an empty source set in our phoenix fork was the real blocker, and why DAO tests need none of it
material-design-conformance.md what the M3 foundations actually require, measured against all 43 screens — the colour pairing that renders the app's own proposals invisible, and eight phases that put the decisions back in the theme
curated-to-mantra.md pulling the Curated fork's thirty-nine commits back under Mantra's names — which lines of work to take, the three decisions, and a measured way to replay a twice-rebranded history without touching seven hundred files by hand

Start with the ceremony if you are new to this area; the Marmot notes all assume it. Read the skipped-keys note before debugging any "the other device never got it" report — it is silent, and it looks like every other kind of delivery failure. The sync note stands alone, and the dead-code inventory reads as a follow-up to it. The batch-signing note is a phased plan that has been built: read it after the derivation note, whose one rule is the same one it is built around. The member chronicle note is a phased plan that has not been built, and reads as the membership note's unanswered half: what a member who joins late can be given, and the one thing they cannot. The jvm-target note is unrelated to all of them: it is a build and packaging story. The subgroups note is a phased plan that has been built; it assumes both shared-key notes and reads as the ceremony's second half — what a group does once it has a key, and what it can say about a group that does not yet. The Material Design note is a phased plan that has not been built, and is the only one about what the app looks like rather than what it does; read the jvm-target note first if you want to know why its adaptive-layout phase exists. The curated-to-mantra note is a phased plan that has not been built, though its dry run has: it is about the repository rather than the app, and reads alone, except that its first decision leans on the derivation note's one rule.