69e1ec033120497b83dd95d92166fa05c54b8a06 Get rid of secp256k1_fe_const_b (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Replaces #1282.
Its only remaining use is in a test introduced in #1118, and it is easily replaced by the new `secp256k1_fe_add_int` from #1217.
ACKs for top commit:
real-or-random:
utACK 69e1ec033120497b83dd95d92166fa05c54b8a06
Tree-SHA512: 6ada192e0643fc5326198b60f019a5081444f9ba0a5b8ba6236f2a526829d8e5e479556600a604d9bc96c7ba86e3aab813f93c66679287d2135e95a2b75f5d3e
68b16a1662af2db801a87d6f1afedca93ec2501c bench: Make sys/time.h a system include (Tim Ruffing)
Pull request description:
just because it is minimally more correct
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 68b16a1662af2db801a87d6f1afedca93ec2501c, I've skimmed through the whole codebase and did not find any more similar cases.
Tree-SHA512: 0a929b36202100abf0d14e9328a2dc2b4c9db5532f95514315cb04dd0a970dbbb1dc02c6275be0ec109dc88f6090f6ce48a65003c852fd4dc750decf07e563c4
To use, invoke `cmake` with argument `--preset dev-mode`.
Solves one item in #1235.
One disadvantage over `./configure --enable-dev-mode` is that CMake
does not provide a way to "hide" presets from users. That is,
`cmake --list-presets` will list dev-mode, and it will also appear
in `cmake-gui`, even though it's not selectable there due to bug
https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/-/issues/23341. (So in our
case, that's probably rather a feature than a bug.)
We curently use version 3 presets which require CMake 3.21+.
Unfortunately, CMake versions before 3.19 may ignore the `--preset`
argument silently. So if the preset is not picked up, make sure you
have a recent enough CMake version.
More unfortunately, we can't even spell this warning out in
CMakePresets.json because CMake does not support officially support
comments in JSON, see
- https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/-/issues/21858
- https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/-/merge_requests/5853 .
We could use a hack hinted at in
https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/-/issues/21858#note_908543
but that's risky, because it could simply break for future versions,
and we probably want to use presets not only for dev mode.
8e142ca4102ade1b90dcb06d6c78405ef3220599 Move `SECP256K1_INLINE` macro definition out from `include/secp256k1.h` (Hennadii Stepanov)
77445898a5852ecd38ab95cfb329333a82673115 Remove `SECP256K1_INLINE` usage from examples (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
From [IRC](https://gnusha.org/secp256k1/2023-01-31.log):
> 06:29 \< hebasto\> What are reasons to define the `SECP256K1_INLINE` macro in user's `include/secp256k1.h` header, while it is used internally only?
> 06:32 \< hebasto\> I mean, any other (or a new dedicated) header in `src` looks more appropriate, no?
> 06:35 \< sipa\> I think it may just predate any "utility" internal headers.
> 06:42 \< sipa\> I think it makes sense to move it to util.h
Pros:
- it is a step in direction to better organized headers (in context of #924, #1039)
Cons:
- code duplication for `SECP256K1_GNUC_PREREQ` macro
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 8e142ca4102ade1b90dcb06d6c78405ef3220599
real-or-random:
utACK 8e142ca410
Tree-SHA512: 180e0ba7c2ef242b765f20698b67d06c492b7b70866c21db27c18d8b2e85c3e11f86c6cb99ffa88bbd23891ce3ee8a24bc528f2c91167ec2fddc167463f78eac
1ecb94ebe9800900c7dd3a4f9883c600e25eecf7 build: Make `SECP_VALGRIND_CHECK` preserve `CPPFLAGS` (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
It was overlooked in #862 and #1027.
ACKs for top commit:
real-or-random:
utACK 1ecb94ebe9800900c7dd3a4f9883c600e25eecf7
Tree-SHA512: 263fc600ce9743e4aad767150f706bf7d4325dabb9c363ed57f08fe38faea94d7d1999804947cffeacbe698bb6d959ee6de3f6e50400050a390ecc0db957e426
35ada3b954ccc6c54628fb3bcc0365d176297019 tests: lint wycheproof's python script (RandomLattice)
Pull request description:
This PR lints tests_wycheproof_generate.py according to bitcoin's python linting scripts. This is a follow-up to PR #1245.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 35ada3b954ccc6c54628fb3bcc0365d176297019
real-or-random:
utACK 35ada3b954ccc6c54628fb3bcc0365d176297019
Tree-SHA512: ea405060d2e73ff3543626687de5bc5282be923b914bd5c8c53e65df8dca9bea0000c416603095efff29bc7ae43c2081454c4e506db0f6805443d023fbffaf4c
ef49a11d29601e09e94134975c968e92c0214102 build: allow static or shared but not both (Cory Fields)
36b0adf1b90139a41fdcb94390d0bb06e9224795 build: remove warning until it's reproducible (Cory Fields)
Pull request description:
Continuing from here: https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/issues/1224#issuecomment-1460438227
Unfortunately it wasn't really possible to keep a clean diff here because of the nature of the change. I suggest reviewing the lib creation stuff in its entirety, sorry about that :\
Rather than allowing for shared and static libs to be built at the same time like autotools, this PR switches to the CMake convention of allowing only 1.
A new `BUILD_SHARED_LIBS` option is added to match CMake convention, as well as a `SECP256K1_DISABLE_SHARED` option which overrides it. That way even projects which have `BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=1` can opt-into a static libsecp in particular.
Details:
Two object libraries are created: `secp256k1_asm` and `secp256k1_precomputed_objs`. Some tests/benchmarks use the object libraries directly, some link against the real lib: `secp256k1`.
Because the objs don't know what they're going to be linked into, they need to be told how to deal with PIC.
The `DEFINE_SYMBOL` property sets the `DLL_EXPORT` define as necessary (when building a shared lib)
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK ef49a11d29601e09e94134975c968e92c0214102, only [suggested](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/pull/1230#pullrequestreview-1388191165) changes since my recent [review](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/pull/1230#pullrequestreview-1352125381).
real-or-random:
ACK ef49a11d29601e09e94134975c968e92c0214102
Tree-SHA512: 8870de305176fdb677caff0fdfc6f8c59c0e906489cb72bc9980e551002812685e59e20d731f2a82e33628bdfbb7261eafd6f228038cad3ec83bd74335959600
a575339c0282ba49a4f46c9c660a4cc3b6bfc703 Remove bits argument from secp256k1_wnaf_const (always 256) (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
There is little reason for having the number of bits in the scalar as a parameter, as I don't think there are any (current) use cases for non-256-bit scalars.
ACKs for top commit:
jonasnick:
ACK a575339c0282ba49a4f46c9c660a4cc3b6bfc703
real-or-random:
utACK a575339c0282ba49a4f46c9c660a4cc3b6bfc703
Tree-SHA512: 994b1f19b4c513f6d070ed259a5d6f221a0c2450271ec824c5eba1cd0ecace276de391c170285bfeae96aaf8f1e0f7fe6260966ded0336c75c522ab6c56d182c
13c438cdeed358a20b1f0324ee36a6cadfaf0016 sync-upstream: Use --autostash to handle uncommitted changes (Tim Ruffing)
Pull request description:
This makes it possible to use sync-upstream with uncommitted changes. (This is in particular helpful when working on the script itself.)
Without this commit, git pull will fail due to the uncommitted changes.
ACKs for top commit:
apoelstra:
utACK 13c438cdeed358a20b1f0324ee36a6cadfaf0016
Tree-SHA512: c3a2fce68382bf4e769c64bbdc5666a8f4d9cf6f387e7d8af408e9c3e07b4a875205b7cdae9f647b7127128c13ee58effc0045ac5faf5fba2851b38af40439e8
This PR lints tests_wycheproof_generate.py according to pylint.
This is a follow-up to PR #1245.
Co-authored-by: Sean Andersen <6730974+andozw@users.noreply.github.com>
06c67dea9f6d46d3e24e810900fbb03045eae641 autotools: Don't regenerate Wycheproof header automatically (Tim Ruffing)
Pull request description:
This is a hot fix for https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27445 .
---
Pregenerated files that we distribute should not have dependencies in Makefile.am. For rationale, see the comments about the precomputed table files.
See also https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27445#issuecomment-1502994264 .
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 06c67dea9f6d46d3e24e810900fbb03045eae641
RandomLattice:
ACK 06c67dea9f
Tree-SHA512: fa7f44eaa1c7e42ecba5829ac1b8ae8b5826d1a1551e01c3caf37af780bd5c102c8f54e88520723937f7016d93c67b62a334c7a28b96c4f422a38fcf8e6a1984
This makes it possible to use sync-upstream with uncommitted changes. (This
is in particular helpful when working on the script itself.)
Without this commit, git pull will fail due to the uncommitted changes.
