Commit Graph

2708 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Hennadii Stepanov
4fb7ccf5d4 ci: Enforce base-10 evaluation 2026-02-03 11:24:14 +00:00
merge-script
57315a6985 Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1813: Remove trailing spaces and introduce -Wtrailing-whitespace=any compiler flag
86cae58d2f build: Add `-Wleading-whitespace=spaces` compiler flag (Hennadii Stepanov)
fb229e7602 build: Add `-Wtrailing-whitespace=any` compiler flag (Hennadii Stepanov)
13e3bee504 refactor: Remove trailing whitespace (Hennadii Stepanov)

Pull request description:

  This PR removes trailing whitespace and introduces the `-Wtrailing-whitespace=any` compiler flag. This enforces the rule from [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-conventions) ("Avoid trailing whitespace") directly in the CI.

  This fix is required to unbreak Bitcoin Core CI builds [using GCC 15](https://github.com/hebasto/bitcoin-core-nightly/actions/runs/21436418669) after merging https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/34412.

ACKs for top commit:
  real-or-random:
    utACK 86cae58d2f

Tree-SHA512: 87911af96321eb3fc185f4d5c30ca3546bfd952c5722e1eeac9dd8c278a4bc08d99a85b79342ca705598a7a64b940427402d32e46f5c078061ad7fdf2482334c
2026-02-02 16:19:59 +01:00
Hennadii Stepanov
86cae58d2f build: Add -Wleading-whitespace=spaces compiler flag 2026-02-02 13:01:25 +00:00
Hennadii Stepanov
fb229e7602 build: Add -Wtrailing-whitespace=any compiler flag 2026-02-02 13:01:24 +00:00
Hennadii Stepanov
13e3bee504 refactor: Remove trailing whitespace 2026-02-02 13:01:18 +00:00
merge-script
453949ab2a Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1816: ci: Rotate Docker cache keys
2ccff6eb73 ci: Add weekly schedule (Hennadii Stepanov)
2f18567d24 ci: Rotate Docker cache keys every 4 weeks (Hennadii Stepanov)
0ffb1749a5 ci, docker: Fix LLVM repository signature failure (Hennadii Stepanov)

Pull request description:

  This is an alternative to https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/pull/1807 that avoids introducing a new workflow with the write permissions.

  Closes https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/issues/1691.

  The 4-week rotation interval was chosen based on the following [rationale](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/pull/1816#issuecomment-3833536293):
  > My thinking is that we may want to take only every fourth one. I assume this is still good enough to catch changes introduced by new compiler optimizations, and this is what we care about.
  >
  > We could just take the ISO week number mod 4. That results in an off-by-one error after every (rare) year with 53 ISO weeks, but ok, who cares... And if the cache is evicted for whatever other reason, we'll also get the most recent snapshot, but also that seems acceptable.

  ---

  **IMPORTANT NOTE:** Due to a mere coincidence, LLVM apt signatures became [rejected](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/153385) by Debian Trixie today. A commit containing a temporary workaround has been included to address this.

ACKs for top commit:
  real-or-random:
    ACK 2ccff6eb73

Tree-SHA512: c0362b107169d7cd7d36e0f7286d0bd183b734963beaa3915f198bedfd83f14222b779cb87eb6de2b1b940592954947d348a17a416e5db737a757397bd916447
2026-02-02 13:43:29 +01:00
merge-script
cd49c57e44 Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1814: release process: mention the [Unreleased] link clearly
0267b65512 release process: mention the `[Unreleased]` link clearly (Jonas Nick)

Pull request description:

  Adding this link was forgotten in the first version of the 0.7.1 release PR but caught in PR review.

ACKs for top commit:
  hebasto:
    ACK 0267b65512.
  sipa:
    ACK 0267b65512
  real-or-random:
    utACK 0267b65512

Tree-SHA512: a7eb30bbd3a0760402a61170a986c4de3f62c99f15780b336c474ddcb044d7916122fd1521c57cf31bb6c9fd466484542027bcbf699b3880564b8822d5af5520
2026-02-02 13:11:04 +01:00
Hennadii Stepanov
2ccff6eb73 ci: Add weekly schedule 2026-02-02 11:21:11 +00:00
Hennadii Stepanov
2f18567d24 ci: Rotate Docker cache keys every 4 weeks
This forces a periodic clean build to ensure we do not rely on stale
cache layers indefinitely.
2026-02-02 11:17:18 +00:00
Hennadii Stepanov
0ffb1749a5 ci, docker: Fix LLVM repository signature failure
The LLVM apt repository uses legacy SHA1 signatures which are now
rejected by the stricter Sequoia PGP policy.

This change extends the 'sha1.second_preimage_resistance' cutoff date to
9999-01-01 in the default Sequoia config. This effectively whitelists
the legacy signature algorithm, preventing "OpenPGP signature
verification failed" errors during `apt-get update`.

See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/153385.
2026-02-01 18:51:16 +00:00
Jonas Nick
0267b65512 release process: mention the [Unreleased] link clearly
Adding this link was forgotten in the first version of the 0.7.1 release PR but
caught in PR review.
2026-01-30 14:32:36 +00:00
merge-script
1605b02f75 Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1775: Add CMake build directory patterns to .gitignore
748c0fdd67 Add CMake build directory patterns to `.gitignore` (Hennadii Stepanov)
7eb86bdb01 autotools: Rename `build-aux` to `autotools-aux` (Hennadii Stepanov)

Pull request description:

  Whenever I work on changes that require comparison, such as benchmarking, I end up with two or more build directories that provide different binary variants simultaneously. Adding these build directories to `.gitignore` makes the workflow a bit easier.

  Additionally, a trivial refactoring is included to reduce the code.

ACKs for top commit:
  real-or-random:
    utACK 748c0fdd67
  furszy:
    ACK 748c0fdd67

Tree-SHA512: 948917dcdc2ec6d5a2227f35ef9208fdbc62c56047db1c60b39f6da632642847aefa18f136986f9f15f08e0b2385964afe9a311346b728536323c54b4f0e3f04
2026-01-28 08:27:56 +01:00
merge-script
14e56970cb Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1794: ecmult: Use size_t for array indices
47eb70959a ecmult: Use size_t for array indices in _odd_multiplies_table (Tim Ruffing)
bb1d199de5 ecmult: Use size_t for array indices into tables (Tim Ruffing)

Pull request description:

  I don't think the current code is incorrect, but using `size_t` improves readability because the type makes it clear that we're dealing with array indices.

  Also, making the result of the `ECMULT_TABLE_SIZE` macro (hopefully) a `size_t` fixes a compiler warning on MSVC, see #1791.

ACKs for top commit:
  hebasto:
    re-ACK 47eb70959a.
  jonasnick:
    ACK 47eb70959a
  theStack:
    ACK 47eb70959a

Tree-SHA512: e484fd610d50e972021c0184a683993364290eb58e09b65f9521b4507ec8d0639b402c67002005630b389bc863a7aa05b75f7224524dbcbafbfa5f9a4812b4a5
2026-01-27 09:50:16 +01:00
merge-script
c7a52400d6 Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1809: release cleanup: bump version after 0.7.1
ae7eb729c0 release cleanup: bump version after 0.7.1 (Jonas Nick)

Pull request description:

ACKs for top commit:
  real-or-random:
    ACK ae7eb729c0
  sipa:
    ACK ae7eb729c0

Tree-SHA512: 7319e1aa8fbdc53f95b9673fe6cf8fb2cbdf48b47c5576344ff3cc73fcf7f7f6594f26d020f418943f15008a0780bb582fa46f027991a41d0bd75eb004384ee0
2026-01-26 17:44:15 -05:00
Jonas Nick
ae7eb729c0 release cleanup: bump version after 0.7.1 2026-01-26 20:57:38 +00:00
merge-script
1a53f4961f Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1808: Prepare for 0.7.1
20a209f11c release: prepare for 0.7.1 (Jonas Nick)
c4b6a81a60 changelog: update in preparation for the v0.7.1 release (Jonas Nick)

Pull request description:

ACKs for top commit:
  sipa:
    ACK 20a209f11c
  real-or-random:
    ACK 20a209f11c

Tree-SHA512: 4d65218c9cc0cb0d968a972c2d199b2eaee12879a9a98dbea9476c10ae0d24f531dbb839989dfdcc01b3e3420c9a6e14a1fa9e2724c788bfafd33174675598e3
2026-01-26 14:41:38 -05:00
Jonas Nick
20a209f11c release: prepare for 0.7.1 2026-01-26 16:39:20 +00:00
Jonas Nick
c4b6a81a60 changelog: update in preparation for the v0.7.1 release 2026-01-26 16:26:39 +00:00
merge-script
ebb35882da Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1796: bench: fail early if user inputs invalid value for SECP256K1_BENCH_ITERS
c09215f7af bench: fail early if user inputs invalid value for SECP256K1_BENCH_ITERS (kevkevinpal)

Pull request description:

  ### Description
  Motivated by https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/pull/1793#issuecomment-3719488071

  In this change, the `get_iters` function was updated to print an error message and then return 0.

  In the functions that use `get_iters` they print the help text and then EXIT_FAILURE

  ### Before
  ```
  secp256k1 $ SECP256K1_BENCH_ITERS=abc ./build/bin/bench

  Benchmark                     ,    Min(us)    ,    Avg(us)    ,    Max(us)

  Floating point exception (core dumped)
  ```
  ### After
  ```
  secp256k1 $ SECP256K1_BENCH_ITERS=abc ./build/bin/bench

  Invalid value for SECP256K1_BENCH_ITERS must be a positive integer: abc

  Benchmarks the following algorithms:
      - ECDSA signing/verification
      - ECDH key exchange (optional module)
      - Schnorr signatures (optional module)
      - ElligatorSwift (optional module)

  The default number of iterations for each benchmark is 20000. This can be
  customized using the SECP256K1_BENCH_ITERS environment variable.

  Usage: ./bench [args]
  By default, all benchmarks will be run.
  args:
      help              : display this help and exit
      ecdsa             : all ECDSA algorithms--sign, verify, recovery (if enabled)
      ecdsa_sign        : ECDSA siging algorithm
      ecdsa_verify      : ECDSA verification algorithm
      ec                : all EC public key algorithms (keygen)
      ec_keygen         : EC public key generation
      ecdh              : ECDH key exchange algorithm
      schnorrsig        : all Schnorr signature algorithms (sign, verify)
      schnorrsig_sign   : Schnorr sigining algorithm
      schnorrsig_verify : Schnorr verification algorithm
      ellswift          : all ElligatorSwift benchmarks (encode, decode, keygen, ecdh)
      ellswift_encode   : ElligatorSwift encoding
      ellswift_decode   : ElligatorSwift decoding
      ellswift_keygen   : ElligatorSwift key generation
      ellswift_ecdh     : ECDH on ElligatorSwift keys
  ```

ACKs for top commit:
  hebasto:
    re-ACK c09215f7af.
  real-or-random:
    utACK c09215f7af

Tree-SHA512: 356df69e356db0b201339d40a6ffbcf29e4b7cc1e6aa82c00e1e7a2a7d11c47dd9c51baabcc63cabcff2ab42e2746a3cab659205f871a85122edda4a599d56c8
2026-01-23 15:38:38 +01:00
kevkevinpal
c09215f7af bench: fail early if user inputs invalid value for SECP256K1_BENCH_ITERS
In this change the get_iters function was updated to print an error
message and then return 0. In the functions that use get_iters they
print the help text and then EXIT_FAILURE
2026-01-23 08:07:22 -05:00
merge-script
471e3a130d Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1800: sage: verify Eisenstein integer connection for GLV constants
29ac4d8491 sage: verify Eisenstein integer connection for GLV constants (Justsomebuddy)

Pull request description:

  ## Summary

  Add assertions to `gen_split_lambda_constants.sage` to verify that the GLV decomposition constants arise from the Eisenstein integer factorization of the group order N.

  Specifically:
  - `N = a^2 + a*b + b^2` (norm equation in Z[ω])
  - `λ = b/a mod N` (eigenvalue from Z[ω]/(π) ≅ Z/NZ isomorphism)

  This addresses the suggestion in #1798 to document/verify the algebraic origin of these constants in the sage script rather than C comments.

  ## Details

  The group order N factors as N = π·π̄ in the Eisenstein integers Z[ω], where:
  - ω = (-1 + √-3)/2 is a primitive cube root of unity
  - π = a - b·ω is an Eisenstein prime with norm N(π) = a² + ab + b²

  The GLV constants (A1, B1) correspond to the Eisenstein factors (b, -a), and the endomorphism eigenvalue λ arises naturally as the image of ω under the quotient map Z[ω] → Z[ω]/(π) ≅ Z/NZ.

  Closes #1798

ACKs for top commit:
  real-or-random:
    utACK 29ac4d8491

Tree-SHA512: 6c36dacac00baf513db447a14f49c91d434c80ed79f9282d080938e3e53d39f0b68d07d62900da648d817eba3777505e9ef9306bc129f4521f524b4c64bcda49
2026-01-21 11:14:45 +01:00
Justsomebuddy
29ac4d8491 sage: verify Eisenstein integer connection for GLV constants
Add assertions to verify that the GLV decomposition constants arise
from the Eisenstein integer factorization of the group order N.

The group order factors as N = pi * conj(pi) in Z[w], where pi = A - B*w
is an Eisenstein prime. The GLV eigenvalue LAMBDA = B/A mod N, which is
the image of w^2 under the isomorphism Z[w]/(pi) -> Z/NZ.
2026-01-14 15:48:50 +00:00
Jonas Nick
4721e077b4 Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1793: doc/bench: added help text for SECP256K1_BENCH_ITERS env var for bench_ecmult
bd5ced1fe1 doc/bench: added help text for SECP256K1_BENCH_ITERS env var for bench_ecmult (kevkevinpal)

Pull request description:

ACKs for top commit:
  real-or-random:
    utACK bd5ced1fe1
  hebasto:
    ACK bd5ced1fe1, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK. Tested on Ubuntu 25.10.
  jonasnick:
    ACK bd5ced1fe1

Tree-SHA512: 7cfc1a8915717bdfe2901f20f578e23368ece9937a40f36805a0a5b741f97a0502a085c973f6912b96c2bca921ef1654908cfe2c90c0601a7ffa92de4415dc62
2026-01-11 20:45:00 +00:00
kevkevinpal
bd5ced1fe1 doc/bench: added help text for SECP256K1_BENCH_ITERS env var for bench_ecmult
In addition a print message saying some tests were skipped was added
2026-01-07 13:02:06 -05:00
Tim Ruffing
47eb70959a ecmult: Use size_t for array indices in _odd_multiplies_table 2026-01-07 11:58:12 +01:00
Tim Ruffing
bb1d199de5 ecmult: Use size_t for array indices into tables 2026-01-07 11:58:12 +01:00
merge-script
2d9137ce9d Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1764: group: Avoid using infinity field directly in other modules
2f73e5281d group: Avoid using infinity field directly in other modules (Tim Ruffing)

Pull request description:

  Minor refactoring to make the abstraction cleaner

ACKs for top commit:
  hebasto:
    ACK 2f73e5281d, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK.
  theStack:
    ACK 2f73e5281d

Tree-SHA512: eae5ad1ce81f491adb48ab1cbf04211f8d43e41255abcacc958fa3dcb1de5021707d56ed1b009a6f3f6c45cd8f20c1f2677891690a3c0a467fc7e064af2512a8
2026-01-06 10:12:53 +01:00
merge-script
f9a944ff2d Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1790: doc: include arg -DSECP256K1_USE_EXTERNAL_DEFAULT_CALLBACKS=ON for cmake
0406cfc4d1 doc: include arg -DUSE_EXTERNAL_DEFAULT_CALLBACKS=1 for cmake (kevkevinpal)

Pull request description:

  ### Motivation
  This is motivated by this comment https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/pull/1778#pullrequestreview-3578687144

  ### Rationale
  It makes sense to add documentation on how to configure for CMake. I can reword if other wording is preferred

ACKs for top commit:
  hebasto:
    ACK 0406cfc4d1.
  real-or-random:
    ACK 0406cfc4d1

Tree-SHA512: 06b8cc84fc2c080045eb1c16af6b236b5d7472696d2488821c64a07b55a12c32e77c65c001a7223e92edeb6150bf15b7a7367dd254307c7cb91debdb924574f0
2025-12-19 20:50:54 +01:00
kevkevinpal
0406cfc4d1 doc: include arg -DUSE_EXTERNAL_DEFAULT_CALLBACKS=1 for cmake 2025-12-19 09:51:39 -05:00
merge-script
8d445730ec Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1783: Add VERIFY_CHECKs and documentation that flags must be 0 or 1
ae00c552df Add VERIFY_CHECKs that flags are 0 or 1 (John Moffett)

Pull request description:

  Flags for constant-time masking rely on the values being exactly `0` or `1` rather than `0` or true (any nonzero). One function, `secp256k1_fe_cmov` [documents](e7f7083b53/src/field.h (L315)) and [`VERIFY_CHECK`s](e7f7083b53/src/field_impl.h (L365)) this, but most don't.

  This updates the documentation and adds `VERIFY_CHECK`s enforcing `flag == 0 || flag == 1` for:

  `secp256k1_fe_storage_cmov`
  `secp256k1_gej_cmov`
  `secp256k1_ge_storage_cmov`
  `secp256k1_scalar_cadd_bit`
  `secp256k1_scalar_cond_negate`
  `secp256k1_scalar_cmov`
  `secp256k1_int_cmov`

ACKs for top commit:
  furszy:
    ACK ae00c55
  hebasto:
    re-ACK ae00c552df.

Tree-SHA512: c9d358929d39d93b0aea602d318429f7e82af96bf601f048a1cdeb0621b8adc6d1204648d352aa2060cb0f63db6dcf0da863854375ed313cea44dfad61c19a18
2025-12-15 20:43:58 +01:00
merge-script
aa2a39c1a7 Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1778: doc/bench: Added cmake build options to bench error messages
3b5b03f301 doc/bench: Added cmake build options to bench error messages (kevkevinpal)

Pull request description:

  ## Motivation
  I wanted to try and run the benchmarking scripts and I noticed the recovery benchmark in `bench.c`. I wanted to run but I was using `cmake` and the error message telling me to use `./configure -enable-module-recovery` wasn't sufficient.

  I figure rather than forcing users to look into the `CMakeLists.txt` file or anywhere else we should add this to the output

  ## Solution
  I appended to the message to include the `-DSECP256K1_ENABLE_MODULE_...=ON` in the message.

ACKs for top commit:
  real-or-random:
    utACK 3b5b03f301
  hebasto:
    ACK 3b5b03f301, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK.

Tree-SHA512: 3a6c966b65ab3f0d6dda81e5dd95529087db3f2901f2686af68c16079ec5b323568f3c9acb155d92a6d50b4102faf0844d0d87216df001adbf69cab4ce86dabc
2025-12-15 20:42:15 +01:00
merge-script
540fec8ae9 Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1788: test: split monolithic ellswift test into independent cases
d822b29021 test: split monolithic ellswift test into independent cases (furszy)

Pull request description:

  No behavior changes.

  Refactors the previously monolithic ElligatorSwift test into isolated,
  independent test cases. Doing so allows the test suite to execute
  these cases in parallel rather than sequentially.

  Overall, I'm seeing 35-40% tests time reduction locally.

  This is quite useful for Debug builds with no optimizations,
  which are noticeably slow.

  ####  Local Debug-build Results (7 jobs):

  - master: 138.0 seconds.
  - this PR: 89.3 seconds.
     (~1.55× speedup, ~35% reduction)

  ####  Local Release-build Results (7 jobs):

  - master: 9.5 seconds.
  - this PR: 5.9 seconds.
     (~1.61× speedup, ~38% reduction)

  ####  rp5 Release-build results (5 jobs):
  - master: 39 seconds.
  - this PR: 24 seconds.
    (~1.62× speedup, ~38% reduction)

ACKs for top commit:
  hebasto:
    re-ACK d822b29021.
  theStack:
    ACK d822b29021

Tree-SHA512: b3d93f183c5eb5856a146c38719a8ca7ac42ac2a521b3cae3da6950881eb1745a047df9790db2b60dd56501c5ba40fc78e89d0c9b4db777f32520ed3c27ab9d1
2025-12-15 20:39:16 +01:00
furszy
d822b29021 test: split monolithic ellswift test into independent cases
No behavior changes.

Refactors the previously monolithic ElligatorSwift test into isolated,
independent test cases. Doing so allows the test suite to execute
these cases in parallel rather than sequentially.

Overall, seen 35-40% tests time reduction locally.

This is quite useful for the Debug build with no optimizations,
which is noticeably slow.

#### Local Debug-build Results (7 jobs):

- master: 138.0 seconds.
- this PR: 89.3 seconds.
   (~1.55× speedup, ~35% reduction)

#### Local Release-build Results (7 jobs):

- master: 9.5 seconds.
- this PR: 5.9 seconds.
   (~1.61× speedup, ~38% reduction)
2025-12-15 09:28:28 -05:00
John Moffett
ae00c552df Add VERIFY_CHECKs that flags are 0 or 1
Flags for constant-time masking rely
on the values being exactly 0 or 1 rather
than 0 or true. Add VERIFY_CHECKs to enforce
in VERIFY builds as a preventative
measure and add documentation where relevant.
2025-12-15 09:07:42 -05:00
merge-script
5c75183344 Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1784: refactor: remove ret from secp256k1_ec_pubkey_serialize
3daab83a60 refactor: remove ret from secp256k1_ec_pubkey_serialize (kevkevinpal)

Pull request description:

  This is a follow-up to https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/pull/1774#discussion_r2539737079

  It is pretty straightforward to remove `ret` and to just return either `0` or `1`

ACKs for top commit:
  real-or-random:
    utACK 3daab83a60
  theStack:
    ACK 3daab83a60

Tree-SHA512: ce598d917455a2d25297436bf2b900a9e88a638617cb79ca22e467135035c334b6815911fe4429ff44dbd877e6d10a346d0b37f2e5a7459e5b35854023832d27
2025-12-10 16:13:24 +01:00
merge-script
be5e4f02fd Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1779: Add ARG_CHECKs to ensure "array of pointers" elements are non-NULL
8bcda186d2 test: Add non-NULL checks for "pointer of array" API functions (Sebastian Falbesoner)
5a08c1bcdc Add ARG_CHECKs to ensure "array of pointers" elements are non-NULL (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  We currently have five public API functions that take an "array of pointers" as input parameter:
  * `secp256k1_ec_pubkey_combine` (`ins`: array of pointers to public keys to add)
  * `secp256k1_ec_pubkey_sort` (`pubkeys`: array of pointers to public keys to sort)
  * `secp256k1_musig_pubkey_agg` (`pubkeys`: array of pointers to public keys to aggregate)
  * `secp256k1_musig_nonce_agg` (`pubnonces`: array of pointers to public nonces to aggregate)
  * `secp256k1_musig_partial_sig_agg` (`partial_sigs`: array of pointers to partial signatures to aggregate)

  Out of these, only `_ec_pubkey_combine` verifies that the individual pointer elements in the array are non-NULL each:
  e7f7083b53/src/secp256k1.c (L774-L775)

  This PR adds corresponding `ARG_CHECKS` for the other API functions as well, in order to avoid running into potential UB due to NULL pointer dereference. It seems to me that the tiny run-time overhead is worth it doing this for consistency and to help users in case the arrays are set up incorrectly (I'm thinking e.g. of language binding writers where getting this right might be a bit more involved).

  Looking into this was motivated by a [review of furszy](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/pull/1765#discussion_r2590644412) (thanks!), who pointed out that the non-NULL checks are missing in at least one API function in the silentpayments module PR as well. Happy to add some `CHECK_ILLEGAL` tests if there is conceptual support for this PR.

ACKs for top commit:
  kevkevinpal:
    utACK [8bcda18](8bcda186d2)
  john-moffett:
    utACK 8bcda186d2
  real-or-random:
    utACK 8bcda186d2
  w0xlt:
    ACK 8bcda186d2

Tree-SHA512: 24acd6606526e3acb994e3361fde15771aa6706a6f3e7a6ae70b9a9ddb81ac1eedaac2025a027b890cecf98dab20dc378b94edde6c726888c44b9d35b7581ee1
2025-12-10 09:27:47 +01:00
kevkevinpal
3daab83a60 refactor: remove ret from secp256k1_ec_pubkey_serialize 2025-12-09 16:08:35 -05:00
Sebastian Falbesoner
8bcda186d2 test: Add non-NULL checks for "pointer of array" API functions 2025-12-09 01:38:48 +01:00
Sebastian Falbesoner
5a08c1bcdc Add ARG_CHECKs to ensure "array of pointers" elements are non-NULL 2025-12-06 01:13:58 +01:00
kevkevinpal
3b5b03f301 doc/bench: Added cmake build options to bench error messages 2025-12-05 09:25:23 -05:00
merge-script
e7f7083b53 Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1774: refactor: split up internal pubkey serialization function into compressed/uncompressed variants
f5e815f430 remove secp256k1_eckey_pubkey_serialize function (Sebastian Falbesoner)
0d3659c547 use new `_eckey_pubkey_serialize{33,65}` functions in modules (ellswift,musig) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
adb76f82ea use new `_eckey_pubkey_serialize{33,65}` functions in public API (Sebastian Falbesoner)
fc7458ca3e introduce `secp256k1_eckey_pubkey_serialize{33,65}` functions (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  This PR splits up the pubkey serialization function `secp256k1_eckey_pubkey_serialize` into two variants for the compressed (33 bytes) and uncompressed (65 bytes) public key output format each, where only non-infinity group elements as input are allowed. The motivation is to simplify call-sites significantly, as they currently need to introduce two variables and a VERIFY_CHECKs on the return value and the in/out size parameter within a pre-processor block, typically leading to 8 lines of code. By using the new functions, the code is reduced to a single line of code that just calls the function (see #1773). This is helpful for already existing modules on master (ellswift, musig) and upcoming ones (silentpayments, see #1765).

  One drawback is that the public API function `secp256k1_ec_pubkey_serialize` is now slightly more complex (we now call one of two functions instead of a single one, depending on whether the compressed flag is set or not), but that should hopefully not be a problem.

  The commits are intentionally kept small to ease review, happy to squash them if that is preferred.

  (Kudos to w0xlt for the initial idea (https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/pull/1765#pullrequestreview-3462461331) and to real-or-random for the suggestion to split the already existing function (https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/issues/1773#issuecomment-3540461718).)

ACKs for top commit:
  real-or-random:
    utACK f5e815f430
  w0xlt:
    ACK f5e815f430

Tree-SHA512: da576bbeae477f31ba76c0001f8df08b51fe5e31d67b422a238348ead3341bf37f0c1509ad9d0a93b63e6d61c152707c85beabd02f4eac3b3bdcff129e0ea750
2025-11-27 17:27:08 +01:00
Hennadii Stepanov
748c0fdd67 Add CMake build directory patterns to .gitignore 2025-11-20 12:42:08 +00:00
Hennadii Stepanov
7eb86bdb01 autotools: Rename build-aux to autotools-aux
This change improves separation from CMake build directories, which
typically use the "build" prefix.

Additionally, corresponding `.gitignore` entries have been refactored.
2025-11-20 12:40:50 +00:00
merge-script
b6c2a3cd77 Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1761: ecmult_multi: reduce strauss memory usage by 30%
26166c4f5f ecmult_multi: reduce strauss memory usage by 30% (Jonas Nick)

Pull request description:

  This is a draft because I'm not sure about the cleanest way to implement it.

ACKs for top commit:
  real-or-random:
    ACK 26166c4f5f benchmarks show no significant difference (only tried low point counts)
  siv2r:
    tACK 26166c4
  hebasto:
    ACK 26166c4f5f, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK.

Tree-SHA512: f289daee0b0b51451331eefdd99200a78bd83539365d38465c038dc0e6ad940daf821119f7161b08a2390cf046e3859a8f950f2fe881a427aba16353031def7d
2025-11-18 09:36:40 +01:00
Sebastian Falbesoner
f5e815f430 remove secp256k1_eckey_pubkey_serialize function 2025-11-17 18:35:32 +01:00
Sebastian Falbesoner
0d3659c547 use new _eckey_pubkey_serialize{33,65} functions in modules (ellswift,musig) 2025-11-17 18:13:56 +01:00
Sebastian Falbesoner
adb76f82ea use new _eckey_pubkey_serialize{33,65} functions in public API 2025-11-17 17:19:57 +01:00
Sebastian Falbesoner
fc7458ca3e introduce secp256k1_eckey_pubkey_serialize{33,65} functions 2025-11-17 17:12:20 +01:00
merge-script
c8206b1ce6 Merge bitcoin-core/secp256k1#1771: ci: Use Python virtual environment in "x86_64-macos-native" job
f252da7e6e ci: Use Python virtual environment in "x86_64-macos-native" job (Hennadii Stepanov)

Pull request description:

  Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/issues/1768.

  This PR explicitly sets up a virtual environment instead of using `uv`, as suggested [here](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/issues/1768#issue-3599176194), for the following reasons:
  1. It does not require granting a third-party action access to the repository.
  2. This approach is already used in other parts of the CI framework (it’s unclear why it was missed in https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/pull/1359 in the first place).

ACKs for top commit:
  real-or-random:
    ACK f252da7e6e

Tree-SHA512: df167db9b69ea4a055565c64ea0daa8c0d7b6a12510c35c22309f00a192a8cc4fbbdb0920bacd25547ea8c8f6a7853c2603be35234bd2bac88f610ea848f6120
2025-11-07 20:21:41 +01:00
Hennadii Stepanov
f252da7e6e ci: Use Python virtual environment in "x86_64-macos-native" job 2025-11-07 15:20:03 +00:00