edf2f0ce06 refactor wallet address caching into its own public method for offline wallet use (a5an0)
Pull request description:
### Description
Currently, the only way to ensure that a wallet's internal database has addresses loaded and cached is through `Wallet::sync`: that function generates and caches up to a number of addresses if they aren't already in the database, and then uses the wallet's blockchain client to sync those addresses. If you are using an offline wallet, there is no mechanism to ensure that the database has addresses loaded. This is a problem for usecases like an offline wallet being used as a multisig signer and wanting to validate change addresses as `Wallet::is_mine` will only work properly if the owned-address is loaded in the database.
This PR takes the address caching functionality out of `Wallet::sync` and puts it in a new public method that is available to offline wallets. `Wallet::sync` uses this method internally.
### Checklists
#### All Submissions:
* [X] I've signed all my commits
* [X] I followed the [contribution guidelines](https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
* [X] I ran `cargo fmt` and `cargo clippy` before committing
* [X] I've added docs for the new feature
* [X] I've updated `CHANGELOG.md`
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 8ddc58d71457163bb20ff663ac508feb4e77000688161b63841a94db30b3f29f60f35fa2467bd99546123148873e3aed11e2f13ae6cbceda6605b83c227d9079
022256c91a Fix comment on peek_address (Lloyd Fournier)
00f0901bac Add API for internal addresses (LLFourn)
Pull request description:
There are good reasons for applications to need to get internal
addresses too. For example creating a transactions that splits an output
into several smaller ones.
### Checklists
#### All Submissions:
* [x] I've signed all my commits
* [x] I followed the [contribution guidelines](https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
* [x] I ran `cargo fmt` and `cargo clippy` before committing
#### New Features:
* [x] I've added tests for the new feature
* [x] I've added docs for the new feature
* [x] I've updated `CHANGELOG.md`
ACKs for top commit:
notmandatory:
ACK 022256c91a
Tree-SHA512: 0ead6669c9974332708ae6cba1a5be69cd4b3b6c7a21896efdce178d4406265ba072e1cf02d1913178d0a551f3b276d99b75676c632833964f87484e262a61b1
For some reason while doing the "remove blockchain from wallet PR" I
changed the tests around in what I thought was a benign way. But it
meant (apparently) that both parties "test_sync_double_receive" were
using the same "blockchain". This meant that when the blockchain was RPC
they both imported their addresses to it and got each other's results
when syncing. This bugged out the sync and this commit fixes that.
Although somewhat convenient to have, coupling the Wallet with
the blockchain trait causes development friction and complexity.
What if sometimes the wallet is "offline" (no access to the blockchain)
but sometimes its online?
The only thing the Wallet needs the blockchain for is to sync.
But not all applications will even use the sync method and the sync
method doesn't require the full blockchain functionality.
So we instead pass the blockchain in when we want to sync.
- To further reduce the coupling with blockchain I removed the get_height call from `new` and just use the height of the
last sync in the database.
- I split up the blockchain trait a bit into subtraits.
There are good reasons for applications to need to get internal
addresses too. For example creating a transactions that splits an output
into several smaller ones.
1999d97aeb Remove `verify` flag from `TransactionDetails` via new MIGRATIONS (Steve Myers)
0195bc0636 Update CHANGELOG (rajarshimaitra)
1d7ea89d8a Refactor sync time verification (rajarshimaitra)
b05ee78c73 Remove verifcation flag from compact_filters (rajarshimaitra)
53c30b0479 Add verification tests in CI (rajarshimaitra)
6a09075d1a Remove verify flag from sqlite DB (rajarshimaitra)
61a95d0d15 Update changelog (rajarshimaitra)
08f312a82f Remove `verify` flag from `TransactionDetails` (rajarshimaitra)
acbf0ae08e Add sync verification for `esplora` (rajarshimaitra)
4761155707 Add sync verification in `electrum` (rajarshimaitra)
98a3b3282a Remove sync verification (rajarshimaitra)
Pull request description:
<!-- You can erase any parts of this template not applicable to your Pull Request. -->
### Description
As discussed in https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk/issues/498 and also in team call,
- default verification from wallet sync is removed
- `verify_tx` refactored as an wallet API
- in `sync` verification added for electrum and esplora backends, gated by `verify` flag.
- `verify` flag is removed from `TransactionDetails`.
### Notes to the reviewers
I haven't looked into `comapct_filters` to see how verification can fit there, but that will probably be required in future.
### Checklists
#### All Submissions:
* [x] I've signed all my commits
* [x] I followed the [contribution guidelines](https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
* [x] I ran `cargo fmt` and `cargo clippy` before committing
#### Wallet API change:
* [x] I've updated `CHANGELOG.md`
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 72e307008a137468d96d5c2a6ec804b18fa52363606f3c978208ae5dc22973a7f0aa37488e9bb98dde88409a12d59cc5f00c675d2d408e57e661bf6210bee67b
bfd0d13779 [blockchain] Fix `sent` calculation in the RPC backend (Daniela Brozzoni)
128c37595c [tests] Pass tx inputs to the testutils macro (Daniela Brozzoni)
Pull request description:
<!-- You can erase any parts of this template not applicable to your Pull Request. -->
### Description
<!-- Describe the purpose of this PR, what's being adding and/or fixed -->
### Notes to the reviewers
<!-- In this section you can include notes directed to the reviewers, like explaining why some parts
of the PR were done in a specific way -->
### Checklists
#### All Submissions:
* [x] I've signed all my commits
* [x] I followed the [contribution guidelines](https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
* [x] I ran `cargo fmt` and `cargo clippy` before committing
#### Bugfixes:
* [x] I've added tests to reproduce the issue which are now passing
ACKs for top commit:
afilini:
ACK bfd0d13779
Tree-SHA512: 1c214819c5dc1f1c30b1c6ef18a44a3013d587651890b26aecfc5203d128173fd91497337186bbee6934f77d3cfe1686e67b83ca6fe6e47b4c1d4b1dbcc656ee
We used to consider a tx input as ours if we had the
tx that creates it in the database.
This commit actually checks if an input is ours before adding
its value to the `sent` field.
b04bb590f3 Pin tokio version to ~1.14 (Steve Myers)
Pull request description:
### Description
The `tokio` project recently changed their MSRV to `1.49.0`. This PR will pin the `tokio` dependency version to `~1.14` which is prior to their MSRV increase.
### Notes to the reviewers
The LDK team took this approach for their `tokio` dev-dependency, see https://github.com/lightningdevkit/rust-lightning/pull/1315.
As long as `tokio` backports bug fixes to`1.14.x` releases this should be safe. If we need any new features we can revisit this decision.
### Checklists
#### All Submissions:
* [x] I've signed all my commits
* [x] I followed the [contribution guidelines](https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
* [x] I ran `cargo fmt` and `cargo clippy` before committing
#### New Features:
* [ ] I've updated `CHANGELOG.md`
ACKs for top commit:
LLFourn:
ACK b04bb590f3
Tree-SHA512: a44d61e0d644900837b5a99e0f2b9e5706cf9932f7430c3a2c8adbff37c82e4a6a545849fe031da748fcd8c8a70f5266d6974c5b6634b50af5eae148b9a26635
b6fe01c466 Implement XKeyUtils on InnerXKey (Gianluca Acerbis)
Pull request description:
Closes#395
<!-- You can erase any parts of this template not applicable to your Pull Request. -->
### Description
<!-- Describe the purpose of this PR, what's being adding and/or fixed -->
### Notes to the reviewers
<!-- In this section you can include notes directed to the reviewers, like explaining why some parts
of the PR were done in a specific way -->
### Checklists
#### All Submissions:
* [x] I've signed all my commits
* [x] I followed the [contribution guidelines](https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
* [x] I ran `cargo fmt` and `cargo clippy` before committing
#### New Features:
* [ ] I've added tests for the new feature
* [ ] I've added docs for the new feature
* [ ] I've updated `CHANGELOG.md`
#### Bugfixes:
* [ ] This pull request breaks the existing API
* [ ] I've added tests to reproduce the issue which are now passing
* [x] I'm linking the issue being fixed by this PR
ACKs for top commit:
danielabrozzoni:
ACK b6fe01c466 - the code looks good to me, I tested locally and all tests pass
notmandatory:
ACK b6fe01c466
Tree-SHA512: 00a3ed9532a0589ac4be55a7d0c6ac5251f03f716adb2086eb934d9a9b04bcb7fd95aaeba38b68c5c90876644ce53ac5e39a912a4096e789887342f8727ae434
The default sync verification is removed from wallet module.
By default sync time verification only makes sense for `electrum` and
`esplora` backend as they are usually untrusted 3rd party services.
script verification for transaction is costly, so removing default
script verification optimizes performance.
07c270db03 [ci] Pin nightly docs workflow rust version to nightly-2022-01-25 (Steve Myers)
Pull request description:
### Description
Pin nightly docs workflow rust version to `nightly-2022-01-25` to fix#538 .
### Notes to the reviewers
The nightly docs should be changed to the `stable` version once it supports `feature(doc_cfg)`.
### Checklists
#### All Submissions:
* [x] I've signed all my commits
* [x] I followed the [contribution guidelines](https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
#### Bugfixes:
* [x] I'm linking the issue being fixed by this PR
ACKs for top commit:
afilini:
ACK 07c270db03
Tree-SHA512: a8e5de051e1963c10d686d5cb5d1785e20f6cd322b9bfcf2d2f5c381d9124a9b8518671dfbedb11550bdfa66c8c64ad505c7e1604e2bfe23600de39cb20467dd
fcf422752b Fix 0.16.0 changelog, include WIF fix (Steve Myers)
6fb42fdea1 Bump version to 0.16.1-dev (Steve Myers)
3f65e8c64b Bump version to 0.16.0 (Steve Myers)
3f0101d317 Bump version to 0.16.0-rc.1 (Steve Myers)
Pull request description:
### Description
Merge the 0.16.0 release branch back into the master branch.
### Checklists
#### All Submissions:
* [x] I've signed all my commits
* [x] I followed the [contribution guidelines](https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
* [x] I ran `cargo fmt` and `cargo clippy` before committing
ACKs for top commit:
afilini:
ACK fcf422752b
Tree-SHA512: 7a1e9297f4e93284e5e57124c7afe37d1fbef1da48375b310aad7fe8556be6bba00c3263e9d15540209fc99ba5e928d3fc751d0df6592c2af871599f00941a7b
5ac51dfe74 fix and test is_dust (James Taylor)
a0c140bb29 add doc comment for IsDust trait (James Taylor)
bf5994b14a fixed fee in test, removed unnecessary comment (James Taylor)
ca682819b3 using dust value from rust-bitcoin (James Taylor)
Pull request description:
### Description
This PR aims to fix#472 . We can retrieve the dust value for a given ``bitcoin::blockdata::script::Script``, so I adjusted the ``is_dust`` function within the ``IsDust`` trait to receive such a ``&Script``. Thus, the ``is_dust`` function can make the proper comparison.
Let me know if you think that there could be a better interface than this.
Furthermore, because this new ``is_dust`` function provides a tighter upper bound on Bitcoin Core's ``GetDustThreshold()``, it actually invalidated a test. In the test, the drain output for a transaction was no longer considered dust and no longer included in the fee. Instead, the drain output was kicked back to the sender, invalidating the asserts in line 3436, 3437 and 3441 in ``src/wallet/mod.rs``. I increased the ``FeeRate`` in the test just enough that the drain output would be small enough to considered dust again and included in the total fee.
### Checklists
#### All Submissions:
* [x] I've signed all my commits
* [x] I followed the [contribution guidelines](https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
* [x] I ran `cargo fmt` and `cargo clippy` before committing
ACKs for top commit:
afilini:
ACK 5ac51dfe74
notmandatory:
re ACK 5ac51dfe74
Tree-SHA512: addf38fe065de581ddfcd3b4e6db92cd35d5bfa8cac78bd08c01f7a01292724a203ef59b09f3f5cd8e0fa0bb6d89efe72afda36efc11ded0424fc8105326af3f
380a4f2588 Disable reqwest's default features (Thomas Eizinger)
Pull request description:
### Description
By default, reqwest uses openssl for TLS. Any consumer wanting to use
rustls will thus pull in unnecessary dependencies.
### Checklists
#### All Submissions:
* [x] I've signed all my commits
* [x] I followed the [contribution guidelines](https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
* [x] I ran `cargo fmt` and `cargo clippy` before committing
#### New Features:
* ~[ ] I've added tests for the new feature~
* ~[ ] I've added docs for the new feature~
* [x] I've updated `CHANGELOG.md`
#### Bugfixes:
* ~[ ] This pull request breaks the existing API~
* ~[ ] I've added tests to reproduce the issue which are now passing~
* ~[ ] I'm linking the issue being fixed by this PR~
ACKs for top commit:
notmandatory:
ACK 380a4f2588
Tree-SHA512: 17827fdd7656a1e97b4cc302bc3c4907a8493505c798fafd9b15fde12531a32cf60e7d63e878eb2001d6b3e95f7ae3da730e227eb85c73d9de55b56456cfb3a0
