Currently we have a unit test to test that signers are sorted by
ordering. We call `add_external` to add them but currently we add them
in the same order we expect them to be in. This means if the
implementation happens to insert them simply in the order they are
added (i.e. insert to end of list) then this test will still pass.
Insert in a mixed order, including one lower followed by one higher -
this ensures we are not inserting at the front or at the back but are
actually sorting based on the `SignerOrdering`.
If we give the `DummySigner` a valid identifier then we can use this to
do comparison.
Half the time we do comparison we only have a `dyn Signer` so we cannot
use `PartialEq`, add a helper function to check equality (this is in
test code so its not toooo ugly).
Thanks @afilini for the suggestion.
Clippy emits error:
comparing trait object pointers compares a non-unique vtable address
The vtable is an implementation detail, it may change in future. we
should not be comparing vtable addresses for equality. Instead we can
get a pointer to the data field of a fat pointer and compare on that.
The syntax now is pretty much the same as the normal descriptor syntax,
with the only difference that modifiers cannot be grouped together (i.e.
`sdv:older(144)` must be turned into `s:d:v:older(144)`.
This commit upgrades `rust-miniscript` with a fix to only return the prefix that
matches a `hd_keypath` instead of the full derivation path, and then adapts the
signer code accordingly.
This commit closes#108 and #109.
