test(chain): Add test for conflicting transactions
Co-authored-by: Wei Chen <wzc110@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
48ca95b541
commit
6d601a7e88
629
crates/chain/tests/test_tx_graph_conflicts.rs
Normal file
629
crates/chain/tests/test_tx_graph_conflicts.rs
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,629 @@
|
||||
#[macro_use]
|
||||
mod common;
|
||||
|
||||
use std::collections::{BTreeSet, HashSet};
|
||||
|
||||
use bdk_chain::{keychain::Balance, BlockId};
|
||||
use bitcoin::{OutPoint, Script};
|
||||
use common::*;
|
||||
|
||||
#[allow(dead_code)]
|
||||
struct Scenario<'a> {
|
||||
/// Name of the test scenario
|
||||
name: &'a str,
|
||||
/// Transaction templates
|
||||
tx_templates: &'a [TxTemplate<'a, BlockId>],
|
||||
/// Names of txs that must exist in the output of `list_chain_txs`
|
||||
exp_chain_txs: HashSet<&'a str>,
|
||||
/// Outpoints that must exist in the output of `filter_chain_txouts`
|
||||
exp_chain_txouts: HashSet<(&'a str, u32)>,
|
||||
/// Outpoints of UTXOs that must exist in the output of `filter_chain_unspents`
|
||||
exp_unspents: HashSet<(&'a str, u32)>,
|
||||
/// Expected balances
|
||||
exp_balance: Balance,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// This test ensures that [`TxGraph`] will reliably filter out irrelevant transactions when
|
||||
/// presented with multiple conflicting transaction scenarios using the [`TxTemplate`] structure.
|
||||
/// This test also checks that [`TxGraph::list_chain_txs`], [`TxGraph::filter_chain_txouts`],
|
||||
/// [`TxGraph::filter_chain_unspents`], and [`TxGraph::balance`] return correct data.
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn test_tx_conflict_handling() {
|
||||
// Create Local chains
|
||||
let local_chain = local_chain!(
|
||||
(0, h!("A")),
|
||||
(1, h!("B")),
|
||||
(2, h!("C")),
|
||||
(3, h!("D")),
|
||||
(4, h!("E")),
|
||||
(5, h!("F")),
|
||||
(6, h!("G"))
|
||||
);
|
||||
let chain_tip = local_chain
|
||||
.tip()
|
||||
.map(|cp| cp.block_id())
|
||||
.unwrap_or_default();
|
||||
|
||||
let scenarios = [
|
||||
Scenario {
|
||||
name: "2 unconfirmed txs with same last_seens conflict",
|
||||
tx_templates: &[
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "tx1",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::Bogus],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(40000, Some(0))],
|
||||
anchors: &[block_id!(1, "B")],
|
||||
last_seen: None,
|
||||
},
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "tx_conflict_1",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::PrevTx("tx1", 0)],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(20000, Some(2))],
|
||||
last_seen: Some(300),
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "tx_conflict_2",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::PrevTx("tx1", 0)],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(30000, Some(3))],
|
||||
last_seen: Some(300),
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
// correct output if filtered by fee rate: tx1, tx_conflict_1
|
||||
exp_chain_txs: HashSet::from(["tx1", "tx_conflict_1", "tx_conflict_2"]),
|
||||
exp_chain_txouts: HashSet::from([("tx1", 0), ("tx_conflict_1", 0), ("tx_conflict_2", 0)]),
|
||||
// correct output if filtered by fee rate: tx_conflict_1
|
||||
exp_unspents: HashSet::from([("tx_conflict_1", 0), ("tx_conflict_2", 0)]),
|
||||
exp_balance: Balance {
|
||||
immature: 0,
|
||||
trusted_pending: 50000, // correct output if filtered by fee rate: 20000
|
||||
untrusted_pending: 0,
|
||||
confirmed: 0,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
Scenario {
|
||||
name: "2 unconfirmed txs with different last_seens conflict",
|
||||
tx_templates: &[
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "tx1",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::Bogus],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(10000, Some(0)), TxOutTemplate::new(10000, Some(1))],
|
||||
anchors: &[block_id!(1, "B")],
|
||||
last_seen: None,
|
||||
},
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "tx_conflict_1",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::PrevTx("tx1", 0), TxInTemplate::Bogus],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(20000, Some(2))],
|
||||
last_seen: Some(200),
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "tx_conflict_2",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::PrevTx("tx1", 0), TxInTemplate::PrevTx("tx1", 1)],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(30000, Some(3))],
|
||||
last_seen: Some(300),
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
exp_chain_txs: HashSet::from(["tx1", "tx_conflict_2"]),
|
||||
exp_chain_txouts: HashSet::from([("tx1", 0), ("tx1", 1), ("tx_conflict_2", 0)]),
|
||||
exp_unspents: HashSet::from([("tx_conflict_2", 0)]),
|
||||
exp_balance: Balance {
|
||||
immature: 0,
|
||||
trusted_pending: 30000,
|
||||
untrusted_pending: 0,
|
||||
confirmed: 0,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
Scenario {
|
||||
name: "3 unconfirmed txs with different last_seens conflict",
|
||||
tx_templates: &[
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "tx1",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::Bogus],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(10000, Some(0))],
|
||||
anchors: &[block_id!(1, "B")],
|
||||
last_seen: None,
|
||||
},
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "tx_conflict_1",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::PrevTx("tx1", 0), TxInTemplate::Bogus],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(20000, Some(1))],
|
||||
last_seen: Some(200),
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "tx_conflict_2",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::PrevTx("tx1", 0)],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(30000, Some(2))],
|
||||
last_seen: Some(300),
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "tx_conflict_3",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::PrevTx("tx1", 0)],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(40000, Some(3))],
|
||||
last_seen: Some(400),
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
exp_chain_txs: HashSet::from(["tx1", "tx_conflict_3"]),
|
||||
exp_chain_txouts: HashSet::from([("tx1", 0), ("tx_conflict_3", 0)]),
|
||||
exp_unspents: HashSet::from([("tx_conflict_3", 0)]),
|
||||
exp_balance: Balance {
|
||||
immature: 0,
|
||||
trusted_pending: 40000,
|
||||
untrusted_pending: 0,
|
||||
confirmed: 0,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
Scenario {
|
||||
name: "unconfirmed tx conflicts with tx in orphaned block, orphaned higher last_seen",
|
||||
tx_templates: &[
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "tx1",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::Bogus],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(10000, Some(0))],
|
||||
anchors: &[block_id!(1, "B")],
|
||||
last_seen: None,
|
||||
},
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "tx_conflict_1",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::PrevTx("tx1", 0), TxInTemplate::Bogus],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(20000, Some(1))],
|
||||
last_seen: Some(200),
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "tx_orphaned_conflict",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::PrevTx("tx1", 0)],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(30000, Some(2))],
|
||||
anchors: &[block_id!(4, "Orphaned Block")],
|
||||
last_seen: Some(300),
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
exp_chain_txs: HashSet::from(["tx1", "tx_orphaned_conflict"]),
|
||||
exp_chain_txouts: HashSet::from([("tx1", 0), ("tx_orphaned_conflict", 0)]),
|
||||
exp_unspents: HashSet::from([("tx_orphaned_conflict", 0)]),
|
||||
exp_balance: Balance {
|
||||
immature: 0,
|
||||
trusted_pending: 30000,
|
||||
untrusted_pending: 0,
|
||||
confirmed: 0,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
Scenario {
|
||||
name: "unconfirmed tx conflicts with tx in orphaned block, orphaned lower last_seen",
|
||||
tx_templates: &[
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "tx1",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::Bogus],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(10000, Some(0))],
|
||||
anchors: &[block_id!(1, "B")],
|
||||
last_seen: None,
|
||||
},
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "tx_conflict_1",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::PrevTx("tx1", 0), TxInTemplate::Bogus],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(20000, Some(1))],
|
||||
last_seen: Some(200),
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "tx_orphaned_conflict",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::PrevTx("tx1", 0)],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(30000, Some(2))],
|
||||
anchors: &[block_id!(4, "Orphaned Block")],
|
||||
last_seen: Some(100),
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
exp_chain_txs: HashSet::from(["tx1", "tx_conflict_1"]),
|
||||
exp_chain_txouts: HashSet::from([("tx1", 0), ("tx_conflict_1", 0)]),
|
||||
exp_unspents: HashSet::from([("tx_conflict_1", 0)]),
|
||||
exp_balance: Balance {
|
||||
immature: 0,
|
||||
trusted_pending: 20000,
|
||||
untrusted_pending: 0,
|
||||
confirmed: 0,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
Scenario {
|
||||
name: "multiple unconfirmed txs conflict with a confirmed tx",
|
||||
tx_templates: &[
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "tx1",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::Bogus],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(10000, Some(0))],
|
||||
anchors: &[block_id!(1, "B")],
|
||||
last_seen: None,
|
||||
},
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "tx_conflict_1",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::PrevTx("tx1", 0), TxInTemplate::Bogus],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(20000, Some(1))],
|
||||
last_seen: Some(200),
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "tx_conflict_2",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::PrevTx("tx1", 0)],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(30000, Some(2))],
|
||||
last_seen: Some(300),
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "tx_conflict_3",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::PrevTx("tx1", 0)],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(40000, Some(3))],
|
||||
last_seen: Some(400),
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "tx_confirmed_conflict",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::PrevTx("tx1", 0)],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(50000, Some(4))],
|
||||
anchors: &[block_id!(1, "B")],
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
exp_chain_txs: HashSet::from(["tx1", "tx_confirmed_conflict"]),
|
||||
exp_chain_txouts: HashSet::from([("tx1", 0), ("tx_confirmed_conflict", 0)]),
|
||||
exp_unspents: HashSet::from([("tx_confirmed_conflict", 0)]),
|
||||
exp_balance: Balance {
|
||||
immature: 0,
|
||||
trusted_pending: 0,
|
||||
untrusted_pending: 0,
|
||||
confirmed: 50000,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
Scenario {
|
||||
name: "B and B' spend A and conflict, C spends B, all the transactions are unconfirmed, B' has higher last_seen than B",
|
||||
tx_templates: &[
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "A",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::Bogus],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(10000, Some(0))],
|
||||
last_seen: Some(22),
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "B",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::PrevTx("A", 0)],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(20000, Some(1))],
|
||||
last_seen: Some(23),
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "B'",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::PrevTx("A", 0)],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(20000, Some(2))],
|
||||
last_seen: Some(24),
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "C",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::PrevTx("B", 0)],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(30000, Some(3))],
|
||||
last_seen: Some(25),
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
// A, B, C will appear in the list methods
|
||||
// This is because B' has a higher last seen than B, but C has a higher
|
||||
// last seen than B', so B and C are considered canonical
|
||||
exp_chain_txs: HashSet::from(["A", "B", "C"]),
|
||||
exp_chain_txouts: HashSet::from([("A", 0), ("B", 0), ("C", 0)]),
|
||||
exp_unspents: HashSet::from([("C", 0)]),
|
||||
exp_balance: Balance {
|
||||
immature: 0,
|
||||
trusted_pending: 30000,
|
||||
untrusted_pending: 0,
|
||||
confirmed: 0,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
Scenario {
|
||||
name: "B and B' spend A and conflict, C spends B, A and B' are in best chain",
|
||||
tx_templates: &[
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "A",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::Bogus],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(10000, Some(0))],
|
||||
anchors: &[block_id!(1, "B")],
|
||||
last_seen: None,
|
||||
},
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "B",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::PrevTx("A", 0)],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(20000, Some(1))],
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "B'",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::PrevTx("A", 0)],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(20000, Some(2))],
|
||||
anchors: &[block_id!(4, "E")],
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "C",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::PrevTx("B", 0)],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(30000, Some(3))],
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
// B and C should not appear in the list methods
|
||||
exp_chain_txs: HashSet::from(["A", "B'"]),
|
||||
exp_chain_txouts: HashSet::from([("A", 0), ("B'", 0)]),
|
||||
exp_unspents: HashSet::from([("B'", 0)]),
|
||||
exp_balance: Balance {
|
||||
immature: 0,
|
||||
trusted_pending: 0,
|
||||
untrusted_pending: 0,
|
||||
confirmed: 20000,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
Scenario {
|
||||
name: "B and B' spend A and conflict, C spends B', A and B' are in best chain",
|
||||
tx_templates: &[
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "A",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::Bogus],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(10000, Some(0))],
|
||||
anchors: &[block_id!(1, "B")],
|
||||
last_seen: None,
|
||||
},
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "B",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::PrevTx("A", 0)],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(20000, Some(1))],
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "B'",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::PrevTx("A", 0)],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(20000, Some(2))],
|
||||
anchors: &[block_id!(4, "E")],
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "C",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::PrevTx("B'", 0)],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(30000, Some(3))],
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
// B should not appear in the list methods
|
||||
exp_chain_txs: HashSet::from(["A", "B'", "C"]),
|
||||
exp_chain_txouts: HashSet::from([
|
||||
("A", 0),
|
||||
("B'", 0),
|
||||
("C", 0),
|
||||
]),
|
||||
exp_unspents: HashSet::from([("C", 0)]),
|
||||
exp_balance: Balance {
|
||||
immature: 0,
|
||||
trusted_pending: 30000,
|
||||
untrusted_pending: 0,
|
||||
confirmed: 0,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
Scenario {
|
||||
name: "B and B' spend A and conflict, C spends both B and B', A is in best chain",
|
||||
tx_templates: &[
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "A",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::Bogus],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(10000, Some(0))],
|
||||
anchors: &[block_id!(1, "B")],
|
||||
last_seen: None,
|
||||
},
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "B",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::PrevTx("A", 0), TxInTemplate::Bogus],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(20000, Some(1))],
|
||||
last_seen: Some(200),
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "B'",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::PrevTx("A", 0)],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(30000, Some(2))],
|
||||
last_seen: Some(300),
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "C",
|
||||
inputs: &[
|
||||
TxInTemplate::PrevTx("B", 0),
|
||||
TxInTemplate::PrevTx("B'", 0),
|
||||
],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(20000, Some(3))],
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
// C should not appear in the list methods
|
||||
exp_chain_txs: HashSet::from(["A", "B'"]),
|
||||
exp_chain_txouts: HashSet::from([("A", 0), ("B'", 0)]),
|
||||
exp_unspents: HashSet::from([("B'", 0)]),
|
||||
exp_balance: Balance {
|
||||
immature: 0,
|
||||
trusted_pending: 30000,
|
||||
untrusted_pending: 0,
|
||||
confirmed: 0,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
Scenario {
|
||||
name: "B and B' spend A and conflict, B' is confirmed, C spends both B and B', A is in best chain",
|
||||
tx_templates: &[
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "A",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::Bogus],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(10000, Some(0))],
|
||||
anchors: &[block_id!(1, "B")],
|
||||
last_seen: None,
|
||||
},
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "B",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::PrevTx("A", 0), TxInTemplate::Bogus],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(20000, Some(1))],
|
||||
last_seen: Some(200),
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "B'",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::PrevTx("A", 0)],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(50000, Some(4))],
|
||||
anchors: &[block_id!(1, "B")],
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "C",
|
||||
inputs: &[
|
||||
TxInTemplate::PrevTx("B", 0),
|
||||
TxInTemplate::PrevTx("B'", 0),
|
||||
],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(20000, Some(5))],
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
// C should not appear in the list methods
|
||||
exp_chain_txs: HashSet::from(["A", "B'"]),
|
||||
exp_chain_txouts: HashSet::from([("A", 0), ("B'", 0)]),
|
||||
exp_unspents: HashSet::from([("B'", 0)]),
|
||||
exp_balance: Balance {
|
||||
immature: 0,
|
||||
trusted_pending: 0,
|
||||
untrusted_pending: 0,
|
||||
confirmed: 50000,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
Scenario {
|
||||
name: "B and B' spend A and conflict, B' is confirmed, C spends both B and B', D spends C, A is in best chain",
|
||||
tx_templates: &[
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "A",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::Bogus],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(10000, Some(0))],
|
||||
anchors: &[block_id!(1, "B")],
|
||||
last_seen: None,
|
||||
},
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "B",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::PrevTx("A", 0), TxInTemplate::Bogus],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(20000, Some(1))],
|
||||
last_seen: Some(200),
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "B'",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::PrevTx("A", 0)],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(50000, Some(4))],
|
||||
anchors: &[block_id!(1, "B")],
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "C",
|
||||
inputs: &[
|
||||
TxInTemplate::PrevTx("B", 0),
|
||||
TxInTemplate::PrevTx("B'", 0),
|
||||
],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(20000, Some(5))],
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
TxTemplate {
|
||||
tx_name: "D",
|
||||
inputs: &[TxInTemplate::PrevTx("C", 0)],
|
||||
outputs: &[TxOutTemplate::new(20000, Some(6))],
|
||||
..Default::default()
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
// D should not appear in the list methods
|
||||
exp_chain_txs: HashSet::from(["A", "B'"]),
|
||||
exp_chain_txouts: HashSet::from([("A", 0), ("B'", 0)]),
|
||||
exp_unspents: HashSet::from([("B'", 0)]),
|
||||
exp_balance: Balance {
|
||||
immature: 0,
|
||||
trusted_pending: 0,
|
||||
untrusted_pending: 0,
|
||||
confirmed: 50000,
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
];
|
||||
|
||||
for scenario in scenarios {
|
||||
let (tx_graph, spk_index, exp_tx_ids) = init_graph(scenario.tx_templates.iter());
|
||||
|
||||
let txs = tx_graph
|
||||
.list_chain_txs(&local_chain, chain_tip)
|
||||
.map(|tx| tx.tx_node.txid)
|
||||
.collect::<BTreeSet<_>>();
|
||||
let exp_txs = scenario
|
||||
.exp_chain_txs
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.map(|txid| *exp_tx_ids.get(txid).expect("txid must exist"))
|
||||
.collect::<BTreeSet<_>>();
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
txs, exp_txs,
|
||||
"\n[{}] 'list_chain_txs' failed",
|
||||
scenario.name
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
let txouts = tx_graph
|
||||
.filter_chain_txouts(
|
||||
&local_chain,
|
||||
chain_tip,
|
||||
spk_index.outpoints().iter().cloned(),
|
||||
)
|
||||
.map(|(_, full_txout)| full_txout.outpoint)
|
||||
.collect::<BTreeSet<_>>();
|
||||
let exp_txouts = scenario
|
||||
.exp_chain_txouts
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.map(|(txid, vout)| OutPoint {
|
||||
txid: *exp_tx_ids.get(txid).expect("txid must exist"),
|
||||
vout: *vout,
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect::<BTreeSet<_>>();
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
txouts, exp_txouts,
|
||||
"\n[{}] 'filter_chain_txouts' failed",
|
||||
scenario.name
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
let utxos = tx_graph
|
||||
.filter_chain_unspents(
|
||||
&local_chain,
|
||||
chain_tip,
|
||||
spk_index.outpoints().iter().cloned(),
|
||||
)
|
||||
.map(|(_, full_txout)| full_txout.outpoint)
|
||||
.collect::<BTreeSet<_>>();
|
||||
let exp_utxos = scenario
|
||||
.exp_unspents
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.map(|(txid, vout)| OutPoint {
|
||||
txid: *exp_tx_ids.get(txid).expect("txid must exist"),
|
||||
vout: *vout,
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect::<BTreeSet<_>>();
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
utxos, exp_utxos,
|
||||
"\n[{}] 'filter_chain_unspents' failed",
|
||||
scenario.name
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
let balance = tx_graph.balance(
|
||||
&local_chain,
|
||||
chain_tip,
|
||||
spk_index.outpoints().iter().cloned(),
|
||||
|_, spk: &Script| spk_index.index_of_spk(spk).is_some(),
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
balance, scenario.exp_balance,
|
||||
"\n[{}] 'balance' failed",
|
||||
scenario.name
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user