Eric Lombrozo
f026c28da5
MULICHECKSIG -> CHECKMULTISIG
...
n-of-m -> m-of-n
LN motivation
smaller SPV proof motivation
2015-12-22 20:56:09 -05:00
jl2012
1cdf145b9b
Update bip-segwit.mediawiki
2015-12-22 20:56:09 -05:00
Eric Lombrozo
1817685aa9
Added fraud proof motivation.
2015-12-22 20:56:09 -05:00
jl2012
7bce321a18
Create bip-segwit.mediawiki
2015-12-22 20:56:09 -05:00
MarcoPon
29b8eaef02
Some clarifications, typos
2015-12-21 15:39:29 +01:00
Dionysis Zindros
e84e2d5c38
Fix broken GitHub https URL
2015-12-21 15:39:26 +01:00
MarcoPon
01201d6ce5
Created bip-MarcoPon-01.mediawiki
...
URI scheme for Blockchain references / exploration
2015-12-21 15:38:57 +01:00
Justus Ranvier
2f566884f4
update recent changes
2015-12-18 13:48:13 -06:00
Justus Ranvier
27848f7d6b
Clarify the definition of identity and the relationship to BIP-44
2015-12-18 13:40:54 -06:00
Justus Ranvier
650fa601ad
enumerate the list of script forms which can convey a notification pubkey
2015-12-18 10:47:49 -06:00
Justus Ranvier
a6f4ae5b5d
clarify wallet recovery procedure
2015-12-18 10:47:49 -06:00
Justus Ranvier
07ab320513
clarify the various types of child keys derived from an identity
2015-12-18 10:47:44 -06:00
Justus Ranvier
876af7fa87
add missing change notification and minor corrections
2015-12-18 10:45:02 -06:00
Jeff Garzik
5cdae758f3
BIP 102: 95% update req
2015-12-18 08:39:00 -05:00
Jeff Garzik
32112987af
BIP 102: remove dynamic adjustment
2015-12-18 08:01:30 -05:00
Jeff Garzik
097983d256
BIP 102: update to match implementation
2015-12-17 23:21:13 -05:00
David A. Harding
b57eea446c
Add opt-in full-RBF signaling BIP
2015-12-11 11:45:59 -05:00
Luke-Jr
6bfc0151a7
Merge pull request #260 from btcdrak/bip68mtp
...
BIP68: update specification to assume MTP
2015-12-11 07:08:23 +00:00
Luke-Jr
99effc1c70
Merge pull request #254 from jl2012/patch-6
...
Full description of the behavior of OP_CLTV
2015-12-11 07:04:11 +00:00
BtcDrak
df9d34d537
Update deployment specification
...
BIP68 must be deployed with BIP113 because MTP calculations are
used by this BIP.
2015-12-10 21:38:43 +00:00
BtcDrak
7239c330c7
BIP68 now assume MTP in all instances
2015-12-10 20:01:35 +00:00
Kristov Atlas
385e3d7343
fix typo in block height of P2SH validation
2015-12-09 15:32:00 -05:00
jl2012
abc7ae83a0
Update bip-0065.mediawiki
...
the nLockTime feature may still be active as other inputs may not be final
2015-12-09 00:37:25 +08:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
84779aa5c3
Merge pull request #258 from petertodd/bip65-fix-spec-missing-case
...
BIP65 formatting fixes
2015-12-08 10:35:00 +01:00
Chris Priest
e994fa264a
fixed bolding
2015-12-07 15:55:42 -08:00
Luke-Jr
44f021979a
Merge pull request #252 from jl2012/patch-5
...
Corrections with the conditions for script failure
2015-12-07 20:34:40 +00:00
Matt David
583a64cf3d
Merge pull request #1 from voisine/patch-3
...
use same email for voisine as in other BIPs
2015-12-07 11:45:09 -08:00
Aaron Voisine
d14e205477
use same email for voisine as in other BIPs
2015-12-07 09:42:25 -08:00
jl2012
004be2e822
Update bip-0065.mediawiki
2015-12-06 23:52:42 +08:00
Peter Todd
7cd2a7bdbb
Fix missing case statement at beginning of specification
...
Wasn't being displayed on github; adding an empty line prior to the spec
seems to fix this.
2015-12-05 18:06:38 +08:00
Peter Todd
0feb1209d0
Remove space in BIP66
...
Seems to be how people are writing BIP's these days.
2015-12-05 17:57:43 +08:00
Peter Todd
aa7cbf77a6
Minor: fix capitalisation
2015-12-05 17:57:31 +08:00
Chris Priest
bdd7c9ff76
renamed file
2015-12-04 15:48:37 -08:00
Matt David
b2db2eba41
- Add flow overview image
...
- Make Abstract more readable
- Update Sender definition and acronym descriptions
- Added comments to ReturnPaymentRequest definition
- Bold ECDH and AES Setup notes and added "(see below)" for reference
2015-12-04 15:16:32 -08:00
Chris Priest
f9d64e782b
formatting changes
2015-12-04 14:41:46 -08:00
Chris Priest
a07c8b62b3
formatting changes
2015-12-04 14:40:38 -08:00
Chris Priest
e97833688d
removed reference to version 2
2015-12-04 14:40:01 -08:00
Chris Priest
d982c11f87
fixed formatting
2015-12-04 14:37:51 -08:00
Chris Priest
632bf07252
typo
2015-12-04 14:34:53 -08:00
Chris Priest
3ff75f1ad2
added part about version field
2015-12-04 14:32:24 -08:00
Matt David
e71e57216b
- Fix section levels
...
- Add Message Interaction Details + new mimetypes
2015-12-04 13:26:50 -08:00
Matt David
845f24069b
Fix last links
2015-12-04 11:40:43 -08:00
Matt David
c91ec76f41
Remove anchors
2015-12-04 11:33:06 -08:00
Matt David
2d9b626d6c
Test anchor
2015-12-04 11:31:38 -08:00
Matt David
61cfbaefa7
Remove anchor template and use spans for anchors instead
2015-12-04 11:29:44 -08:00
Matt David
543409c7f7
Fix local anchors and links
2015-12-04 11:26:32 -08:00
Matt David
2c8bc2392b
Updated BIP based on colleague feedback
...
- Removed Requestor/Responder definitions
- Seperated ECDH secret point generation and AES-256 (CBC Mode) setup from individual steps (listed twice) and created it's own section
- Added InvoiceRequest Validation section
2015-12-04 11:10:01 -08:00
T Dev D
8dcddf5267
Add link to BIP47 test vectors
...
Results obtained upon implementing BIP47 for Samourai Wallet. Payment codes are calculated assuming v1 specification without use of BitMessage. Also assumes notification transaction from Alice to Bob has been sent.
2015-12-04 15:27:39 +00:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
9d3b68f8c4
Merge pull request #256 from techstoreclub/fix_bip0001_type
...
BIP-0001 Should be labeled as "Process" Type
2015-12-04 12:06:07 +01:00
Andy Chase
6f0c335b18
BIP-0001 Should be labeled as "Process" Type
...
Previously BIP-0001 listed in its header preamble that is was a "Standards Track"
type proposal. This conflicts with both its own definition of "Standards Track"
proposal as well as the type listed in PEP-0001 of which BIP-0001 is based on.
Defitions of each type of proposal:
A Standards Track BIP describes any change that affects most or all Bitcoin implementations.
An Informational BIP describes a Bitcoin design issue, or provides general guidelines or information to the Bitcoin community, but does not propose a new feature.
A Process BIP describes a process surrounding Bitcoin, or proposes a change to (or an event in) a process.
Specifically: "Any meta-BIP is also considered a Process BIP."
Based on these definitions BIP-0001 should have always been labeled as a "Process" BIP and this patch corrects this.
2015-12-04 02:48:43 -08:00
