Used the following `sed` command and manually verified the unstaged
changes. Special cases that were not committed included external links
to Wikipedia which are case-sensitive, links specific lines in code, a
link to a title with a slash that had to be cleaned up, and links to
citations on the BIP repository that contain an underscore.
```
sed -E -i '
s/(\[\[[^][]*#)([^]|]*)(\||\]\])/\1\L\2\E\3/g
:again
s/(\[\[[^][]*#)([^]|]*)([: _]+)([^]|]*)(\||\]\])/\1\2-\4\5/g
t again
' bip-0*mediawiki
```
```
sed -z -i 's/Author: /Authors: /' bip-0*.md
sed -z -i 's/Author: /Authors: /' bip-0*.mediawiki
```
Also align correctly in case of multiple authors.
```
sed -z -i 's/Type: Standards Track/Type: Specification/' bip-0*.md
sed -z -i 's/Type: Standards Track/Type: Specification/' bip-0*.mediawiki
```
After the scripted changes, the changes to BIP-40, BIP-41, and BIP-63
were undone, because it breaks CI.
These three BIPs only exist conceptually and their proposal documents
are missing which causes changes to them ot break the CI. I defer the
changes to these BIPs to a separate pull request to get CI to pass.
Although the variant "implementor" predominated for much of the late 20th
century, today "implementer" is considered standard, and the former spelling
triggers the typos spelling checker.
In all implementations and in the intended reading of "existing chain", cmpctblock messages should never be sent without having fully-validated every previous block it builds on, and it being a new candidate tip. Clarify that slightly more for the avoidance of doubt.
- Update all Accepted status to Proposed (renamed status)
- The BIP Comments preamble headers added to every BIP
- The License preamble headers have been added to all BIPs with a Copyright section
