1
0
mirror of https://github.com/bitcoin/bips.git synced 2026-01-19 15:03:08 +00:00

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Murch
a233bde4af
process: Standards Track ↦ Specification
```
sed -z -i 's/Type: Standards Track/Type: Specification/' bip-0*.md
sed -z -i 's/Type: Standards Track/Type: Specification/' bip-0*.mediawiki
```

After the scripted changes, the changes to BIP-40, BIP-41, and BIP-63
were undone, because it breaks CI.

These three BIPs only exist conceptually and their proposal documents
are missing which causes changes to them ot break the CI. I defer the
changes to these BIPs to a separate pull request to get CI to pass.
2026-01-12 14:22:40 -08:00
wigy
cfacb9d689
Applied standard terminology 2019-07-30 11:41:21 +02:00
wigy
308594e098
Updated BIP-0138 Comments-Summary
That opinion was unnoticed for more than a month now, maybe this helps getting counter-arguments.
2019-07-01 17:07:12 +02:00
Karl-Johan Alm
20f5021940
BIP-178: Reword abstract to indicate it's a bitcoin address type, not a public key type 2018-05-22 08:21:06 +09:00
Karl-Johan Alm
f667e7a3c7
[BIP-178] Version Extended WIF. 2018-05-21 08:31:50 +09:00