1
0
mirror of https://github.com/bitcoin/bips.git synced 2026-01-19 15:03:08 +00:00

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Murch
a233bde4af
process: Standards Track ↦ Specification
```
sed -z -i 's/Type: Standards Track/Type: Specification/' bip-0*.md
sed -z -i 's/Type: Standards Track/Type: Specification/' bip-0*.mediawiki
```

After the scripted changes, the changes to BIP-40, BIP-41, and BIP-63
were undone, because it breaks CI.

These three BIPs only exist conceptually and their proposal documents
are missing which causes changes to them ot break the CI. I defer the
changes to these BIPs to a separate pull request to get CI to pass.
2026-01-12 14:22:40 -08:00
Murch
66defbdc03
process: Deferred/Obsolete/Rejected/Replaced/Withdrawn ↦ Closed
```
sed -z -i 's/Status: Deferred/Status: Closed/' bip-0*.md
sed -z -i 's/Status: Deferred/Status: Closed/' bip-0*.mediawiki
sed -z -i 's/Status: Obsolete/Status: Closed/' bip-0*.md
sed -z -i 's/Status: Obsolete/Status: Closed/' bip-0*.mediawiki
sed -z -i 's/Status: Rejected/Status: Closed/' bip-0*.md
sed -z -i 's/Status: Rejected/Status: Closed/' bip-0*.mediawiki
sed -z -i 's/Status: Replaced/Status: Closed/' bip-0*.md
sed -z -i 's/Status: Replaced/Status: Closed/' bip-0*.mediawiki
sed -z -i 's/Status: Withdrawn/Status: Closed/' bip-0*.md
sed -z -i 's/Status: Withdrawn/Status: Closed/' bip-0*.mediawiki
```

```
    sed -i 's/| Deferred/| Closed/' README.mediawiki
    sed -i 's/| Obsolete/| Closed/' README.mediawiki
    sed -i 's/| Rejected/| Closed/' README.mediawiki
    sed -i 's/| Replaced/| Closed/' README.mediawiki
    sed -i 's/| Withdrawn/| Closed/' README.mediawiki
```
2026-01-12 14:22:36 -08:00
MarcoFalke
09d3d83d7e BIP 103: Withdrawn 2019-10-10 18:15:24 -04:00
MeshCollider
6295c1a095 Fixing spelling in multiple BIPs 2017-09-16 03:12:13 +00:00
Luke Dashjr
855eb22004 BIPs 30, 32, 62, 66, and 103: License under BSD-2-Clause terms
[Thursday, January 19, 2017] [7:46:36 PM UTC] <luke-jr> sipa: if you get a minute, can you give me at least a text-"verbal" ACK for some copyright license to put on BIPs 30, 32, 62, 66, and 103 please? is BSD-2-Clause okay?
[Thursday, January 19, 2017] [7:47:01 PM UTC] <sipa>    luke-jr: ACK on 2-clause BSD for 30,32,62,66,103
[Thursday, January 19, 2017] [7:47:13 PM UTC] <sipa>    (and for any other BIPs I contributed to)
2017-01-19 19:55:46 +00:00
Luke Dashjr
959fecc15b Promote BIP 2 Draft->Active, and implement it
- Update all Accepted status to Proposed (renamed status)
- The BIP Comments preamble headers added to every BIP
- The License preamble headers have been added to all BIPs with a Copyright section
2016-11-30 09:51:01 +00:00
Luke Dashjr
72f18918a8 Promote BIP 123 Draft->Active, and implement it 2016-11-30 09:45:33 +00:00
Jonathan Wilkins
23208ea690 adding Pieter Wuille's 'Block size following technological growth 2015-11-09 13:22:35 -08:00