bitcoin/bips
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/bitcoin/bips.git synced 2025-10-27 14:09:10 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity
1,893 Commits 6 Branches 0 Tags
Commit Graph

1893 Commits

This Branch
This Branch
All Branches
Author SHA1 Message Date
Luke Dashjr
31c45b611d BIP 9, 22 & 145: Use simple Yes/No rather than templates (which don't work on GitHub) 2016-04-23 20:34:29 +00:00
Luke Dashjr
2e5533849e Merge remote-tracking branch 'personal-github/segwit_gbt_updates_20160330' into segwit_gbt_updates_20160330 2016-04-23 20:20:53 +00:00
Luke Dashjr
4683a9b714 BIP 9 (& 145): Switch to rules/vbavailable/vbrequired GBT interface 2016-04-23 20:20:13 +00:00
Luke Dashjr
7e99bbf958 bip-0009: Recommend name "bipN" 2016-04-23 20:12:41 +00:00
Luke Dashjr
5f697ea543 Merge branch 'master' into segwit_gbt_updates_20160330 2016-04-23 20:02:53 +00:00
Luke-Jr
cf51071ccd Merge pull request #376 from jl2012/bip141p2sh 
BIP141: Add P2SH-P2WPKH example and clarify block cost
 2016-04-23 20:02:00 +00:00
jl2012
f245646f8b BIP141: Block cost clrification 2016-04-23 16:25:53 +02:00
jl2012
43c34e846b Add P2SH-P2WPKH example 2016-04-23 08:26:48 +02:00
Luke-Jr
cd1932a67a Merge pull request #375 from voisine/patch-4 
fix BIP141 nested P2SH scriptSig byte representation
 2016-04-23 03:33:13 +00:00
Aaron Voisine
d72c1bfc71 Update bip-0141.mediawiki 
The byte representation of "<0 <32-byte-hash>>" is "0x220020{32-byte-hash}"

What was listed here would be the byte representation of "0 <32-byte-hash>". The text explains that there is only one item in scriptSig, so I'm guessing the byte representation is wrong. Also the corrected byte representation would produce the same sig/pubkey described in P2WSH after following the bip16 rules.
 2016-04-22 08:44:29 -07:00
Luke-Jr
932d0750f2 Merge pull request #374 from kanzure/bip143-signaturehash 
BIP143: Explicitly mention the SignatureHash function
 2016-04-20 19:41:40 +00:00
Luke-Jr
a80fbaf619 Merge pull request #373 from kanzure/bip143-typofix 
BIP143: fix typo ("including")
 2016-04-20 19:41:23 +00:00
Luke-Jr
5160fc71be Merge pull request #372 from jl2012/patch-16 
BIP143 clarifying semantics of ACP|SINGLE
 2016-04-20 19:40:42 +00:00
Bryan Bishop
a488367502 BIP143: explicitly mention the SignatureHash function 
The purpose of BIP143 is to propose an updated SignatureHash function
but "sighash" only appears near the end buried in the text. By
explicitly mentioning the SignatureHash function, readers can more
readily understand the context of the proposal.
 2016-04-20 12:45:48 -05:00
Johnson Lau
c1ef3a05e3 BIP143 clarifying semantics of ACP|SINGLE 2016-04-21 01:39:30 +08:00
Bryan Bishop
4cb4534fd9 BIP143: fix typo ("including") 2016-04-20 12:29:44 -05:00
Justus Ranvier
283aa14f77
add version 2 section for bloom filter-based notifications 2016-04-19 13:08:38 -05:00
Justus Ranvier
37a35b5565
add recommended handling for notification tx change outputs 2016-04-19 13:03:13 -05:00
Justus Ranvier
8b11b61981
explain the usage of versions with regards to payment code behavior 2016-04-19 13:01:55 -05:00
Luke-Jr
5d0b400823 Merge pull request #371 from justusranvier/bip47 
BIP-0047: Clarify usage and format of outpoints
 2016-04-17 22:17:57 +00:00
Justus Ranvier
97dafa75b3
BIP-0047: Clarify usage and format of outpoints 
Introduce the terms 'designated input' and 'designated pubkey' for clarity

Update reference link for outpoint to a more canonical source
 2016-04-17 09:52:53 -05:00
Luke-Jr
3ff0772bb2 Merge pull request #369 from instagibbs/bip114clar 
Some clarification on path meaning and structure
 2016-04-14 10:38:10 +00:00
Luke-Jr
6026a0b599 Merge pull request #370 from jl2012/bip114ref 
BIP114: Clarifying reference implementation
 2016-04-14 10:37:53 +00:00
jl2012
3ef07340b4 BIP114: Clarifying reference implementation 2016-04-14 00:43:16 +08:00
instagibbs
58409dd0e8 Some clarification on path meaning and structure 2016-04-13 11:48:20 -04:00
Luke Dashjr
6c71b46623 Merge BIP 114: Merkelized Abstract Syntax Tree 2016-04-12 20:20:35 +00:00
Luke Dashjr
952ba4ad16 Assign BIP 114: Merkelized Abstract Syntax Tree 2016-04-12 20:20:06 +00:00
Luke-Jr
2b478b5f0a Merge pull request #367 from jl2012/bip141commitment 
BIP141: commitment clarification. BIP144: new diagram
 2016-04-08 22:03:25 +00:00
jl2012
ee744caca9 BIP141: commitment clarification. BIP144: new diagram 2016-04-09 03:13:37 +08:00
Luke-Jr
5bf411856e Merge pull request #1 from jl2012/patch-13 
BIP141: Sigop clarification
 2016-04-05 07:36:24 +00:00
Johnson Lau
a6cc319846 Update bip-0141.mediawiki 2016-04-05 13:03:34 +08:00
jl2012
735a556129 Create BIP MAST 2016-04-02 01:06:35 +08:00
Luke-Jr
4cdb00287d Merge pull request #366 from btcdrak/patch-7 
Clarify what remains "to be decided"
 2016-03-31 19:23:30 +00:00
฿tcDrak
9c0d407b10 Clarify what remains "to be decided" 2016-03-31 15:39:33 +01:00
Johnson Lau
cacf39b057 BIP141: Sigop clarification 2016-03-31 14:22:36 +08:00
Luke Dashjr
2fa7fb9b5c BIP 141: Specify VB name 2016-03-30 22:47:40 +00:00
Luke Dashjr
161b39fa68 BIP 145: Update for BIP 9 2016-03-30 22:47:40 +00:00
Luke Dashjr
12a2131bb4 BIP 9: GBT specification 2016-03-30 22:46:18 +00:00
Luke Dashjr
b0b65ceede BIP 9: Add softfork deployment "name" 2016-03-30 22:46:18 +00:00
Luke Dashjr
b8467dfb7c BIP 9: Clarify nVersion interpretation and bit order 2016-03-30 22:46:18 +00:00
Luke Dashjr
a5447e0c4b BIP 141 & 145: Clarify sigop interaction 2016-03-30 22:46:18 +00:00
Matt David
8bf7d90d20 - Update HTTPS to be TLS-protected HTTP 
- Add Updated Messages section to describe the status_code and status_message
- Separated Message and Communication Errors into Payment Protocol Errors and Communication Errors
- Add first draft Payment Protocol error codes
- Update InvoiceRequest Message Creation description amount example to return Payment Protocol error in the case of an issue with the amount.
 2016-03-29 15:49:49 -07:00
Luke-Jr
ba16f16742 Merge pull request #364 from jl2012/patch-13 
BIP143: Provide private key used in the example
 2016-03-28 21:24:30 +00:00
Luke-Jr
51319e55c6 Merge pull request #363 from CodeShark/bip141_edits 
Witness validation logic trigger clarifications
 2016-03-28 21:24:18 +00:00
Luke-Jr
f8c439a704 Merge pull request #360 from luke-jr/bip0002_deferred 
Defer BIP 2
 2016-03-28 21:23:35 +00:00
Johnson Lau
cb81c9ab5f BIP143: Provide private key used in the example 2016-03-29 01:19:50 +08:00
Eric Lombrozo
ee7b3ab4c0 Witness validation logic trigger clarifications 2016-03-25 01:35:01 -04:00
Luke-Jr
4650545169 Merge pull request #361 from btcdrak/patch-5 
Remove deployment section
 2016-03-21 17:23:05 +00:00
฿tcDrak
932d75e24f Remove deployment section. 
Now we know we will use BIP9 version bits, remove references to ISM() and leave TDB
as was done with BIP68,112 and 113.
 2016-03-21 10:09:58 +00:00
Luke Dashjr
2fd1811331 Defer BIP 2 2016-03-18 20:03:56 +00:00