mirror of
				https://github.com/bitcoin/bips.git
				synced 2025-11-03 14:19:40 +00:00 
			
		
		
		
	bip3: Fix SPDX id of Open Publication License
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									e5748c9997
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						85a248f68e
					
				@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ However, BIPs predating this proposal were allowed under other terms, and should
 | 
				
			|||||||
when no other license is granted:
 | 
					when no other license is granted:
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
* PD: Released into the public domain
 | 
					* PD: Released into the public domain
 | 
				
			||||||
* OPL: [Open Publication License, version 1.0](http://opencontent.org/openpub/)
 | 
					* OPUBL-1.0: [Open Publication License, version 1.0](http://opencontent.org/openpub/)
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
## BIP Editors
 | 
					## BIP Editors
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
@ -735,7 +735,7 @@ feedback, and helpful comments.
 | 
				
			|||||||
    * PD: 42
 | 
					    * PD: 42
 | 
				
			||||||
    * CC0-1.0: 23
 | 
					    * CC0-1.0: 23
 | 
				
			||||||
    * BSD-3-Clause: 19
 | 
					    * BSD-3-Clause: 19
 | 
				
			||||||
    * OPL: 5
 | 
					    * OPUBL-1.0: 5
 | 
				
			||||||
    * CC-BY-SA-4.0: 4
 | 
					    * CC-BY-SA-4.0: 4
 | 
				
			||||||
    * FSFAP: 3
 | 
					    * FSFAP: 3
 | 
				
			||||||
    * MIT: 2
 | 
					    * MIT: 2
 | 
				
			||||||
@ -773,7 +773,7 @@ feedback, and helpful comments.
 | 
				
			|||||||
      and therefore CC-BY-SA-4.0 (and the GPL-flavors) is no longer considered acceptable for new BIPs. As mentioned
 | 
					      and therefore CC-BY-SA-4.0 (and the GPL-flavors) is no longer considered acceptable for new BIPs. As mentioned
 | 
				
			||||||
      above, existing BIPs will retain their original licensing.
 | 
					      above, existing BIPs will retain their original licensing.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
    Why are OPL and Public Domain no longer acceptable for new BIPs?
 | 
					    Why are Open Publication License and Public Domain no longer acceptable for new BIPs?
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
    * Public domain is not universally recognised as a legitimate action, thus it is inadvisable.
 | 
					    * Public domain is not universally recognised as a legitimate action, thus it is inadvisable.
 | 
				
			||||||
    * The OPL is generally regarded as obsolete, and not a license suitable for new publications.
 | 
					    * The Open Publication License is generally regarded as obsolete, and not a license suitable for new publications.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
				
			|||||||
		Loading…
	
	
			
			x
			
			
		
	
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user