bitcoin/bips
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/bitcoin/bips.git synced 2025-10-27 14:09:10 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

bip3: Fix SPDX id of Open Publication License

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Tim Ruffing 2025-07-09 10:38:28 +02:00
parent e5748c9997
commit 85a248f68e
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
bip-0003.md
View File

@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ However, BIPs predating this proposal were allowed under other terms, and should
when no other license is granted:
* PD: Released into the public domain
* OPL: [Open Publication License, version 1.0](http://opencontent.org/openpub/)
* OPUBL-1.0: [Open Publication License, version 1.0](http://opencontent.org/openpub/)
## BIP Editors
@ -735,7 +735,7 @@ feedback, and helpful comments.
* PD: 42
* CC0-1.0: 23
* BSD-3-Clause: 19
* OPL: 5
* OPUBL-1.0: 5
* CC-BY-SA-4.0: 4
* FSFAP: 3
* MIT: 2
@ -773,7 +773,7 @@ feedback, and helpful comments.
and therefore CC-BY-SA-4.0 (and the GPL-flavors) is no longer considered acceptable for new BIPs. As mentioned
above, existing BIPs will retain their original licensing.
Why are OPL and Public Domain no longer acceptable for new BIPs?
Why are Open Publication License and Public Domain no longer acceptable for new BIPs?
* Public domain is not universally recognised as a legitimate action, thus it is inadvisable.
* The OPL is generally regarded as obsolete, and not a license suitable for new publications.
* The Open Publication License is generally regarded as obsolete, and not a license suitable for new publications.