bitcoin/bips
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/bitcoin/bips.git synced 2025-05-12 12:03:29 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

Add ref for why sighash_all is required

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Andrew Toth 2024-12-23 20:19:20 -05:00
parent 9952599f32
commit 651ffdded8
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 60007AFC8938B018
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
bip-PSBT-SP.mediawiki
View File

@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ If any output does not have PSBT_OUT_SCRIPT set, the Signer must not yet add a s
The Signer should additionally compute the silent payment addresses, optionally showing this data to the user instead of the computed segwit v1 addresses.
If a sighash type is provided and there are silent payment outputs present, the signer must fail if the sighash type is not SIGHASH_ALL.
If a sighash type is not provided and there are silent payment outputs present, the signer must sign using SIGHASH_ALL.
If a sighash type is not provided and there are silent payment outputs present, the signer must sign using SIGHASH_ALL.<ref name="why_use_sighash_all"> ''' Why use only SIGHASH_ALL?''' BIP352 allows signing with SIGHASH_NONE and SIGHASH_SINGLE. However, silent payment capable PSBTs compute the output scripts deterministically based on the number and position of silent payment codes with the same scan key. SIGHASH_NONE and SIGHASH_SINGLE allow changing the amount or position of silent payment codes with the same scan and spend keys, which would invalidate computed output scripts.</ref>
====Computing the DLEQ Proof====