Found while building the long-running sync. One item was orphaned by that
change; the rest was already dead and only became visible because the subsystem
was being read closely. Written down rather than deleted because several pieces
are one decision away from being wanted, and those decisions are not the sync
change's to make.
Every claim is "this identifier appears exactly once in composeApp/src, at its
own declaration", with the two things that method cannot see called out: Room
DAO methods are reached through generated code, and Compose entry points can be
invoked without a textual reference. The DAO cluster is flagged as the least
certain for exactly that reason.
Three findings are more than leftovers:
- RelaysSocketManager.userRelays is a field nothing ever writes. The
`userRelays` inside observeRelays is a different, shadowing local, so the
single-argument publishEvent always takes its FALLBACK_RELAYS branch and the
user's own relay list is never used for publishing. That is a bug wearing
dead code's clothes, and the fix is to populate the field, not to delete it.
- NostrPublisherRepository is entirely unreferenced, and it is the only
consumer of CachingImportRepository.importEvents. RelayPool and
RelaysSocketManager each take a cachingImportRepository parameter they store
and never dereference, satisfied by NO_OP_CACHING_IMPORT_REPOSITORY — so the
whole seam is a parameter passed from nowhere to nothing. Removing the
publisher lets the interface and both parameters go with it.
- sendAUTH is unused because NIP-42 is unimplemented, not because it is
surplus. AuthMessage is parsed and dropped, so a relay answering CLOSED with
auth-required is retried forever and can never succeed. Deleting sendAUTH
means deciding against authenticated relays; that is worth doing on purpose
or not at all. sendCOUNT and CountMessage are a similar matched pair — both
go or neither, since a CountMessage cannot arrive if nothing sends a COUNT.
isRecommendedRelay on the two request entities is separated out as its own risk
class: never written, never read, but a Room column, so it wants a migration
rather than a delete.
Ends with an order to do it in, cheapest and least risky first.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
12 KiB
Unreferenced code in the sync and relay stack
An inventory of code nothing calls, found while building the long-running chat sync (see long-running-sync.md). Some of it was orphaned by that change; most of it was already dead and only became visible because the subsystem was being read closely.
None of it is removed yet. It is written down rather than deleted because several items are one decision away from being wanted, and that decision is not the sync change's to make.
How this was checked
Every claim below is "the identifier appears exactly once in
composeApp/src, at its own declaration", verified with a script that tokenises
every .kt file outside build/ and counts occurrences:
grep -rn "\bidentifierName\b" --include=*.kt composeApp/src | grep -v '/build/'
Two things that method cannot see, so each item was also read in context:
- Room DAOs are called through generated code as
database.xDao().method(), so the method name does appear at the call site and a genuinely unused DAO query still counts as one occurrence. The DAO section below is therefore the least certain. - Compose entry points and
@Composablefunctions invoked fromsetContentor navigation graphs may be reached without a textual reference.
Orphaned by the live-sync change
ChatRoomListViewModel.scheduleSynchronization —
ChatRoomListViewModel.kt:80
No longer called by initiate(). It was kept as the entry point for a
user-initiated refresh, which is the one thing the live tier does not answer —
but no refresh affordance exists in the UI, so today it is unreferenced.
It also now duplicates LiveSubscriptionManager.queueCatchUpSynchronization,
which queues the same two negentropy requests on every foreground, including the
first one after launch. Drift between the two is harmless (a negentropy request
is keyed on a hash of its filter, and both are valid reconciliations), but there
is no reason for two copies.
Decide one of: wire a pull-to-refresh to it, or delete it. Deleting it also
orphans nostrRepository in that view model, which ripples into its factory
and into HomeScreen — the reason it was left alone rather than removed in the
same commit.
Dead on arrival, in the relay stack
Each of these predates the sync work.
| what | where | note |
|---|---|---|
RelayPool.removeRelays |
RelayPool.kt:119 | never called; changeRelays and closePool cover every path that removes a relay |
RelayPool.hasRelays |
RelayPool.kt:167 | never called |
RelayPool.transformWhileEventsAreIncoming |
RelayPool.kt:482 | private, never called. Superseded by completeOnSubscriptionEnd, which ends a flow on EOSE/CLOSED/NEG-ERR rather than on "the last message was not an event" |
| the commented-out publish gate | RelayPool.kt:543-556 | the only thing keeping import kotlinx.coroutines.flow.transform (:30) alive |
RelaysSocketManager.clearRelayPools |
RelaysSocketManager.kt:100 | private, never called. Nothing tears the pool down on sign-out |
RelaysSocketManager.tryConnectingToAllRelays |
RelaysSocketManager.kt:132 | never called; the only caller of RelayPool.tryConnectingToRelay, which is otherwise dead too |
the commented tryConnectingToUserRelay |
RelaysSocketManager.kt:140 | |
NostrIncomingMessage?.verifyOrThrow |
NostrIncomingMessage.kt:59 | never called. It also treats any NOTICE as a failure, which is wrong for the reason filterByEventId documents — a NOTICE has no subscription id and reaches every collector |
String?.decodeFromJsonStringOrNull |
CommonJson.kt:37 | never called |
NostrSocketClientImpl.compressMessage |
NostrSocketClientImpl.kt:384 | already carries @Suppress("unused"). Outgoing compression is not a thing any relay here asks for |
RelaysSocketManager.userRelays is a field that is never written
Worth separating from the table, because it does not read as dead — it reads as a bug.
private val userRelays = mutableSetOf<RelayDTO>() // nothing ever adds to this
The userRelays at :83
is a different, shadowing local inside observeRelays. The field itself is
only ever read, at :107:
return if (userRelays.isNotEmpty()) { ...publish to the user's relays... }
else { ...publish to FALLBACK_RELAYS... }
So the single-argument publishEvent always takes the fallback branch, and
the user's own relay list is never used for publishing. Either populate the
field from updateRelayPools or delete it and the branch; leaving a permanently
false condition in place is the one option that keeps the bug.
The unused halves of the socket protocol
NostrSocketClient declares five send methods. Only sendEVENT and
sendMESSAGE are ever called — everything else in the pool serialises its own
command with OptimizedJsonMapper and goes through sendMESSAGE.
| declaration | impl |
|---|---|
sendREQ :37 |
:349 |
sendCLOSE :31 |
:361 |
sendCOUNT :33 |
:354 |
sendAUTH :29 |
:365 |
Removing them also orphans buildNostrREQMessage, buildNostrCOUNTMessage,
buildNostrCLOSEMessage and buildNostrAUTHMessage in
NostrOutgoingMessageBuilder.
Two of the four are worth keeping for a named reason rather than out of habit:
sendAUTHis the NIP-42 hole.NostrIncomingMessage.AuthMessage(:34) is parsed and then dropped — nothing anywhere handles an AUTH challenge. A relay that answers CLOSED withauth-requiredis currently retried with backoff forever and will never succeed.sendAUTHis half of the fix, so delete it only alongside a decision not to support authenticated relays.sendCOUNTandCountMessage(:38) are a matched pair with no caller.CountMessageis parsed and admitted byfilterBySubscriptionId, but since nothing sends a COUNT it can never arrive. Both go, or neither.
sendREQ and sendCLOSE have no such argument — the pool does not use them and
would not start.
Dead all the way down: the publisher chain
NostrPublisherRepository —
NostrPublisherRepository.kt:15
The whole class is unreferenced: nothing constructs it, and neither of its two
methods (signPublishImportNostrEvent, publishRelayList) is called. Publishing
goes through the broadcast queue in SynchronizationViewModel instead.
It matters beyond itself because it is the only consumer of
CachingImportRepository.importEvents. RelayPool and RelaysSocketManager
both take a cachingImportRepository constructor parameter, store it, and never
dereference it — and SynchronizationViewModel satisfies that parameter with
NO_OP_CACHING_IMPORT_REPOSITORY. So the entire caching-import seam is a
parameter passed from nowhere to nothing.
Removing NostrPublisherRepository and the two unused constructor parameters
would let CachingImportRepository go with them.
Dead columns (need a migration)
isRecommendedRelay on both
SynchronizeNostrEventRequest.kt:40
and
NegentropySynchronizeRequest.kt:39
is never written by any caller (every construction takes the false default)
and never read.
A different risk class from everything else here: these are Room columns, so removing them is a schema change with a migration, not a delete. Cheap to leave; worth folding into the next migration that touches those tables.
Wider sweep, needing per-item judgement
The same sweep across all of composeApp/src turns up ~99 single-occurrence
function declarations. Most are outside the sync stack and were not read in
context. Two clusters stand out and are recorded here so the next person does
not have to re-derive them:
- Unused DAO queries — roughly 30, concentrated in
BroadcastNostrEventReceiptDao,BroadcastNostrEventRequestDao,UnsignedNostrEventDao,RepostedRelationDao,QuotedRelationDao,InReplyToRelationDao,ReactionDaoandZapDao. MostlygetAllX()/getXById()shapes that look like they were written to round out a DAO rather than because something needed them. Cheap to delete and cheap to re-add, but see the Room caveat above: confirm each against the generated implementation, not just by grep. - Bech32/credential helpers in
Credentials.kt —
assureValidNpub,assureValidPubKeyHex,hexToNoteHrp,urlToLnUrlHrp,bechToBytesOrThrow. A conversion toolkit where only some conversions are used. Worth keeping as a set if the intent is a complete encoding surface; worth deleting if not.
Suggested order, if this gets done
NostrPublisherRepository+ the twocachingImportRepositoryparameters +CachingImportRepository. Largest reduction, zero behavioural risk, and it removes a constructor parameter from two classes at the centre of the relay stack.- The relay-stack table above, plus the two commented-out blocks and the
transformimport they keep alive. userRelays— but as a fix, not a deletion, unless publishing to the user's own relay list is deliberately not wanted.sendREQ/sendCLOSE, keepingsendAUTHandsendCOUNTpending the NIP-42 and COUNT decisions.ChatRoomListViewModel.scheduleSynchronization, once there is a refresh affordance or a decision that there will not be one.isRecommendedRelay, with the next migration that touches those tables.