Files
mantra-kmp/docs
Kgothatso Ngako a315b86918 feat: say in the transcript that a member is being caught up
Phase 7 of docs/member-archive.md, in part. Three chat types --
`TYPE_ARCHIVE_REQUESTED`, `TYPE_ARCHIVE_SENT`, `TYPE_ARCHIVE_RECEIVED` -- so a
room that fills itself in explains itself once.

Without this the archive is entirely silent by design: it files no line per
applied payload, because `ChatMessage` has an `autoGenerate` primary key and
every payload would mint a fresh row on every pass of the sweep. The result was a
member joining a working group and watching a room populate with no account of
where any of it came from, which is worse than the noise it avoided.

**One line per archive, not per page.** The received line is written when the
request stamp is cleared, which is as close as this can get: an archive's pages
are not distinguishable from each other at apply time, and clearing the stamp is
exactly the moment a catch-up stops being pending. There is a test that delivers
a payload per page, backwards, so the sweep runs repeatedly over many pages, and
asserts the transcript holds two lines.

**A push behind a Welcome writes nothing**, because the room was never asked. It
lands before the member has opened the room, and "caught up on work you have not
seen yet" is a line about nothing. Also tested.

**The received line names no sender.** An archive can be assembled from pages
sent by more than one member, so attributing the catch-up to one would be a guess
dressed as a fact. The sent line does name its recipient, written into the
content the way the invite line writes one -- which does not follow a rename, and
is the accepted cost for a line about something that happened once.

**Content is whole sentences**, so these stay out of the AUTHORED sets and
nothing prefixes a name to them. And they are added to `ARCHIVE_TYPES` with a
matching arm in the transcript, because the failure mode for a missed set is
silent: the line renders as a chat bubble, looking exactly like a member having
said "Caught up on 12 items". Icons per type rather than the `PanTool` fallback.

**Two items from this phase are deliberately not done**, rather than written
without the app in front of me: the banner saying a room is catching up, and a
"Send history" action on the member row. The first is UI state plumbed through a
view model into a layout and the transcript line covers the same ground; the
second is a convenience, since both real paths are already automatic. Both are
written up in the plan as outstanding, along with the thing this phase was also
meant to say and does not: that an archive does not make its recipient able to
sign, and does not carry the translated text.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-06 14:34:19 +02:00
..

mantra docs

Notes on the parts of this app whose behaviour is not recoverable by reading the code alone — where the reasoning lives in a protocol, a failure mode that is silent, or a decision that looked arbitrary and was not.

document covers
shared-key-ceremony.md ChillDKG over NIP-17: the rounds, the approval gates, the chat transcript, participant ordering
shared-key-derivation.md deriving further keys from the group's threshold key with FROST tweaks — why not BIP32, why no chain code, and the one rule that must not be broken
frost-batch-signing.md signing several events in one ceremony — why one nonce can never cover two messages, and the phased schema, wire and UI work that follows from it
marmot-membership.md how members join an MLS group, and the epoch race that makes a missing member look like a successful invite
member-archive.md handing a member added after the work was done the group's signed record — why the events are not on the wire at all, and why the room's id is enough to verify them
marmot-direct-messages.md a one-to-one message inside a group as a stock NIP-59 gift wrap — what its MIP-03 carve-out costs, why the sender cannot read their own, and the one query that would broadcast it
mls-skipped-keys.md why a group event that arrives a moment late is dropped for good, which flows trigger it, the quartz fix, and the partial mitigation in this app
long-running-sync.md the chat subscriptions that stay open instead of pulling once per screen — why the request queue could not simply hold one, and how the group filter follows the room list
dead-code.md code in the sync and relay stack that nothing calls, why each piece is still there, and which of it is a bug rather than a leftover
jvm-target.md what desktop support cost, phased — why the native chain was already done, why an empty source set in our phoenix fork was the real blocker, and why DAO tests need none of it

Start with the ceremony if you are new to this area; the Marmot notes all assume it. Read the skipped-keys note before debugging any "the other device never got it" report — it is silent, and it looks like every other kind of delivery failure. The sync note stands alone, and the dead-code inventory reads as a follow-up to it. The batch-signing note is a phased plan that has been built: read it after the derivation note, whose one rule is the same one it is built around. The member archive note is a phased plan that has not been built, and reads as the membership note's unanswered half: what a member who joins late can be given, and the one thing they cannot. The jvm-target note is unrelated to all of them: it is a build and packaging story.