docs: plan the second pull from the fork, with its dry run already done

The upstream moved the day the first pull landed: ten commits on
curated/curated, 86cb876b..29027f2b, that let a device hold several
profiles and move between them, and with them the fork's first schema
migration, version 20. The first plan named them the next pull and said
the schema change earned a decision of its own. This is that plan, and
unlike the first it was written after the dry run rather than before it,
so its numbers are measured: rewrite from the fork point in 103 s, ten
commits replayed onto 776455ec with nine clean and one resolved by rule,
both compilers clean, jvmTest 826 -> 868 and testDebugUnitTest 413 -> 420
with no failures, every audit budget met, and 20.json regenerated
byte-identical after a full build.

The verdict is all ten, because the line is one feature and seven fixes
braided together and four of the fixes are live on Mantra today with one
profile: the relay observer that is never all cancelled, the read-only
inbox that stays closed after its nsec is pasted, the DataStore race on
desktop, and the startup screen's wallet-worded literals. Four decisions:
take the whole line rather than carve the fixes out of five commits; take
upstream's version 20 verbatim and adopt the rule that whichever tree
migrates first owns the number; the one conflict is Mantra's own import
from 39fb64b6, resolved theirs, which closes one of the first plan's owed
reverse-pulls; and two of the device's profiles in one group is a Mantra
follow-up before release, since ChatRoom is keyed by the group id alone.

What changed in the method: Mantra's tree is no longer a superset of the
fork's, so the exactness check becomes "the residual between the trees is
the same before and after the pull, file for file", and the plan gives the
commands. The replay driver gains the one rule the dry run needed, with
its reason. The README gets the row and a reading-order sentence, and the
first plan points forward from the paragraph that predicted this one.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

docs/scripts/curated-replay.py

@@ -2,7 +2,8 @@
 """Land rewritten Curated commits on a Mantra branch, one cherry-pick at a time.
 
 The companion of curated-unbrand.py, and the second half of docs/curated-to-mantra.md's
-pipeline as it was actually run. The rewrite (filter-branch with curated-unbrand.py as the
+pipeline as it was actually run; docs/curated-to-mantra-profiles.md is the second pull it
+served, and added the one rule that pull needed. The rewrite (filter-branch with curated-unbrand.py as the
 tree filter and a `Pulled-From: curated/curated@<sha>` trailer stamped by its message
 filter) leaves a branch `tmp/curated-src` in Mantra's names; this replays commits off it
 by their *original* sha, in the order you give, onto the current branch of <worktree>.
@@ -56,10 +57,12 @@ THEIRS = {
     ('42f3a697', 'composeApp/src/commonMain/kotlin/press/mantra/compose/network/relays/RelaysSocketManager.kt'),
     ('42f3a697', 'composeApp/src/commonMain/kotlin/press/mantra/compose/ui/view/model/NavigationViewModel.kt'),
     ('e3cc23ae', UI + 'KeyRecoveryScreen.kt'),
+    ('2f420230', 'composeApp/src/commonMain/kotlin/press/mantra/compose/ui/view/model/CreateProfileViewModel.kt'),
 }
 THEIRS_WHY = {
     '42f3a697': "this commit's import block taken whole -- Mantra had already moved the nostrPublicKey() import to the library's (39fb64b6), and this commit removes the call it served",
     'e3cc23ae': 'the class comment this commit rewrites is taken whole; the only base difference was the dropped rebrand capitalising the brand in one word of it',
+    '2f420230': "this commit's import block taken whole -- Mantra had already moved the nostrPublicKey() import to the library's (39fb64b6), and this commit removes the seed derivation that import served; the file is identical on both sides afterwards (docs/curated-to-mantra-profiles.md, the third decision)",
 }
 DELETE = {('55664cc7', 'composeApp/src/jvmTest/kotlin/press/mantra/compose/ui/composable/GroupNostrProfileSectionJvmTest.kt')}