secp256k1_memclear has the side effect of undefining bytes for
valgrind checks. In some cases, we may want to zero bytes
but allow subsequent reads. So we split memclear into
memclear_explicit, which makes no guarantees about the content
of the buffer on return, and memzero_explicit, which guarantees
zero value on return.
Change the memset in partial_sign to use memzero_explicit.
765ef53335 Clear _gej instances after point multiplication to avoid potential leaks (Sebastian Falbesoner)
349e6ab916 Introduce separate _clear functions for hash module (Tim Ruffing)
99cc9fd6d0 Don't rely on memset to set signed integers to 0 (Tim Ruffing)
97c57f42ba Implement various _clear() functions with secp256k1_memclear() (Tim Ruffing)
9bb368d146 Use secp256k1_memclear() to clear stack memory instead of memset() (Tim Ruffing)
e3497bbf00 Separate between clearing memory and setting to zero in tests (Tim Ruffing)
d79a6ccd43 Separate secp256k1_fe_set_int( . , 0 ) from secp256k1_fe_clear() (Tim Ruffing)
1c08126222 Add secp256k1_memclear() for clearing secret data (Tim Ruffing)
e7d384488e Don't clear secrets in pippenger implementation (Tim Ruffing)
Pull request description:
This PR picks up #636 (which in turn picked up #448, so this is take number three) and is essentially a rebase on master.
Some changes to the original PR:
* the clearing function now has the `secp256k1_` prefix again, since the related helper `_memczero` got it as well (see PR #835 / commit e89278f211)
* the original commit b17a7df8145a6a86d49c354c7e7b59a432ea5346 ("Make _set_fe_int( . , 0 ) set magnitude to 0") is not needed anymore, since it was already applied in PR #943 (commit d49011f54c)
* clearing of stack memory with `secp256k1_memclear` is now also done on modules that have been newly introduced since then, i.e. schnorr and ellswift (of course, there is still no guarantee that all places where clearing is necessary are covered)
So far I haven't looked at any disassembly and possible performance implications yet (there were some concerns expressed in https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/pull/636#issuecomment-620118629), happy to go deeper there if this gets Concept ACKed.
The proposed method of using a memory barrier to prevent optimizating away the memset is still used in BoringSSL (where it was originally picked up from) and in the Linux Kernel, see e.g. 5af122c3df/crypto/mem.c (L335) and d456068672/include/linux/string.h (L348) / d456068672/include/linux/compiler.h (L102)Fixes#185.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
reACK 765ef53335
real-or-random:
ACK 765ef53335
Tree-SHA512: 5a034d5ad14178c06928022459f3d4f0877d06f576b24ab07b86b3608b0b3e9273217b8309a1db606f024f3032731f13013114b1e0828964b578814d1efb2959
Quoting sipa (see https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/pull/1479#discussion_r1790079414):
"When performing an EC multiplication A = aG for secret a, the resulting
_affine_ coordinates of A are presumed to not leak information about a (ECDLP),
but the same is not necessarily true for the Jacobian coordinates that come
out of our multiplication algorithm."
For the ECDH point multiplication result, the result in Jacobi coordinates should be
cleared not only to avoid leaking the scalar, but even more so as it's a representation
of the resulting shared secret.
This gives the caller more control about whether the state should
be cleaned (= should be considered secret). Moreover, it gives the
caller the possibility to clean a hash struct without finalizing it.
All of the invocations of secp256k1_memclear() operate on stack
memory and happen after the function is done with the memory object.
This commit replaces existing memset() invocations and also adds
secp256k1_memclear() to code locations where clearing was missing;
there is no guarantee that this commit covers all code locations
where clearing is necessary.
Co-Authored-By: isle2983 <isle2983@yahoo.com>
The area marked as non-secret exceeds the nonce_pts array in the
second iteration of the for loop. Fix that by passing the correct
size to the _declassify call.
