Infinity isn't currently needed here, but correctly handling it is a
little more safe against future changes.
Update docs for it to make it clear that it is not constant time in A
(the input point). It never was constant time in Q (and would be a little
complicated to make constant time in A).
If it was later made constant time in A, infinity support would be easy
to preserve, e.g. by running it on a dummy value and cmoving infinity into
the output.
bef448f9af248dba016883401de07b431f3e686e cmake: Fix library ABI versioning (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This change emulates Libtool to make sure Libtool and CMake agree on the ABI version.
To test, one needs to simulate a release with backward-compatible API changes, which means the following changes in `configure.ac` and `CMakeLists.txt`:
- incrementing of `*_LIB_VERSION_CURRENT`
- setting `*_LIB_VERSION_REVISION` to zero
- incrementing of `*_LIB_VERSION_AGE`
ACKs for top commit:
real-or-random:
ACK bef448f9af248dba016883401de07b431f3e686e diff looks good and I tested on Linux
Tree-SHA512: f7551fc7377ea50c8bc32d14108a034a1f91ebbb63d5fec562e5cc28416637834b9a4dcba3692df1780adcd1212ad4f238dc0219ab5add68bd88a5a458572ee5
An executable target in the `COMMAND` option will automatically be
replaced by the location of the executable created at build time.
This change fixes tests for Windows binaries using Wine.
71f746c057a66d5ae0dfdb5d439bc49592c0d16e cmake: Include `include` directory for subtree builds (Hennadii Stepanov)
5431b9decdbbdf30c5c5f2aed4b59662f5c681a2 cmake: Make `SECP256K1_INSTALL` default depend on `PROJECT_IS_TOP_LEVEL` (Hennadii Stepanov)
162608cc982538906e775d0c549aff2de5dee413 cmake: Emulate `PROJECT_IS_TOP_LEVEL` for CMake<3.21 (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR:
1. Emulates [`PROJECT_IS_TOP_LEVEL`](https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/variable/PROJECT_IS_TOP_LEVEL.html) variable for CMake versions where it is not available.
2. Makes the `SECP256K1_INSTALL` option dependent on `PROJECT_IS_TOP_LEVEL` (a [follow up](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/pull/1263#issuecomment-1516564300) of https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/pull/1263).
3. Makes integration of this project as a subtree easier. A top project can `#include <secp256k1.h>` with no additional `target_include_directories()` commands. For example, see https://github.com/hebasto/secp256k1-CMake-example/tree/subtree.
ACKs for top commit:
theuni:
utACK 71f746c057a66d5ae0dfdb5d439bc49592c0d16e.
Tree-SHA512: 8ccdbcc94b26f36e772611ebaab0f2846debd6ad20f9e361be31a8d2128a14273acb692b0631026e12cc6cdef6d445dce0fd3beb4f71af47b46dfcf840a18879
a273d74b2ea1ef115a7e40fe89a64a6c744018c6 cmake: Improve version comparison (Hennadii Stepanov)
6a58b483efb96de32134611963c16f6bf7e94d51 cmake: Use `if(... IN_LIST ...)` command (Hennadii Stepanov)
2445808c0203215e7182355762944ab909d423d2 cmake: Use dedicated `GENERATOR_IS_MULTI_CONFIG` property (Hennadii Stepanov)
9f8703ef17db0144b320714cd56c1fe0317a5786 cmake: Use dedicated `CMAKE_HOST_APPLE` variable (Hennadii Stepanov)
8c2017035a9c0722aeb7f24162d57d795443fd4c cmake: Use recommended `add_compile_definitions` command (Hennadii Stepanov)
04d4cc071a7aa92ad5edcf970a6cc2a8f415d36c cmake: Add `DESCRIPTION` and `HOMEPAGE_URL` options to `project` command (Hennadii Stepanov)
8a8b6536ef52fbbd9690f859d2f02d7f4b3789f6 cmake: Use `SameMinorVersion` compatibility mode (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR:
- resolves two items from #1235, including a bugfix with package version compatibility
- includes other improvements which have become available for CMake 3.13+.
To test the `GENERATOR_IS_MULTI_CONFIG` property on Linux, one can use the "[Ninja Multi-Config](https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/generator/Ninja%20Multi-Config.html)" generator:
```sh
cmake -S . -B build -G "Ninja Multi-Config"
```
ACKs for top commit:
real-or-random:
ACK a273d74b2ea1ef115a7e40fe89a64a6c744018c6
theuni:
ACK a273d74b2ea1ef115a7e40fe89a64a6c744018c6
Tree-SHA512: f31c4f0f30bf368303e70ab8952cde5cc8c70a5e79a04f879abcbee3d0a8d8c598379fb38f5142cb1f8ff5f9dcfc8b8eb4c13c975a1d05fdcc92d9c805a59d9a
69e1ec033120497b83dd95d92166fa05c54b8a06 Get rid of secp256k1_fe_const_b (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Replaces #1282.
Its only remaining use is in a test introduced in #1118, and it is easily replaced by the new `secp256k1_fe_add_int` from #1217.
ACKs for top commit:
real-or-random:
utACK 69e1ec033120497b83dd95d92166fa05c54b8a06
Tree-SHA512: 6ada192e0643fc5326198b60f019a5081444f9ba0a5b8ba6236f2a526829d8e5e479556600a604d9bc96c7ba86e3aab813f93c66679287d2135e95a2b75f5d3e
8e142ca4102ade1b90dcb06d6c78405ef3220599 Move `SECP256K1_INLINE` macro definition out from `include/secp256k1.h` (Hennadii Stepanov)
77445898a5852ecd38ab95cfb329333a82673115 Remove `SECP256K1_INLINE` usage from examples (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
From [IRC](https://gnusha.org/secp256k1/2023-01-31.log):
> 06:29 \< hebasto\> What are reasons to define the `SECP256K1_INLINE` macro in user's `include/secp256k1.h` header, while it is used internally only?
> 06:32 \< hebasto\> I mean, any other (or a new dedicated) header in `src` looks more appropriate, no?
> 06:35 \< sipa\> I think it may just predate any "utility" internal headers.
> 06:42 \< sipa\> I think it makes sense to move it to util.h
Pros:
- it is a step in direction to better organized headers (in context of #924, #1039)
Cons:
- code duplication for `SECP256K1_GNUC_PREREQ` macro
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 8e142ca4102ade1b90dcb06d6c78405ef3220599
real-or-random:
utACK 8e142ca410
Tree-SHA512: 180e0ba7c2ef242b765f20698b67d06c492b7b70866c21db27c18d8b2e85c3e11f86c6cb99ffa88bbd23891ce3ee8a24bc528f2c91167ec2fddc167463f78eac
ef49a11d29601e09e94134975c968e92c0214102 build: allow static or shared but not both (Cory Fields)
36b0adf1b90139a41fdcb94390d0bb06e9224795 build: remove warning until it's reproducible (Cory Fields)
Pull request description:
Continuing from here: https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/issues/1224#issuecomment-1460438227
Unfortunately it wasn't really possible to keep a clean diff here because of the nature of the change. I suggest reviewing the lib creation stuff in its entirety, sorry about that :\
Rather than allowing for shared and static libs to be built at the same time like autotools, this PR switches to the CMake convention of allowing only 1.
A new `BUILD_SHARED_LIBS` option is added to match CMake convention, as well as a `SECP256K1_DISABLE_SHARED` option which overrides it. That way even projects which have `BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=1` can opt-into a static libsecp in particular.
Details:
Two object libraries are created: `secp256k1_asm` and `secp256k1_precomputed_objs`. Some tests/benchmarks use the object libraries directly, some link against the real lib: `secp256k1`.
Because the objs don't know what they're going to be linked into, they need to be told how to deal with PIC.
The `DEFINE_SYMBOL` property sets the `DLL_EXPORT` define as necessary (when building a shared lib)
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK ef49a11d29601e09e94134975c968e92c0214102, only [suggested](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/pull/1230#pullrequestreview-1388191165) changes since my recent [review](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/pull/1230#pullrequestreview-1352125381).
real-or-random:
ACK ef49a11d29601e09e94134975c968e92c0214102
Tree-SHA512: 8870de305176fdb677caff0fdfc6f8c59c0e906489cb72bc9980e551002812685e59e20d731f2a82e33628bdfbb7261eafd6f228038cad3ec83bd74335959600
a575339c0282ba49a4f46c9c660a4cc3b6bfc703 Remove bits argument from secp256k1_wnaf_const (always 256) (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
There is little reason for having the number of bits in the scalar as a parameter, as I don't think there are any (current) use cases for non-256-bit scalars.
ACKs for top commit:
jonasnick:
ACK a575339c0282ba49a4f46c9c660a4cc3b6bfc703
real-or-random:
utACK a575339c0282ba49a4f46c9c660a4cc3b6bfc703
Tree-SHA512: 994b1f19b4c513f6d070ed259a5d6f221a0c2450271ec824c5eba1cd0ecace276de391c170285bfeae96aaf8f1e0f7fe6260966ded0336c75c522ab6c56d182c
e5de45460953c8ae16521b1928ac14de218998a3 tests: Add Wycheproof ECDSA vectors (RandomLattice)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a test using the Wycheproof vectors as outlined in #1106. We add all 463 ECDSA test vectors. These vectors cover:
- edge cases in arithmetic operations
- signatures with special values for (r,s) that should be rejected
- special cases of public keys
The vectors are pulled from the Wycheproof project using a python script to emit C code.
All the new ECDSA Wycheproof vectors pass.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
ACK e5de45460953c8ae16521b1928ac14de218998a3
real-or-random:
ACK e5de45460953c8ae16521b1928ac14de218998a3
Tree-SHA512: e9684f14ff3f5225a4a4949b490e07527d559c28aa61ed03c03bc52ea64785f0b80b9e1b1628665eacf24006526271ea0fb108629c9c3c1d758e52d214a056f1
Adds a test using the Wycheproof vectors as outlined in #1106. The
vectors are taken from the Wycheproof repo. We use a python script
to convert the JSON-formatted vectors into C code.
Co-authored-by: Sean Andersen <6730974+andozw@users.noreply.github.com>
