This simplifies building without a build system.
This is in line with #925; the paths fixed here were either forgotten
there or only introduced later. This commit also makes the Makefile
stricter so that further "wrong" #include paths will lead to build
errors even in autotools builds.
This belongs to #929.
Co-authored-by: Hennadii Stepanov <32963518+hebasto@users.noreply.github.com>
This is a backwards-compatible API change: Before this commit, a context
initialized for signing was required to call functions that rely on
ecmult_gen. After this commit, this is no longer necessary because the
static ecmult_gen table is always present. In practice this means that
the corresponding functions will just work instead of calling the
illegal callback when given a context which is not (officially)
initialized for signing.
This is in line with 6815761, which made the analogous change with
respect to ecmult and contexts initialized for signing. But as opposed
to 681571, which removed the ecmult context entirely, we cannot remove
the ecmult_gen context entirely because it is still used for random
blinding. Moreover, since the secp256k1_context_no_precomp context is
const and cannot meaningfully support random blinding, we refrain (for
now) from changing its API, i.e., the illegal callback will still be
called when trying to use ecmult_gen operations with the static
secp256k1_context_no_precomp context.
adec5a16383f1704d80d7c767b2a65d9221cee08 Add missing null check for ctx and input keys in the public API (Elichai Turkel)
f4edfc758142d6e100ca5d086126bf532b8a7020 Improve consistency for NULL arguments in the public interface (Elichai Turkel)
Pull request description:
I went over the public API and added missing explanations on when a pointer can be null and when it cannot,
and added some missing checks for null ctx and null pubkey pointers.
Open questions IMHO:
1. Can `secp256k1_context_create` return NULL? right now it could return null if you replaced the callbacks at compile time to ones that do return(unlike the default ones which never return).
2. Related to the first, should we document that the callbacks should never return? (in the tests we use returning callbacks but we can violate our own API) right now we say the following:
> After this callback returns, anything may happen, including crashing.
Is this enough to document answer `no` for the first question and just saying that if the callback returned then you violated the API so `secp256k1_context_create` can return NULL even though it is promised not to?
Right now we AFAICT we never check if it returns null
Another nit I'm not sure about is wording `(does nothing if NULL)`/`(ignored if NULL)`/`(can be NULL)`
More missing docs:
1. Documenting the `data` argument to the default nonce functions
ACKs for top commit:
ariard:
ACK adec5a16
jonasnick:
ACK adec5a16383f1704d80d7c767b2a65d9221cee08
Tree-SHA512: 6fe785776b7e451e9e8cae944987f927b1eb2e2d404dfcb1b0ceb0a30bda4ce16469708920269417e5ada09739723a430e270dea1868fe7d12ccd5699dde5976
This enables testing overflow is correctly encoded in the recid, and
likely triggers more edge cases.
Also introduce a Sage script to generate the parameters.
Most of the codebase correctly used short-cutting to avoid calling
_is_zero on possibly incompletely initialized elements, but a few
places were missed.
Identifiers starting with an underscore and followed immediately by a capital letter are reserved by the C++ standard.
The only header guards not fixed are those in the headers auto-generated from java.
Make sure we clear the nonce data even if the nonce function fails (it may have written partial data), and call memset only once in the case we iterate to produce a valid signature.
There are now 2 encoding formats supported: 64-byte "compact" and DER.
The latter is strict: the data has to be exact DER, though the values
inside don't need to be valid.
Libtool will do the right thing and use whatever is available
based on --enable-shared/--enable-static.
This also means that some of the things we build actually
test the dynamic library.
