Even though `secp256k1_musig_nonce_gen_internal` can currently only fail
if the API is misused (invalid `keypair` or `keyagg_cache` parameters),
clear out the buffer holding secret key data as well in this case to
follow best practices.
The issue was found and reported by l0rinc using GPT 5.5 (Thanks!).
4359f050cc surjection: Remove test that reads out of bounds (Tim Ruffing)
78999f3a9a surjection: Fix leading whitespace (Tim Ruffing)
229e1f127a surjection: Fix read of uninitialized value in tests (Tim Ruffing)
c0a26a9c1b ci: enable surjectionproof module in CI configs (copilot-swe-agent[bot])
Pull request description:
The CI workflow enabled the ZKP experimental module set but omitted surjectionproof, so that module was never exercised in those jobs. This change wires surjectionproof into the same CI paths as the other enabled ZKP modules.
- **CI module plumbing (`ci/ci.sh`)**
- Added `SURJECTIONPROOF` to the exported/printed CI env set.
- Passed `SURJECTIONPROOF` into configure via `--enable-module-surjectionproof`.
- **Workflow env defaults and matrices (`.github/workflows/ci.yml`)**
- Added a global default: `SURJECTIONPROOF: 'no'`.
- Added `SURJECTIONPROOF: 'yes'` in every job/matrix env block that already enables the ZKP module group (`RANGEPROOF`, `WHITELIST`, `GENERATOR`, etc.).
- **Representative wiring change**
```sh
--enable-module-rangeproof="$RANGEPROOF" \
--enable-module-surjectionproof="$SURJECTIONPROOF" \
--enable-module-whitelist="$WHITELIST"
```
<!-- START COPILOT ORIGINAL PROMPT -->
<details>
<summary>Original prompt</summary>
>
> ----
>
> *This section details on the original issue you should resolve*
>
> <issue_title>ci: surjectionproof module is never enabled</issue_title>
> <issue_description>There's not even a SURJECTIONPROOF env variable in the GitHub Actions workflow... This should be enabled everywhere where the other ZKP modules are enabled.
>
> It may be better to enable all modules by default, but that's a change that could potentially benefit even upstream, so maybe let's first just fix this by enabling surjectionproof.</issue_description>
>
> <agent_instructions>Only add enabling of the surjectionproof module (no enabling of all modules by default)</agent_instructions>
>
> ## Comments on the Issue (you are @copilot in this section)
>
> <comments>
> </comments>
>
</details>
<!-- START COPILOT CODING AGENT SUFFIX -->
- FixesBlockstreamResearch/secp256k1-zkp#334
ACKs for top commit:
mllwchrry:
ACK 4359f05
Tree-SHA512: 13d776a76f73db6e74ca253099583da3d2600f424ea1f6bcbc9cd12544721477225a4190ffd34f4f1a77ab3b1d1e21d1f6d83409aa969bafe66a7978bef1b2d2
4d92a083bc sha256: speed up writes using multi-block compression (furszy)
0753f8b909 Add API to override SHA256 compression at runtime (furszy)
fdb6a91a5e Introduce hash context to support pluggable SHA256 compression (furszy)
Pull request description:
Tackling the long-standing request #702.
Right now we ship our own SHA256 implementation, a standard baseline version that does not take advantage of any hardware-optimized instruction, and it cannot be accessed by the embedding application - it is for internal usage only.
This means embedding applications often have to implement or include a different version for their use cases, wasting space on constrained environments, and in performance-sensitive setups it forces them to use a slower path than what the platform provides. Many projects already rely on tuned SHA-NI / ARMv8 / or other hardware-optimized code, so always using the baseline implementation we ship within the library is not ideal.
These changes allow users to supply their own SHA256 compression function at runtime, while preserving the existing default behavior for everyone else. This is primarily intended for environments where the available SHA256 implementation is detected dynamically and recompiling the library with a different implementation is not feasible (equivalent build-time functionality will come in a follow-up PR).
It introduces a new API:
```C89
secp256k1_context_set_sha256_transform_callback(ctx, fn_transform)
```
This function installs the optimized SHA256 compression into the `secp256k1_context`, which is then used by all internal computations. Important: The provided function is verified to be output-equivalent to the original one.
As a quick example, using this functionality in Bitcoin-Core will be very straightforward: f68bef06d9
ACKs for top commit:
real-or-random:
ACK 4d92a083bc
w0xlt:
ACK 4d92a083bc
theStack:
ACK 4d92a083bc
Tree-SHA512: 058e2e82071f1ca77254b684458292c621e60d65bbcc5500574429717e7db75bc9f3221129fafd11eb5d33e666a5efec5e9844460d3b194ef3b6b16f2df28fb9
921b9711ea util: introduce and use `ARRAY_SIZE` macro (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR is another tiny improvement found while working on #1765, with the goal to avoid code repetition.
The `ARRAY_SIZE` macro definition is pretty wide-spread in C projects and e.g. matches the one [used in the Linux Kernel](9702969978/include/linux/array_size.h (L11)) (without the additional check to reject pointers, as we would need GNU C for that, see e.g. https://stackoverflow.com/a/19455169; not sure if a useful counterpart exists that only relies on C89). Replacement instances were identified via `$ git grep sizeof.*/.*sizeof`.
ACKs for top commit:
w0xlt:
ACK 921b9711ea
real-or-random:
utACK 921b9711ea
Tree-SHA512: 44b6bf0132cf00fade526a3fc04e03dc896d04874123614c032206b61f97c81f94d139b6cc0c108eceaa699251580c19420d230b3150607303ca2cb7ab9a0bcb
This introduces `secp256k1_context_set_sha256_compression()`,
which allows users to provide their own SHA256 block-compression
function at runtime.
This is useful in setups where the fastest implementation can only
be determined dynamically based on the available CPU features, and
rebuilding the library is not possible.
The callback is installed on the `secp256k1_context` and is then used
by all operations that compute SHA256 hashes. As part of the setup,
the library performs sanity checks to ensure that the supplied
function is equivalent to the default transform.
Passing NULL to the callback setter restores the built-in
implementation.
This is purely a mechanical change with no behavior change.
It introduces a secp256k1_hash_ctx struct inside secp256k1_context
and propagates it to all SHA256-related operations.
This sets up the ability to provide a hardware-optimized SHA256
compression function at runtime in a follow-up commit.
f48b1bfa5d hash: add midstate initializer and use it for tagged hashes (w0xlt)
Pull request description:
Each tagged hash midstate function (e.g., `secp256k1_schnorrsig_sha256_tagged`) calls `secp256k1_sha256_initialize` before immediately overwriting every field it sets: `s[0]` through `s[7]` and `bytes`. The `buf[64]` member does not need initialization either, because `bytes` is set to 64, which means the buffer position (`bytes & 0x3F`) (`= bytes % 64`) is 0, so buf is always written before being read.
Remove the 11 redundant `secp256k1_sha256_initialize` calls across the `schnorrsig`, `ellswift`, and `musig` modules.
ACKs for top commit:
real-or-random:
utACK f48b1bfa5d
theStack:
Code-review ACK f48b1bfa5d
Tree-SHA512: 769beb96f3921cc3c180ed0d17484ffa0dc78041c889a8e56603679d8eaca5fe13e63759ada78f83d8e0ff7aae392e6bcbc1a9fe8b959105ea4a3d8ef51abf15
Introduce secp256k1_sha256_initialize_midstate() in the hash layer and use it at all tagged-hash midstate call sites across schnorrsig, musig, and ellswift.
Document the byte-counter contract at the declaration site in hash.h and add run_sha256_initialize_midstate_tests() to directly verify helper behavior against initialize_tagged.
Also switch the helper to take const uint32_t state[8] to reduce argument-order risk at call sites.
The secp256k1_ellswift_xdh function uses overflow = secp256k1_scalar_is_zero(&s) which overwrites the overflow flag from the preceding secp256k1_scalar_set_b32 call. This means secret keys >= the curve order are silently accepted (reduced mod n) instead of being rejected.
The fix changes = to |=, matching the correct pattern already used in secp256k1_ecdh (main_impl.h, line 51).
The ECDH module's test suite explicitly tests overflow rejection (passes secp256k1_group_order_bytes as a key and checks the function returns 0). The ellswift test suite has no corresponding test, which is why this went undetected.
