refactor: rename check_fe_equal -> fe_equal
As this function doesn't do any checking, it's better to rename it, so that it's less likely to miss the needed `CHECK`.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -188,9 +188,9 @@ void run_ellswift_tests(void) {
|
||||
CHECK(ret == ((testcase->enc_bitmap >> c) & 1));
|
||||
if (ret) {
|
||||
secp256k1_fe x2;
|
||||
CHECK(check_fe_equal(&t, &testcase->encs[c]));
|
||||
CHECK(fe_equal(&t, &testcase->encs[c]));
|
||||
secp256k1_ellswift_xswiftec_var(&x2, &testcase->u, &testcase->encs[c]);
|
||||
CHECK(check_fe_equal(&testcase->x, &x2));
|
||||
CHECK(fe_equal(&testcase->x, &x2));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ void run_ellswift_tests(void) {
|
||||
CHECK(ret);
|
||||
ret = secp256k1_pubkey_load(CTX, &ge, &pubkey);
|
||||
CHECK(ret);
|
||||
CHECK(check_fe_equal(&testcase->x, &ge.x));
|
||||
CHECK(fe_equal(&testcase->x, &ge.x));
|
||||
CHECK(secp256k1_fe_is_odd(&ge.y) == testcase->odd_y);
|
||||
}
|
||||
for (i = 0; (unsigned)i < sizeof(ellswift_xdh_tests_bip324) / sizeof(ellswift_xdh_tests_bip324[0]); ++i) {
|
||||
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ void run_ellswift_tests(void) {
|
||||
secp256k1_ecmult(&resj, &decj, &sec, NULL);
|
||||
secp256k1_ge_set_gej(&res, &resj);
|
||||
/* Compare. */
|
||||
CHECK(check_fe_equal(&res.x, &share_x));
|
||||
CHECK(fe_equal(&res.x, &share_x));
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* Verify the joint behavior of secp256k1_ellswift_xdh */
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < 200 * COUNT; i++) {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user