1c15cb2f9169bb08a4128c183eeeca80fff97ab7 ref(example_cli): Add new struct Init (vmammal)
89a7ddca7f6ed8c65ed0124774f3a868d08faf68 ref(esplora): `Box` a large `esplora_client::Error` (vmammal)
097d818d4c7fff12d72ce0ef10ceb9b575c154e1 ref(wallet): `Wallet::preselect_utxos` now accepts a `&TxParams` (vmammal)
f11d663b7efb98dd72fed903ade8c5e7af0b5a3a ref(psbt): refactor body of `get_utxo_for` to address `clippy::manual_map` (vmammal)
4679ca1df7209d2b356fbb8cbd675f07756d1301 ref(example_cli): add typedefs to reduce type complexity (vmammal)
64a90192d9d49c3df22d2b5f489ba20222fd941a refactor: remove old clippy allow attributes (vmammal)
Pull request description:
closes#1127
There are several instances in the code where we allow clippy lints that would otherwise be flagged during regular checks. It would be preferable to minimize the number of "clippy allow" attributes either by fixing the affected areas or setting a specific configuration in `clippy.toml`. In cases where we have to allow a particular lint, it should be documented why the lint doesn't apply.
For context see https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk/issues/1127#issuecomment-1784256647 as well as the commit message details.
One area I'm unsure of is whether `Box`ing a large error in 4fc2216 is the right approach. Logically it makes sense to avoid allocating a needlessly heavy `Result`, but I haven't studied the implications or tradeoffs of such a change.
### Checklists
#### All Submissions:
* [x] I've signed all my commits
* [x] I followed the [contribution guidelines](https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
* [x] I ran `cargo fmt` and `cargo clippy` before committing
ACKs for top commit:
evanlinjin:
ACK 1c15cb2f9169bb08a4128c183eeeca80fff97ab7
Tree-SHA512: 5fa3796a33678651414e7aad7ef8309b4cbe2a9ab00dce094964b40784edb2f46a44067785d95ea26f4cd88d593420485be94c9b09ac589f632453fbd8c94d85
c6b9ed3b76