Although somewhat convenient to have, coupling the Wallet with
the blockchain trait causes development friction and complexity.
What if sometimes the wallet is "offline" (no access to the blockchain)
but sometimes its online?
The only thing the Wallet needs the blockchain for is to sync.
But not all applications will even use the sync method and the sync
method doesn't require the full blockchain functionality.
So we instead pass the blockchain in when we want to sync.
- To further reduce the coupling with blockchain I removed the get_height call from `new` and just use the height of the
last sync in the database.
- I split up the blockchain trait a bit into subtraits.
We used to consider a tx input as ours if we had the
tx that creates it in the database.
This commit actually checks if an input is ours before adding
its value to the `sent` field.
7f8103dd762572f8b0f01514d0c32723d27c61e9 Fix typos in comments (thunderbiscuit)
Pull request description:
### Description
This PR fixes a bunch of small typos in comments. I'm getting acquainted with the codebase and found a few typos just by chance, and ended up going through it with an IDE searching for typos in all files.
### Notes to the reviewers
To be clear, this PR _only addresses typos that are within comments_.
### Checklists
* [x] I've signed all my commits
* [x] I followed the [contribution guidelines](https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
* [x] I ran `cargo fmt` and `cargo clippy` before committing
ACKs for top commit:
notmandatory:
ACK 7f8103dd762572f8b0f01514d0c32723d27c61e9
Tree-SHA512: eb3f8f21cbd05de06292affd9ef69c21b52022dfdf25c562c8f4d9c9c011f18175dff0c650cb7efcfb2b665f2af80d9a153be3d12327c47796b0d00bfd5d9803
2fc81141806ace8f12e5a019c0866f16fa8a02dc moving the function wallet_name_from_descriptor from blockchain/rpc.rs to wallet/mod.rs as it can be useful not only for rpc (Richard Ulrich)
Pull request description:
### Description
Moving the function wallet_name_from_descriptor from rpc.rs to mod.rs
Since the local cache for compact filters should be separate per wallet, this function can be useful not only for rpc.
### Notes to the reviewers
I thought about renaming it, but waited for opinions on that.
### Checklists
#### All Submissions:
* [x] I've signed all my commits
* [x] I followed the [contribution guidelines](https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
* [x] I ran `cargo fmt` and `cargo clippy` before committing
ACKs for top commit:
notmandatory:
re-ACK 2fc8114
Tree-SHA512: d5732e74f7a54f54dde39fff77f94f12c611a419bed9683025ecf7be95cde330209f676dfc9346ebcd29194325589710eafdd1d533e8073d0662cb397577119f
Now works with latest released versions of rust-bitcoincore-rpc and
bitcoind. Once these crates are updated to support creating descriptor
wallets and add importdescriptors and bech32m support this test will
need to be updated.
Currently we have duplicate code for converting the fee estimate we get
back from esplora into a fee rate. This logic can be moved to a separate
function and live in the `esplora` module.
The `Blockchain` implementation for connecting to an Esplora instance is
currently based on `reqwest`. Some users may not wish to use reqwest.
`ureq` is a simple HTTP client (no async) that is useful when `reqwest`
is not suitable.
- Move `esplora.rs` -> `esplora/reqwest.rs`
- Add an implementation based on the `reqwest` esplora code but using `ureq`
- Add feature flags and conditional includes to re-export everything to
the `esplora` module so we don't effect the rest of the code base.
- Remove the forced dependency on `tokio`.
- Make esplora independent of async-interface
- Depend on local version of macros crate
