e85aa247cb85601e96f4d82b7a996f709559223f Avoid using immature coinbase inputs (Daniela Brozzoni)
0e0d5a0e957fbf602023011d9114d8bcb8effb67 populate_test_db accepts a `coinbase` param (Daniela Brozzoni)
Pull request description:
### Description
With this PR we start considering how many confirmations a coinbase has. If it's not mature yet, we don't use it for building transactions.
Fixes#413
### Notes to the reviewers
This PR is based on #611, review that one before reviewing this 😄
007c5a78335a3e9f6c9c28a077793c2ba34bbb4e adds a coinbase parameter to `populate_test_db`, to specify if you want the db to be populated with immature coins. This is useful for `test_spend_coinbase`, but that's probably going to be the only use case.
I don't think it's a big deal to have a test function take an almost_always_useless parameter - it's not an exposed API, anyways. But, if you can come up with a different way of implementing `test_spend_coinbase` that doesn't require 007c5a78335a3e9f6c9c28a077793c2ba34bbb4e, even better! I looked for it for a while, but other than duplicating the whole `populate_test_db` code, which made the test way harder to comprehend, I didn't find any other way.
### Checklists
#### All Submissions:
* [x] I've signed all my commits
* [x] I followed the [contribution guidelines](https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
* [x] I ran `cargo fmt` and `cargo clippy` before committing
#### Bugfixes:
* [ ] This pull request breaks the existing API
* [x] I've added tests to reproduce the issue which are now passing
* [x] I'm linking the issue being fixed by this PR
ACKs for top commit:
afilini:
ACK e85aa24
Tree-SHA512: 30f470c33f9ffe928500a58f821f8ce445c653766459465eb005031ac523c6f143856fc9ca68a8e1f23a485c6543a9565bd889f9557c92bf5322e81291212a5f
6a150368674046f796f5c37755896f16d8345fbc Restrict `drain_to` usage (Daniela Brozzoni)
Pull request description:
### Description
Before this commit, you could create a transaction with `drain_to` set
without specifying recipients, nor `drain_wallet`, nor `utxos`. What would
happen is that BDK would pick one input from the wallet and send
that one to `drain_to`, which is quite weird.
This PR restricts the usage of `drain_to`: if you want to use it as a
change output, you need to set recipients as well. If you want to send
a specific utxo to the `drain_to` address, you specify it through
`add_utxos`. If you want to drain the whole wallet, you set
`drain_wallet`. In any other case, if `drain_to` is set, we return a
`NoRecipients` error.
Fixes#620
### Checklists
#### All Submissions:
* [x] I've signed all my commits
* [x] I followed the [contribution guidelines](https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
* [x] I ran `cargo fmt` and `cargo clippy` before committing
#### Bugfixes:
* [x] This pull request breaks the existing API - kinda?
* [x] I've added tests to reproduce the issue which are now passing
* [x] I'm linking the issue being fixed by this PR
ACKs for top commit:
afilini:
ACK 6a150368674046f796f5c37755896f16d8345fbc
Tree-SHA512: 69076977df37fcaac92dd99d2f2c9c37098971817d5b0629fc7e3069390eb5789331199b3b7c5d0569d70473f4f37e683a5a0b30e2c6b4e2ec22a5ef1d0f2d77
By default bdk sets the transaction's nLockTime to current_height
to discourage fee sniping.
current_height can be provided by the user through TxParams; if the user
didn't provide it, we use the last sync height, or 0 if we never synced.
Fixes#533
Before this commit, you could create a transaction with `drain_to` set
without specifying recipients, nor `drain_wallet`, nor `utxos`. What would
happen is that BDK would pick one input from the wallet and send
that one to `drain_to`, which is quite weird.
This PR restricts the usage of `drain_to`: if you want to use it as a
change output, you need to set recipients as well. If you want to send
a specific utxo to the `drain_to` address, you specify it through
`add_utxos`. If you want to drain the whole wallet, you set
`drain_wallet`. In any other case, if `drain_to` is set, we return a
`NoRecipients` error.
Fixes#620
A `is_spent` field is added to LocalUtxo; when a txo is spent we set
this field to true instead of deleting the entire utxo from the
database.
This allows us to create txs double-spending txs already in blockchain.
Listunspent won't return spent utxos, effectively excluding them from the
coin selection and balance calculation
Although somewhat convenient to have, coupling the Wallet with
the blockchain trait causes development friction and complexity.
What if sometimes the wallet is "offline" (no access to the blockchain)
but sometimes its online?
The only thing the Wallet needs the blockchain for is to sync.
But not all applications will even use the sync method and the sync
method doesn't require the full blockchain functionality.
So we instead pass the blockchain in when we want to sync.
- To further reduce the coupling with blockchain I removed the get_height call from `new` and just use the height of the
last sync in the database.
- I split up the blockchain trait a bit into subtraits.
What set_single_recipient does turns out to be useful with multiple
recipients.
Effectively, set_single_recipient was simply creating a change
output that was arbitrarily required to be the only output.
But what if you want to send excess funds to one address but still have
additional recipients who receive a fixed value?
Generalizing this to `drain_to` simplifies the logic and removes several
error cases while also allowing new use cases.
"maintain_single_recipient" is also replaced with "allow_shrinking"
which has more general semantics.
What set_single_recipient does turns out to be useful with multiple
recipients.
Effectively, set_single_recipient was simply creating a change
output that was arbitrarily required to be the only output.
But what if you want to send excess funds to one address but still have
additional recipients who receive a fixed value?
Generalizing this to `drain_to` simplifies the logic and removes several
error cases while also allowing new use cases.
"maintain_single_recipient" is also replaced with "allow_shrinking"
which has more general semantics.
Idiomatic Rust uses lowercase for acronyms for all characters after the
first e.g. `std::net::TcpStream`. PSBT (Partially Signed Bitcoin
Transaction) should be rendered `Psbt` in Rust code if we want to write
idiomatic Rust.
Use `Psbt` instead of `PSBT` when aliasing the import of
`PartiallySignedTransaction` from `bitcoin` library.
Instead of providing an opt-in option to force the addition of the
`non_witness_utxo`, we will now add them by default and provide the
option to disable them when they aren't considered necessary.
To allow adding UTXOs external to the current wallet.
The caller must provide the psbt::Input so we can create a coherent PSBT
at the end and so this is compatible with existing PSBT workflows.
Main changes:
- There are now two types of UTXOs, local and foreign reflected in a
`Utxo` enum.
- `WeightedUtxo` now captures floating `(Utxo, usize)` tuples
- `CoinSelectionResult` now has methods on it for distinguishing between
local amount included vs total.
Clippy emits warning:
warning: avoid using `collect()` when not needed
As suggested by clippy just use `count` directly on the iterator instead
of `collect` followed by `len`.
Due to brain malfunction I made utxos into a BTree. This made a test
pass but is incorrect. The test itself was incorrect as per comment in
https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk/pull/258#issuecomment-758370380
So I (1) reverted utxos back to a Vec, (2) fixed the test and expanded
the comment in the test.
Fixes#251
TxBuilders are now not created directly but are created through the
wallet with `build_tx` and `build_fee_bump`.
The advantages of this realised in this commit are:
1. Normal tx creation and fee bumping use the code internally. The only
difference between normal tx and fee bump is how the builder is created.
2. The TxBuilder now has a refernce to the wallet and can therefore
lookup things as methods are called on it. `add_utxo` now uses this to
look up UTXO deta when it is called (rather than having to do it and
possibly error later on).
To support these changes `get_utxo` and `get_descriptor_for_keychain`
public methods have been added to Wallet. I could have kept them
pub(crate) but they seem like fine APIs to have publicly.
This commit also fixes the timelock comparing logic in the policy module, since
the rules are different for absolute (OP_CLTV) and relative (OP_CSV) timelocks.
Fixes#215
