364ad95e85bd09a01cb4cbf3ceb9e9fcc074c8b4 Fix hierarchy of headers on docs landing page (thunderbiscuit)
Pull request description:
### Description
This PR fixes the hierarchy of headers on the lib.rs docs. I noticed it as I was reading through the docs. The new hierarchy is the following:
- About (h1)
- A tour of BDK (h1)
- Examples (h1)
- Sync the balance of a descriptor (h2)
- Generate a few addresses (h2)
- Create a transaction (h2)
- Sign a transaction (h2)
- Feature flags (h1)
- Internal features (h1)
### Checklists
#### All Submissions:
* [x] I've signed all my commits
* [x] I followed the [contribution guidelines](https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
* [x] I ran `cargo fmt` and `cargo clippy` before committing
ACKs for top commit:
rajarshimaitra:
tACK 364ad95e85
Tree-SHA512: b4439a200c320a1815c572ac36b81c4d684209cb5cf1b90d3f761893ad672a270722be7d7b61d77434a7f98c4276d6fc9694d0c86cacf03c72dc35ca17b5e7d3
1803f5ea8a7a2f8f9ebdfa520baad91f84bd6ba0 Update `electrsd` to v0.15 (Alekos Filini)
Pull request description:
<!-- You can erase any parts of this template not applicable to your Pull Request. -->
### Description
PR RCasatta/electrsd#33 has been merged and the new changes released as part of `v0.15.0`: the PR allows setting an env variable (`ELECTRSD_EXE`) to use a custom electrsd binary, which can be useful when the one that is downloaded automatically doesn't work for whatever reason.
### Checklists
#### All Submissions:
* [x] I've signed all my commits
* [x] I followed the [contribution guidelines](https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
* [x] I ran `cargo fmt` and `cargo clippy` before committing
#### New Features:
* [ ] I've added tests for the new feature
* [ ] I've added docs for the new feature
* [ ] I've updated `CHANGELOG.md`
#### Bugfixes:
* [ ] This pull request breaks the existing API
* [ ] I've added tests to reproduce the issue which are now passing
* [ ] I'm linking the issue being fixed by this PR
ACKs for top commit:
LLFourn:
ACK 1803f5e
notmandatory:
ACK 1803f5ea8a7a2f8f9ebdfa520baad91f84bd6ba0
Tree-SHA512: 01d84763a5acf3aa1686b91ba7cb0c7ec3a0ca6c7b9bac29aa74a72f54ed31c476b7a8b0f8c6c8a8ccf530ad8a19e90e144ac4cacbe436699ef9e319b5732f1c
A `is_spent` field is added to LocalUtxo; when a txo is spent we set
this field to true instead of deleting the entire utxo from the
database.
This allows us to create txs double-spending txs already in blockchain.
Listunspent won't return spent utxos, effectively excluding them from the
coin selection and balance calculation
022256c91ac7a4d9324a1a7925394a948feec808 Fix comment on peek_address (Lloyd Fournier)
00f0901bac805360695d0c492df8fa809918863e Add API for internal addresses (LLFourn)
Pull request description:
There are good reasons for applications to need to get internal
addresses too. For example creating a transactions that splits an output
into several smaller ones.
### Checklists
#### All Submissions:
* [x] I've signed all my commits
* [x] I followed the [contribution guidelines](https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
* [x] I ran `cargo fmt` and `cargo clippy` before committing
#### New Features:
* [x] I've added tests for the new feature
* [x] I've added docs for the new feature
* [x] I've updated `CHANGELOG.md`
ACKs for top commit:
notmandatory:
ACK 022256c91ac7a4d9324a1a7925394a948feec808
Tree-SHA512: 0ead6669c9974332708ae6cba1a5be69cd4b3b6c7a21896efdce178d4406265ba072e1cf02d1913178d0a551f3b276d99b75676c632833964f87484e262a61b1
For some reason while doing the "remove blockchain from wallet PR" I
changed the tests around in what I thought was a benign way. But it
meant (apparently) that both parties "test_sync_double_receive" were
using the same "blockchain". This meant that when the blockchain was RPC
they both imported their addresses to it and got each other's results
when syncing. This bugged out the sync and this commit fixes that.
Although somewhat convenient to have, coupling the Wallet with
the blockchain trait causes development friction and complexity.
What if sometimes the wallet is "offline" (no access to the blockchain)
but sometimes its online?
The only thing the Wallet needs the blockchain for is to sync.
But not all applications will even use the sync method and the sync
method doesn't require the full blockchain functionality.
So we instead pass the blockchain in when we want to sync.
- To further reduce the coupling with blockchain I removed the get_height call from `new` and just use the height of the
last sync in the database.
- I split up the blockchain trait a bit into subtraits.
There are good reasons for applications to need to get internal
addresses too. For example creating a transactions that splits an output
into several smaller ones.
We used to consider a tx input as ours if we had the
tx that creates it in the database.
This commit actually checks if an input is ours before adding
its value to the `sent` field.
The default sync verification is removed from wallet module.
By default sync time verification only makes sense for `electrum` and
`esplora` backend as they are usually untrusted 3rd party services.
script verification for transaction is costly, so removing default
script verification optimizes performance.
5ac51dfe74c51c83fe270570d7ffc50888cf554f fix and test is_dust (James Taylor)
a0c140bb29ab37103e4a24d296ac6fcea91da69e add doc comment for IsDust trait (James Taylor)
bf5994b14ade1fc0c37d3e3cda6946c26ceea631 fixed fee in test, removed unnecessary comment (James Taylor)
ca682819b396c44c9139086b1537d32b212499a1 using dust value from rust-bitcoin (James Taylor)
Pull request description:
### Description
This PR aims to fix#472 . We can retrieve the dust value for a given ``bitcoin::blockdata::script::Script``, so I adjusted the ``is_dust`` function within the ``IsDust`` trait to receive such a ``&Script``. Thus, the ``is_dust`` function can make the proper comparison.
Let me know if you think that there could be a better interface than this.
Furthermore, because this new ``is_dust`` function provides a tighter upper bound on Bitcoin Core's ``GetDustThreshold()``, it actually invalidated a test. In the test, the drain output for a transaction was no longer considered dust and no longer included in the fee. Instead, the drain output was kicked back to the sender, invalidating the asserts in line 3436, 3437 and 3441 in ``src/wallet/mod.rs``. I increased the ``FeeRate`` in the test just enough that the drain output would be small enough to considered dust again and included in the total fee.
### Checklists
#### All Submissions:
* [x] I've signed all my commits
* [x] I followed the [contribution guidelines](https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md)
* [x] I ran `cargo fmt` and `cargo clippy` before committing
ACKs for top commit:
afilini:
ACK 5ac51dfe74c51c83fe270570d7ffc50888cf554f
notmandatory:
re ACK 5ac51dfe74c51c83fe270570d7ffc50888cf554f
Tree-SHA512: addf38fe065de581ddfcd3b4e6db92cd35d5bfa8cac78bd08c01f7a01292724a203ef59b09f3f5cd8e0fa0bb6d89efe72afda36efc11ded0424fc8105326af3f
