fix(tx_graph)!: Change tx_last_seen to Option<u64>
Also fixup `test_list_owned_txouts` to check that the right outputs, utxos, and balance are returned at different local chain heights. This fixes an issue where unbroadcast and otherwise non-canonical transactions were returned from methods `list_chain_txs` and `Wallet::transactions` because every tx inserted had a last_seen of 0 making it appear unconfirmed. Note this commit changes the way `Balance` is represented due to new logic in `try_get_chain_position` that no longer considers txs with non-canonical anchors. Before this change, a tx anchored to a block that is reorged out had a permanent effect on the pending balance, and now only txs with a last_seen time or an anchor confirmed in the best chain will return a `ChainPosition`.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ use core::{
|
||||
#[derive(Clone, Debug, PartialEq)]
|
||||
pub struct TxGraph<A = ()> {
|
||||
// all transactions that the graph is aware of in format: `(tx_node, tx_anchors, tx_last_seen)`
|
||||
txs: HashMap<Txid, (TxNodeInternal, BTreeSet<A>, u64)>,
|
||||
txs: HashMap<Txid, (TxNodeInternal, BTreeSet<A>, Option<u64>)>,
|
||||
spends: BTreeMap<OutPoint, HashSet<Txid>>,
|
||||
anchors: BTreeSet<(A, Txid)>,
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ pub struct TxNode<'a, T, A> {
|
||||
/// The blocks that the transaction is "anchored" in.
|
||||
pub anchors: &'a BTreeSet<A>,
|
||||
/// The last-seen unix timestamp of the transaction as unconfirmed.
|
||||
pub last_seen_unconfirmed: u64,
|
||||
pub last_seen_unconfirmed: Option<u64>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'a, T, A> Deref for TxNode<'a, T, A> {
|
||||
@@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ impl<A: Clone + Ord> TxGraph<A> {
|
||||
(
|
||||
TxNodeInternal::Partial([(outpoint.vout, txout)].into()),
|
||||
BTreeSet::new(),
|
||||
0,
|
||||
None,
|
||||
),
|
||||
);
|
||||
self.apply_update(update)
|
||||
@@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ impl<A: Clone + Ord> TxGraph<A> {
|
||||
let mut update = Self::default();
|
||||
update.txs.insert(
|
||||
tx.compute_txid(),
|
||||
(TxNodeInternal::Whole(tx), BTreeSet::new(), 0),
|
||||
(TxNodeInternal::Whole(tx), BTreeSet::new(), None),
|
||||
);
|
||||
self.apply_update(update)
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ impl<A: Clone + Ord> TxGraph<A> {
|
||||
pub fn insert_seen_at(&mut self, txid: Txid, seen_at: u64) -> ChangeSet<A> {
|
||||
let mut update = Self::default();
|
||||
let (_, _, update_last_seen) = update.txs.entry(txid).or_default();
|
||||
*update_last_seen = seen_at;
|
||||
*update_last_seen = Some(seen_at);
|
||||
self.apply_update(update)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -669,7 +669,7 @@ impl<A: Clone + Ord> TxGraph<A> {
|
||||
None => {
|
||||
self.txs.insert(
|
||||
txid,
|
||||
(TxNodeInternal::Whole(wrapped_tx), BTreeSet::new(), 0),
|
||||
(TxNodeInternal::Whole(wrapped_tx), BTreeSet::new(), None),
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -696,8 +696,8 @@ impl<A: Clone + Ord> TxGraph<A> {
|
||||
|
||||
for (txid, new_last_seen) in changeset.last_seen {
|
||||
let (_, _, last_seen) = self.txs.entry(txid).or_default();
|
||||
if new_last_seen > *last_seen {
|
||||
*last_seen = new_last_seen;
|
||||
if Some(new_last_seen) > *last_seen {
|
||||
*last_seen = Some(new_last_seen);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -710,10 +710,10 @@ impl<A: Clone + Ord> TxGraph<A> {
|
||||
let mut changeset = ChangeSet::<A>::default();
|
||||
|
||||
for (&txid, (update_tx_node, _, update_last_seen)) in &update.txs {
|
||||
let prev_last_seen: u64 = match (self.txs.get(&txid), update_tx_node) {
|
||||
let prev_last_seen = match (self.txs.get(&txid), update_tx_node) {
|
||||
(None, TxNodeInternal::Whole(update_tx)) => {
|
||||
changeset.txs.insert(update_tx.clone());
|
||||
0
|
||||
None
|
||||
}
|
||||
(None, TxNodeInternal::Partial(update_txos)) => {
|
||||
changeset.txouts.extend(
|
||||
@@ -721,7 +721,7 @@ impl<A: Clone + Ord> TxGraph<A> {
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.map(|(&vout, txo)| (OutPoint::new(txid, vout), txo.clone())),
|
||||
);
|
||||
0
|
||||
None
|
||||
}
|
||||
(Some((TxNodeInternal::Whole(_), _, last_seen)), _) => *last_seen,
|
||||
(
|
||||
@@ -746,7 +746,10 @@ impl<A: Clone + Ord> TxGraph<A> {
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
if *update_last_seen > prev_last_seen {
|
||||
changeset.last_seen.insert(txid, *update_last_seen);
|
||||
changeset.last_seen.insert(
|
||||
txid,
|
||||
update_last_seen.expect("checked is greater, so we must have a last_seen"),
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -798,6 +801,13 @@ impl<A: Anchor> TxGraph<A> {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If no anchors are in best chain and we don't have a last_seen, we can return
|
||||
// early because by definition the tx doesn't have a chain position.
|
||||
let last_seen = match last_seen {
|
||||
Some(t) => *t,
|
||||
None => return Ok(None),
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// The tx is not anchored to a block in the best chain, which means that it
|
||||
// might be in mempool, or it might have been dropped already.
|
||||
// Let's check conflicts to find out!
|
||||
@@ -884,7 +894,7 @@ impl<A: Anchor> TxGraph<A> {
|
||||
if conflicting_tx.last_seen_unconfirmed > tx_last_seen {
|
||||
return Ok(None);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if conflicting_tx.last_seen_unconfirmed == *last_seen
|
||||
if conflicting_tx.last_seen_unconfirmed == Some(last_seen)
|
||||
&& conflicting_tx.as_ref().compute_txid() > tx.as_ref().compute_txid()
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Conflicting tx has priority if txid of conflicting tx > txid of original tx
|
||||
@@ -893,7 +903,7 @@ impl<A: Anchor> TxGraph<A> {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(Some(ChainPosition::Unconfirmed(*last_seen)))
|
||||
Ok(Some(ChainPosition::Unconfirmed(last_seen)))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Get the position of the transaction in `chain` with tip `chain_tip`.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -131,9 +131,7 @@ pub fn init_graph<'a, A: Anchor + Clone + 'a>(
|
||||
for anchor in tx_tmp.anchors.iter() {
|
||||
let _ = graph.insert_anchor(tx.compute_txid(), anchor.clone());
|
||||
}
|
||||
if let Some(seen_at) = tx_tmp.last_seen {
|
||||
let _ = graph.insert_seen_at(tx.compute_txid(), seen_at);
|
||||
}
|
||||
let _ = graph.insert_seen_at(tx.compute_txid(), tx_tmp.last_seen.unwrap_or(0));
|
||||
}
|
||||
(graph, spk_index, tx_ids)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -116,8 +116,8 @@ fn insert_relevant_txs() {
|
||||
/// tx1: A Coinbase, sending 70000 sats to "trusted" address. [Block 0]
|
||||
/// tx2: A external Receive, sending 30000 sats to "untrusted" address. [Block 1]
|
||||
/// tx3: Internal Spend. Spends tx2 and returns change of 10000 to "trusted" address. [Block 2]
|
||||
/// tx4: Mempool tx, sending 20000 sats to "trusted" address.
|
||||
/// tx5: Mempool tx, sending 15000 sats to "untested" address.
|
||||
/// tx4: Mempool tx, sending 20000 sats to "untrusted" address.
|
||||
/// tx5: Mempool tx, sending 15000 sats to "trusted" address.
|
||||
/// tx6: Complete unrelated tx. [Block 3]
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Different transactions are added via `insert_relevant_txs`.
|
||||
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ fn test_list_owned_txouts() {
|
||||
let mut untrusted_spks: Vec<ScriptBuf> = Vec::new();
|
||||
|
||||
{
|
||||
// we need to scope here to take immutanble reference of the graph
|
||||
// we need to scope here to take immutable reference of the graph
|
||||
for _ in 0..10 {
|
||||
let ((_, script), _) = graph
|
||||
.index
|
||||
@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ fn test_list_owned_txouts() {
|
||||
..common::new_tx(0)
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// tx5 is spending tx3 and receiving change at trusted keychain, unconfirmed.
|
||||
// tx5 is an external transaction receiving at trusted keychain, unconfirmed.
|
||||
let tx5 = Transaction {
|
||||
output: vec![TxOut {
|
||||
value: Amount::from_sat(15000),
|
||||
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ fn test_list_owned_txouts() {
|
||||
let tx6 = common::new_tx(0);
|
||||
|
||||
// Insert transactions into graph with respective anchors
|
||||
// For unconfirmed txs we pass in `None`.
|
||||
// Insert unconfirmed txs with a last_seen timestamp
|
||||
|
||||
let _ =
|
||||
graph.batch_insert_relevant([&tx1, &tx2, &tx3, &tx6].iter().enumerate().map(|(i, tx)| {
|
||||
@@ -291,9 +291,6 @@ fn test_list_owned_txouts() {
|
||||
|_, spk: &Script| trusted_spks.contains(&spk.to_owned()),
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
assert_eq!(txouts.len(), 5);
|
||||
assert_eq!(utxos.len(), 4);
|
||||
|
||||
let confirmed_txouts_txid = txouts
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.filter_map(|(_, full_txout)| {
|
||||
@@ -359,29 +356,25 @@ fn test_list_owned_txouts() {
|
||||
balance,
|
||||
) = fetch(0, &graph);
|
||||
|
||||
// tx1 is a confirmed txout and is unspent
|
||||
// tx4, tx5 are unconfirmed
|
||||
assert_eq!(confirmed_txouts_txid, [tx1.compute_txid()].into());
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
unconfirmed_txouts_txid,
|
||||
[
|
||||
tx2.compute_txid(),
|
||||
tx3.compute_txid(),
|
||||
tx4.compute_txid(),
|
||||
tx5.compute_txid()
|
||||
]
|
||||
.into()
|
||||
[tx4.compute_txid(), tx5.compute_txid()].into()
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
assert_eq!(confirmed_utxos_txid, [tx1.compute_txid()].into());
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
unconfirmed_utxos_txid,
|
||||
[tx3.compute_txid(), tx4.compute_txid(), tx5.compute_txid()].into()
|
||||
[tx4.compute_txid(), tx5.compute_txid()].into()
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
balance,
|
||||
Balance {
|
||||
immature: Amount::from_sat(70000), // immature coinbase
|
||||
trusted_pending: Amount::from_sat(25000), // tx3 + tx5
|
||||
trusted_pending: Amount::from_sat(15000), // tx5
|
||||
untrusted_pending: Amount::from_sat(20000), // tx4
|
||||
confirmed: Amount::ZERO // Nothing is confirmed yet
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -405,23 +398,26 @@ fn test_list_owned_txouts() {
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
unconfirmed_txouts_txid,
|
||||
[tx3.compute_txid(), tx4.compute_txid(), tx5.compute_txid()].into()
|
||||
[tx4.compute_txid(), tx5.compute_txid()].into()
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// tx2 doesn't get into confirmed utxos set
|
||||
assert_eq!(confirmed_utxos_txid, [tx1.compute_txid()].into());
|
||||
// tx2 gets into confirmed utxos set
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
confirmed_utxos_txid,
|
||||
[tx1.compute_txid(), tx2.compute_txid()].into()
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
unconfirmed_utxos_txid,
|
||||
[tx3.compute_txid(), tx4.compute_txid(), tx5.compute_txid()].into()
|
||||
[tx4.compute_txid(), tx5.compute_txid()].into()
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
balance,
|
||||
Balance {
|
||||
immature: Amount::from_sat(70000), // immature coinbase
|
||||
trusted_pending: Amount::from_sat(25000), // tx3 + tx5
|
||||
trusted_pending: Amount::from_sat(15000), // tx5
|
||||
untrusted_pending: Amount::from_sat(20000), // tx4
|
||||
confirmed: Amount::ZERO // Nothing is confirmed yet
|
||||
confirmed: Amount::from_sat(30_000) // tx2 got confirmed
|
||||
}
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -477,6 +473,7 @@ fn test_list_owned_txouts() {
|
||||
balance,
|
||||
) = fetch(98, &graph);
|
||||
|
||||
// no change compared to block 2
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
confirmed_txouts_txid,
|
||||
[tx1.compute_txid(), tx2.compute_txid(), tx3.compute_txid()].into()
|
||||
@@ -502,14 +499,14 @@ fn test_list_owned_txouts() {
|
||||
immature: Amount::from_sat(70000), // immature coinbase
|
||||
trusted_pending: Amount::from_sat(15000), // tx5
|
||||
untrusted_pending: Amount::from_sat(20000), // tx4
|
||||
confirmed: Amount::from_sat(10000) // tx1 got matured
|
||||
confirmed: Amount::from_sat(10000) // tx3 is confirmed
|
||||
}
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// AT Block 99
|
||||
{
|
||||
let (_, _, _, _, balance) = fetch(100, &graph);
|
||||
let (_, _, _, _, balance) = fetch(99, &graph);
|
||||
|
||||
// Coinbase maturity hits
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -977,16 +977,6 @@ fn test_chain_spends() {
|
||||
}))
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Even if unconfirmed tx has a last_seen of 0, it can still be part of a chain spend.
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
graph.get_chain_spend(
|
||||
&local_chain,
|
||||
tip.block_id(),
|
||||
OutPoint::new(tx_0.compute_txid(), 1)
|
||||
),
|
||||
Some((ChainPosition::Unconfirmed(0), tx_2.compute_txid())),
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Mark the unconfirmed as seen and check correct ObservedAs status is returned.
|
||||
let _ = graph.insert_seen_at(tx_2.compute_txid(), 1234567);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1099,10 +1089,10 @@ fn update_last_seen_unconfirmed() {
|
||||
let txid = tx.compute_txid();
|
||||
|
||||
// insert a new tx
|
||||
// initially we have a last_seen of 0, and no anchors
|
||||
// initially we have a last_seen of None and no anchors
|
||||
let _ = graph.insert_tx(tx);
|
||||
let tx = graph.full_txs().next().unwrap();
|
||||
assert_eq!(tx.last_seen_unconfirmed, 0);
|
||||
assert_eq!(tx.last_seen_unconfirmed, None);
|
||||
assert!(tx.anchors.is_empty());
|
||||
|
||||
// higher timestamp should update last seen
|
||||
@@ -1117,7 +1107,15 @@ fn update_last_seen_unconfirmed() {
|
||||
let _ = graph.insert_anchor(txid, ());
|
||||
let changeset = graph.update_last_seen_unconfirmed(4);
|
||||
assert!(changeset.is_empty());
|
||||
assert_eq!(graph.full_txs().next().unwrap().last_seen_unconfirmed, 2);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
graph
|
||||
.full_txs()
|
||||
.next()
|
||||
.unwrap()
|
||||
.last_seen_unconfirmed
|
||||
.unwrap(),
|
||||
2
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user