ref(tx_graph)!: Rename list_chain_txs to list_canonical_txs
This commit is contained in:
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ struct Scenario<'a> {
|
||||
name: &'a str,
|
||||
/// Transaction templates
|
||||
tx_templates: &'a [TxTemplate<'a, BlockId>],
|
||||
/// Names of txs that must exist in the output of `list_chain_txs`
|
||||
/// Names of txs that must exist in the output of `list_canonical_txs`
|
||||
exp_chain_txs: HashSet<&'a str>,
|
||||
/// Outpoints that must exist in the output of `filter_chain_txouts`
|
||||
exp_chain_txouts: HashSet<(&'a str, u32)>,
|
||||
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ struct Scenario<'a> {
|
||||
|
||||
/// This test ensures that [`TxGraph`] will reliably filter out irrelevant transactions when
|
||||
/// presented with multiple conflicting transaction scenarios using the [`TxTemplate`] structure.
|
||||
/// This test also checks that [`TxGraph::list_chain_txs`], [`TxGraph::filter_chain_txouts`],
|
||||
/// This test also checks that [`TxGraph::list_canonical_txs`], [`TxGraph::filter_chain_txouts`],
|
||||
/// [`TxGraph::filter_chain_unspents`], and [`TxGraph::balance`] return correct data.
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn test_tx_conflict_handling() {
|
||||
@@ -597,7 +597,7 @@ fn test_tx_conflict_handling() {
|
||||
let (tx_graph, spk_index, exp_tx_ids) = init_graph(scenario.tx_templates.iter());
|
||||
|
||||
let txs = tx_graph
|
||||
.list_chain_txs(&local_chain, chain_tip)
|
||||
.list_canonical_txs(&local_chain, chain_tip)
|
||||
.map(|tx| tx.tx_node.txid)
|
||||
.collect::<BTreeSet<_>>();
|
||||
let exp_txs = scenario
|
||||
@@ -607,7 +607,7 @@ fn test_tx_conflict_handling() {
|
||||
.collect::<BTreeSet<_>>();
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
txs, exp_txs,
|
||||
"\n[{}] 'list_chain_txs' failed",
|
||||
"\n[{}] 'list_canonical_txs' failed",
|
||||
scenario.name
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user