Fix: Wallet sync may decrement address index

This bug seems to be Electrum-specific. The fix is to check the
proposed changes against the current state of the database. Ensure
newly suggested indexes are not smaller than indexes already in
database.

Changes:
* Check index updates before they are applied to database during
  Electrum Blockchain sync (Thank you @rajarshimaitra for providing
  an elegant solution).

Tests added:
* bdk_blockchain_tests!::test_sync_address_index_should_not_decrement
* bdk_blockchain_tests!::test_sync_address_index_should_increment

These tests ensure there will be no unexpected address reuse when
grabbing a new address via `Wallet::get_address` with `AddressIndex::New`.

Other changes:
* Tweak `rpc.rs` so that clippy is happy.
This commit is contained in:
志宇 2022-07-03 14:32:05 +08:00
parent 4bd1fd2441
commit af6bde3997
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: F6345C9837C2BDE8
4 changed files with 77 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0
- Get block hash given a block height - A `get_block_hash` method is now defined on the `GetBlockHash` trait and implemented on every blockchain backend. This method expects a block height and returns the corresponding block hash.
- Add `remove_partial_sigs` and `try_finalize` to `SignOptions`
- Deprecate `AddressValidator`
- Fix Electrum wallet sync potentially causing address index decrement - compare proposed index and current index before applying batch operations during sync.
## [v0.19.0] - [v0.18.0]

View File

@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ impl WalletSync for RpcBlockchain {
),
received,
sent,
fee: tx_result.fee.map(|f| f.as_sat().abs() as u64),
fee: tx_result.fee.map(|f| f.as_sat().unsigned_abs()),
};
debug!(
"saving tx: {} tx_result.fee:{:?} td.fees:{:?}",

View File

@ -314,6 +314,22 @@ impl<'a, D: BatchDatabase> State<'a, D> {
let finished_txs = make_txs_consistent(&self.finished_txs);
let observed_txids: HashSet<Txid> = finished_txs.iter().map(|tx| tx.txid).collect();
let txids_to_delete = existing_txids.difference(&observed_txids);
// Ensure `last_active_index` does not decrement database's current state.
let index_updates = self
.last_active_index
.iter()
.map(|(keychain, sync_index)| {
let sync_index = *sync_index as u32;
let index_res = match self.db.get_last_index(*keychain) {
Ok(Some(db_index)) => Ok(std::cmp::max(db_index, sync_index)),
Ok(None) => Ok(sync_index),
Err(err) => Err(err),
};
index_res.map(|index| (*keychain, index))
})
.collect::<Result<Vec<(KeychainKind, u32)>, _>>()?;
let mut batch = self.db.begin_batch();
// Delete old txs that no longer exist
@ -377,8 +393,10 @@ impl<'a, D: BatchDatabase> State<'a, D> {
batch.set_tx(finished_tx)?;
}
for (keychain, last_active_index) in self.last_active_index {
batch.set_last_index(keychain, last_active_index as u32)?;
// apply index updates
for (keychain, new_index) in index_updates {
debug!("updating index ({}, {})", keychain.as_byte(), new_index);
batch.set_last_index(keychain, new_index)?;
}
info!(

View File

@ -372,6 +372,7 @@ macro_rules! bdk_blockchain_tests {
use $crate::blockchain::Blockchain;
use $crate::database::MemoryDatabase;
use $crate::types::KeychainKind;
use $crate::wallet::AddressIndex;
use $crate::{Wallet, FeeRate, SyncOptions};
use $crate::testutils;
@ -651,6 +652,60 @@ macro_rules! bdk_blockchain_tests {
assert_eq!(wallet.list_unspent().unwrap().len(), 1, "incorrect number of unspents");
}
// Syncing wallet should not result in wallet address index to decrement.
// This is critical as we should always ensure to not reuse addresses.
#[test]
fn test_sync_address_index_should_not_decrement() {
let (wallet, blockchain, _descriptors, mut test_client) = init_single_sig();
const ADDRS_TO_FUND: u32 = 7;
const ADDRS_TO_IGNORE: u32 = 11;
let mut first_addr_index: u32 = 0;
(0..ADDRS_TO_FUND + ADDRS_TO_IGNORE).for_each(|i| {
let new_addr = wallet.get_address(AddressIndex::New).unwrap();
if i == 0 {
first_addr_index = new_addr.index;
}
assert_eq!(new_addr.index, i+first_addr_index, "unexpected new address index (before sync)");
if i < ADDRS_TO_FUND {
test_client.receive(testutils! {
@tx ((@addr new_addr.address) => 50_000)
});
}
});
wallet.sync(&blockchain, SyncOptions::default()).unwrap();
let new_addr = wallet.get_address(AddressIndex::New).unwrap();
assert_eq!(new_addr.index, ADDRS_TO_FUND+ADDRS_TO_IGNORE+first_addr_index, "unexpected new address index (after sync)");
}
// Even if user does not explicitly grab new addresses, the address index should
// increment after sync (if wallet has a balance).
#[test]
fn test_sync_address_index_should_increment() {
let (wallet, blockchain, descriptors, mut test_client) = init_single_sig();
const START_FUND: u32 = 4;
const END_FUND: u32 = 20;
// "secretly" fund wallet via given range
(START_FUND..END_FUND).for_each(|addr_index| {
test_client.receive(testutils! {
@tx ((@external descriptors, addr_index) => 50_000)
});
});
wallet.sync(&blockchain, SyncOptions::default()).unwrap();
let address = wallet.get_address(AddressIndex::New).unwrap();
assert_eq!(address.index, END_FUND, "unexpected new address index (after sync)");
}
/// Send two conflicting transactions to the same address twice in a row.
/// The coins should only be received once!
#[test]