docs: fix spelling errors
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# BDK Esplora
|
||||
|
||||
BDK Esplora extends [`esplora_client`](crate::esplora_client) to update [`bdk_chain`] structures
|
||||
BDK Esplora extends [`esplora-client`] to update [`bdk_chain`] structures
|
||||
from an Esplora server.
|
||||
|
||||
## Usage
|
||||
@@ -31,3 +31,6 @@ use bdk_esplora::EsploraExt;
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
For full examples, refer to [`example-crates/wallet_esplora`](https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk/tree/master/example-crates/wallet_esplora) (blocking) and [`example-crates/wallet_esplora_async`](https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk/tree/master/example-crates/wallet_esplora_async).
|
||||
|
||||
[`esplora-client`]: https://docs.rs/esplora-client/
|
||||
[`bdk_chain`]: https://docs.rs/bdk-chain/
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ impl EsploraAsyncExt for esplora_client::AsyncClient {
|
||||
|
||||
// the updated hash (block hash at this height after the update), can either be:
|
||||
// 1. a block that already existed in `fetched_blocks`
|
||||
// 2. a block that exists locally and atleast has a depth of ASSUME_FINAL_DEPTH
|
||||
// 2. a block that exists locally and at least has a depth of ASSUME_FINAL_DEPTH
|
||||
// 3. otherwise we can freshly fetch the block from remote, which is safe as it
|
||||
// is guaranteed that this would be at or below ASSUME_FINAL_DEPTH from the
|
||||
// remote tip
|
||||
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ impl EsploraAsyncExt for esplora_client::AsyncClient {
|
||||
let first_new_height = *fetched_blocks
|
||||
.keys()
|
||||
.next()
|
||||
.expect("must have atleast one new block");
|
||||
.expect("must have at least one new block");
|
||||
if first_new_height >= local_block.height {
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ impl EsploraAsyncExt for esplora_client::AsyncClient {
|
||||
let (&height, &hash) = fetched_blocks
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.next()
|
||||
.expect("must have atleast one new block");
|
||||
.expect("must have at least one new block");
|
||||
CheckPoint::new(BlockId { height, hash })
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ impl EsploraExt for esplora_client::BlockingClient {
|
||||
|
||||
// the updated hash (block hash at this height after the update), can either be:
|
||||
// 1. a block that already existed in `fetched_blocks`
|
||||
// 2. a block that exists locally and atleast has a depth of ASSUME_FINAL_DEPTH
|
||||
// 2. a block that exists locally and at least has a depth of ASSUME_FINAL_DEPTH
|
||||
// 3. otherwise we can freshly fetch the block from remote, which is safe as it
|
||||
// is guaranteed that this would be at or below ASSUME_FINAL_DEPTH from the
|
||||
// remote tip
|
||||
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ impl EsploraExt for esplora_client::BlockingClient {
|
||||
let first_new_height = *fetched_blocks
|
||||
.keys()
|
||||
.next()
|
||||
.expect("must have atleast one new block");
|
||||
.expect("must have at least one new block");
|
||||
if first_new_height >= local_block.height {
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ impl EsploraExt for esplora_client::BlockingClient {
|
||||
let (&height, &hash) = fetched_blocks
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.next()
|
||||
.expect("must have atleast one new block");
|
||||
.expect("must have at least one new block");
|
||||
CheckPoint::new(BlockId { height, hash })
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user