Merge bitcoindevkit/bdk#1269: Revamp KeychainTxOutIndex API to be safer
71fff1613dfeat(chain): add txout methods to `KeychainTxOutIndex` (志宇)83e7b7ec40docs(chain): improve `KeychainTxOutIndex` docs (志宇)9294e30943docs(wallet): improve docs for unbounded spk iterator methods (志宇)b74c2e2622fix(wallet): use efficient peek address logic (志宇)81aeaba48afeat(chain): add `SpkIterator::descriptor` method (志宇)c7b47af72frefactor(chain)!: revamp `KeychainTxOutIndex` API (志宇)705690ee8ffeat(chain): make output of `SpkTxOutIndex::unused_spks` cloneable (志宇) Pull request description: Closes #1268 ### Description Previously `SpkTxOutIndex` methods can be called from `KeychainTxOutIndex` due to the `DeRef` implementation. However, the internal `SpkTxOut` will also contain lookahead spks resulting in an error-prone API. `SpkTxOutIndex` methods are now not directly callable from `KeychainTxOutIndex`. Methods of `KeychainTxOutIndex` are renamed for clarity. I.e. methods that return an unbounded spk iter are prefixed with `unbounded`. In addition to this, I also optimized the peek-address logic of `bdk::Wallet` using the optimized `<SpkIterator as Iterator>::nth` implementation. ### Notes to the reviewers This is mostly refactoring, but can also be considered a bug-fix (as the API before was very problematic). ### Changelog notice Changed * Wallet's peek-address logic is optimized by making use of `<SpkIterator as Iterator>::nth`. * `KeychainTxOutIndex` API is refactored to better differentiate between methods that return unbounded vs stored spks. * `KeychainTxOutIndex` no longer directly exposes `SpkTxOutIndex` methods via `DeRef`. This was problematic because `SpkTxOutIndex` also contains lookahead spks which we want to hide. Added * `SpkIterator::descriptor` method which gets a reference to the internal descriptor. ### Checklists #### All Submissions: * [x] I've signed all my commits * [x] I followed the [contribution guidelines](https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) * [x] I ran `cargo fmt` and `cargo clippy` before committing #### New Features: ~* [ ] I've added tests for the new feature~ * [x] I've added docs for the new feature #### Bugfixes: * [x] This pull request breaks the existing API * [ ] I've added tests to reproduce the issue which are now passing * [x] I'm linking the issue being fixed by this PR ACKs for top commit: danielabrozzoni: ACK71fff1613dTree-SHA512: f29c7d2311d0e81c4fe29b8f57c219c24db958194fad5de82bb6d42d562d37fd5d152be7ee03a3f00843be5760569ad29b848250267a548d7d15320fd5292a8f
This commit is contained in:
@@ -95,25 +95,25 @@ fn test_lookahead() {
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
txout_index
|
||||
.revealed_spks_of_keychain(&TestKeychain::External)
|
||||
.revealed_keychain_spks(&TestKeychain::External)
|
||||
.count(),
|
||||
index as usize + 1,
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
txout_index
|
||||
.revealed_spks_of_keychain(&TestKeychain::Internal)
|
||||
.revealed_keychain_spks(&TestKeychain::Internal)
|
||||
.count(),
|
||||
0,
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
txout_index
|
||||
.unused_spks_of_keychain(&TestKeychain::External)
|
||||
.unused_keychain_spks(&TestKeychain::External)
|
||||
.count(),
|
||||
index as usize + 1,
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
txout_index
|
||||
.unused_spks_of_keychain(&TestKeychain::Internal)
|
||||
.unused_keychain_spks(&TestKeychain::Internal)
|
||||
.count(),
|
||||
0,
|
||||
);
|
||||
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ fn test_lookahead() {
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
txout_index
|
||||
.revealed_spks_of_keychain(&TestKeychain::Internal)
|
||||
.revealed_keychain_spks(&TestKeychain::Internal)
|
||||
.count(),
|
||||
25,
|
||||
);
|
||||
@@ -199,13 +199,13 @@ fn test_lookahead() {
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
txout_index
|
||||
.revealed_spks_of_keychain(&TestKeychain::External)
|
||||
.revealed_keychain_spks(&TestKeychain::External)
|
||||
.count(),
|
||||
last_external_index as usize + 1,
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
txout_index
|
||||
.revealed_spks_of_keychain(&TestKeychain::Internal)
|
||||
.revealed_keychain_spks(&TestKeychain::Internal)
|
||||
.count(),
|
||||
last_internal_index as usize + 1,
|
||||
);
|
||||
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ fn test_wildcard_derivations() {
|
||||
|
||||
(0..=15)
|
||||
.chain([17, 20, 23])
|
||||
.for_each(|index| assert!(txout_index.mark_used(&TestKeychain::External, index)));
|
||||
.for_each(|index| assert!(txout_index.mark_used(TestKeychain::External, index)));
|
||||
|
||||
assert_eq!(txout_index.next_index(&TestKeychain::External), (26, true));
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ fn test_wildcard_derivations() {
|
||||
// - Use all the derived till 26.
|
||||
// - next_unused() = ((27, <spk>), keychain::ChangeSet)
|
||||
(0..=26).for_each(|index| {
|
||||
txout_index.mark_used(&TestKeychain::External, index);
|
||||
txout_index.mark_used(TestKeychain::External, index);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
let (spk, changeset) = txout_index.next_unused_spk(&TestKeychain::External);
|
||||
@@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ fn test_non_wildcard_derivations() {
|
||||
// - derive new and next unused should return the old script
|
||||
// - store_up_to should not panic and return empty changeset
|
||||
assert_eq!(txout_index.next_index(&TestKeychain::External), (0, false));
|
||||
txout_index.mark_used(&TestKeychain::External, 0);
|
||||
txout_index.mark_used(TestKeychain::External, 0);
|
||||
|
||||
let (spk, changeset) = txout_index.reveal_next_spk(&TestKeychain::External);
|
||||
assert_eq!(spk, (0, external_spk.as_script()));
|
||||
@@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ fn test_non_wildcard_derivations() {
|
||||
// we check that spks_of_keychain returns a SpkIterator with just one element
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
txout_index
|
||||
.spks_of_keychain(&TestKeychain::External)
|
||||
.revealed_keychain_spks(&TestKeychain::External)
|
||||
.count(),
|
||||
1,
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user