esplora: fix incorrect gap limit check in blocking client

The gap limit was checked such as if the last_index was not None but the
last_active_index was, we'd consider having reached it. But the
last_index is never None for this check. This effectively made it so the
gap limit was always 1: if the first address isn't used
last_active_index will be None and we'd return immediately.

Fix this by avoiding error-prone Option comparisons and correctly
checking we've reached the gap limit before breaking out of the loop.
This commit is contained in:
Antoine Poinsot 2023-11-20 10:34:10 +01:00
parent 9e681b39fb
commit 18bd329617
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: E13FC145CD3F4304

View File

@ -250,7 +250,13 @@ impl EsploraExt for esplora_client::BlockingClient {
} }
} }
if last_index > last_active_index.map(|i| i.saturating_add(stop_gap as u32)) { let last_index = last_index.expect("Must be set since handles wasn't empty.");
let past_gap_limit = if let Some(i) = last_active_index {
last_index > i.saturating_add(stop_gap as u32)
} else {
last_index >= stop_gap as u32
};
if past_gap_limit {
break; break;
} }
} }