94a7f09de6ed1899372bf14f6202629e27dc1512 doc: Drop outdated note (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
It is outdated since bitcoin/bitcoin#23060.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK 94a7f09de6ed1899372bf14f6202629e27dc1512
theStack:
Code-review ACK 94a7f09de6ed1899372bf14f6202629e27dc1512
Tree-SHA512: 5a98cf39c3939845d1abb64cb62dbb9bdb1135aa07a5cd0d85de7b6a6d9a3397b0e5da06cdb89991aac31151cb3c0d38eacf4898c53014cb7f7600e992230f87
This serves as a replacement for the getnewaddress RPC if no wallet is
available. In addition to the address, it also returns the corresponding
public key and output script (scriptPubKey).
fafe4dea16c93ac8d5cd5eee872dfb8427d7809a test: Fix pep8 of touched file (MarcoFalke)
fa0ac9d7e36ec616cd673b9041f0e54b9f32d5b0 test: Fix rpc_scantxoutset intermittent issue (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
I fail to see how this could have ever worked, since there is nothing that prevents the wallet from spending the coins in the utxo set.
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/23847
Longer term it would be nice to remove the wallet and use MiniWallet here.
ACKs for top commit:
brunoerg:
tACK fafe4dea16c93ac8d5cd5eee872dfb8427d7809a
theStack:
Code-review ACK fafe4dea16c93ac8d5cd5eee872dfb8427d7809a
Tree-SHA512: d92b7be9a81eb62f496488dd15b8e564e9b7a64b55634af2714b53f985e6a35fdae788323833ff59c40ae7c6a0cf54fe069db8eb3be03686f7c100379f54a292
faaf9da20a2920fe52ec4efa1e9a07090c089cb3 test: Add missing suppressions for crypto_diff_fuzz_chacha20.cpp (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Without them, CI and fuzzing is broken
ACKs for top commit:
stratospher:
ACK faaf9da. The changes look good to me.
Tree-SHA512: 46604ba1b6eb8ea321e55e043835ca1e7a4f562855007b08cf9cf96d9a7f2a0155009ca1397f34338e478b8cc5b5a6a0dc94e1878a2f00bfab11595ae58bb014
c27bba96723384488fb6995e21bb43969d94b0f6 test: check for invalid listtransactions RPC parameters (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds missing test coverage for RPC errors that are thrown if invalid parameters are passed to `listtransactions`:
887796a5ff/src/wallet/rpc/transactions.cpp (L508)887796a5ff/src/wallet/rpc/transactions.cpp (L524)887796a5ff/src/wallet/rpc/transactions.cpp (L526)
ACKs for top commit:
shaavan:
ACK c27bba96723384488fb6995e21bb43969d94b0f6
Tree-SHA512: e5a23590186b4d9663261ff6cea52ac45e9bf2f2ef693c22b3452bb07af9b800fdabc2a94fd2852c686c28214a496d7afe296e41831759f2182feac2482635d0
7b481f015a0386f5ee3e13415474952653ddc198 Fix Racy ParseOpCode function initialization (Jeremy Rubin)
Pull request description:
If multiple callers call ParseOpCode concurrently it will cause a race condition. We can either move the static to it's own area and require init be called explicitly, or just allow concurrent first callers to race to fill in an atomic variable that never changes thereafter. The second approach is taken here.
Static initialization *is* threadsafe, but only insofar as definining the variable being guaranteed to be called once. This is used incorrectly here.
practicalswift --> are there tools we can deploy to catch usage like this?
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 7b481f015a0386f5ee3e13415474952653ddc198 🗣
Tree-SHA512: cbf9dc3af26d7335305026f32ce8472a018309b89b3d81a67357e59fbeed72c37b5b8a6e30325ea68145c3b2403867be82de01f22decefb6e6717cf0c0045633
2da97b271b23225c394217ebc7b37999e34e345e ci: use GCC 8 when building packages in native_qt5 CI (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Our minimum required GCC is GCC 8, and this change in required for
PRs like #23839 which take advantage of flags introduced in that
version of GCC.
This should have been included as part of 182de7ba10811ec39e24ec5bec7cd2119f776f2f.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK 2da97b271b23225c394217ebc7b37999e34e345e
hebasto:
ACK 2da97b271b23225c394217ebc7b37999e34e345e
Tree-SHA512: 2b64c21119fb95b959ac0f7d8d2d38f6ed98309695bb35425fad45b3b628247c2c78d0647c4d1f511669e8d333c6febe1cc44fac8027ed0bd7593eb630add548
ff5f6dea5336075d1a6cace1112be3252d97540b scripted-diff: Rename interfaces::WalletClient to interfaces::WalletLoader (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Name has been confusing since it was introduced, and it was pointed in recent review club https://bitcoincore.reviews/10102 that it was particularly unclear how `interfaces::WalletClient` was different from `interfaces::Wallet`.
ACKs for top commit:
w0xlt:
ACK ff5f6de
Tree-SHA512: 26fa10baa457e76da1933adab187e9be61b8d76cff1cf2c73ad4320461c7e31fb9db07b7c2486998294826beb4a1aca255c14903920b443db6213e653c5f7e0a
826e12b010eda4238f9e8cd875e8915a405bed0d test: call VerifyLoadedChainstate during ChainTestingSetup (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
for additional coverage and similarity to actual init process.
Followup to #23280.
ACKs for top commit:
dongcarl:
Code Review ACK 826e12b010eda4238f9e8cd875e8915a405bed0d
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 826e12b010eda4238f9e8cd875e8915a405bed0d
Tree-SHA512: a4e7fd25e5d7a08b1e154ae6daf67c3048260a2684b0e569b544dd826693b7b969db9923b191e499cb8d8d0a2a73eb9330ff45909313145a9abb6052eb8c3ad9
Our minimum required GCC is GCC 8, and this change in required for
changes like #23839 which take advantage of flags introduced in that
version of GCC.
This should have been included as part of
182de7ba10811ec39e24ec5bec7cd2119f776f2f.
Name has been confusing since it was introduced, and it was pointed in
recent review club as https://bitcoincore.reviews/10102 that it was
particularly unclear how interfaces::WalletClient was different from
interfaces::Wallet.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
ren() { git grep -l "$1" src | xargs sed -i "s/$1/$2/g"; }
ren WalletClient WalletLoader
ren walletClient walletLoader
ren wallet_client wallet_loader
ren "wallet clients release the wallet" "wallet pointer owners release the wallet"
ren "wallet client" "wallet loader"
ren "Wallet client" "Wallet loader"
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
c9a77e227eecf357c7dd550efb8c1827bb99a5de gui: address type dropdown, add bech32m (Sjors Provoost)
56113daef4830cad1af3c00f6b3c447c9e2a8e05 wallet: add taprootEnabled() to interface (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
This PR replaces the Bech32 checkbox with an address type dropdown It "Use Taproot" checkbox to the receive screen for any wallet with a Taproot descriptor. The Bech32m option is hidden for wallets that don't have taproot descriptors.
Bech32 is kept as the default even for Taproot enabled wallets until it's more widely supported.
(an earlier attempt of this PR added a second checkbox)
<img width="469" alt="Schermafbeelding 2021-12-21 om 11 44 05" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/146872660-339fae1f-c0b8-4673-b8be-33c25f3933fd.png">
**Suggested testing**
* notice that the Bech32m entry only appears for wallet with a taproot descriptor
* verify that it generates a bc1p instead of bc1q address
1. Legacy wallet
2. Default descriptor wallet (current does not have taproot descriptor)
3. Wallet with taproot descriptor:
* just create a new descriptor wallet
Replaces https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22260
ACKs for top commit:
Rspigler:
tACK c9a77e227eecf357c7dd550efb8c1827bb99a5de. I like the changes made now, thanks!
kristapsk:
re-ACK c9a77e227eecf357c7dd550efb8c1827bb99a5de
Tree-SHA512: bae66ac90ed55372e6c94878db0e37d32b7b5c24ed00c0f2ebb10fd127dddce3a061162df915d67e92d7b35b3da093137db17b73931a0ae1a470fff20be1f30b
a2a92317ad4ab88cfca234f68337a7cd37897f10 rpc: Add warning to user about newkeypool command (Samuel Dobson)
Pull request description:
This PR prevents `newkeypool` from being run on non-HD wallets, because this would require a new backup every time, so it isn't very safe.
David Harding also suggested [here](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23093#issuecomment-945350003) that the RPC help text should include a warning to the users about the interaction between newkeypool.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK a2a92317ad4ab88cfca234f68337a7cd37897f10
Tree-SHA512: 0aa497900f1d179764bce13ffce0bb081ba2ca354492bf2e04b21d0212e960b3ed13a386fbf65602b6b50461f4056a0285752ef707d312da28e82449cd8ea048
fada6c65d23f7bd4682fac281026612b835c4f8b wallet: Strictly match tx change type to improve privacy (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Currently the change type will only match a destination by accident, making it easier to determine the change.
Fix that by strictly matching one of the destinations.
ACKs for top commit:
S3RK:
Concept & Approach ACK fada6c6. Also did light code review .
achow101:
ACK fada6c65d23f7bd4682fac281026612b835c4f8b
prayank23:
tACK fada6c65d2
w0xlt:
tACK fada6c6
Tree-SHA512: 2b072c3c32debac7b0bef07a6df9a8f1a631e0f7d556b859973f18894ca490225582dc13e4588b29fa205ffbcd30fb632d5313b304d10ad17a26adc3f7684471
140a49ce5e547a1b520a7cd063af8308184e7cbf test: check that pruneblockchain RPC fails for future block or timestamp (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds missing test coverage for the `pruneblockchain` RPC for the case that a future block or timestamp is passed:
8c0bd871fc/src/rpc/blockchain.cpp (L1101)8c0bd871fc/src/rpc/blockchain.cpp (L1111)
Note that the test method `manual_test` gets called twice, once each with `use_timestamp` set to True/False, respectively. Depending on that, the helper function `height` either converts the passed block height to the timestamp of that block, or just returns it without modification.
The other tests for failures in this RPC are also changed to be more detailled ("Cannot prune blocks because node is not in prune mode", "Negative block height"), as I don't think there is any value in just checking a sub-string. If there is ever an error with the same sub-string is introduced, it's not clear which error is exactly checked with the test, so it makes sense to be as specific as possible.
ACKs for top commit:
brunoerg:
tACK 140a49ce5e547a1b520a7cd063af8308184e7cbf
Tree-SHA512: bee3cee9f35c2a63a1839d7ec1f83e354d9d3c0c2ca32d300dca2de8b755d555f769ba2b80ac37d31df6ee7e2b8eaefb8134c4727a7144e47c0f5e34f2cc5822
cfeb1942bc9e80be59ef3c2f122d254290db5347 ci: Use Cirrus "greedy" flag to use idle CPU time when available (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
Disabled for MSan to avoid excessive RAM usage
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 4351d477b8749b3578a1f808ba7e963a44e0a4a1b695605b473ab3cf424d75ade6e13e7401a39675843e7c9b48a3e46936909d6bcc4af1f7abe1b690fe5b7a55
92082ea0bb62ab6ec723b57ca4f2b2c5f6b28469 Change time variable type to std::chrono::seconds in src/net_processing.cpp (Shashwat)
Pull request description:
- This is a follow-up to PR #23758
- This changes the remaining time variable in `net_processing.cpp` from **int64_t** to **std::chrono::seconds**
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK 92082ea0bb62ab6ec723b57ca4f2b2c5f6b28469
hebasto:
re-ACK 92082ea0bb62ab6ec723b57ca4f2b2c5f6b28469
Tree-SHA512: 559e351d9046d4ba2b842ae38da13b4befc7feee71f0762f97907812471e2840b0d43c90c92222d15619fe40cc21f11d40900500ca07b470f7ac8b0046cc1d68
82858bab64274506cfcd365a6588a1a9141fb22c [doc] CPFP carve out and single-conflict RBF exemption (glozow)
1fd49eb498c75a1d14193bb736d195a3dc75ae12 [doc] clarify RBF difference from BIP125 (glozow)
919ae8b8cdeccfc04026293153b876e27469a027 [doc] current rbf policy (glozow)
Pull request description:
Since RBF was first implemented and BIP125 was written, our code has changed, people have highlighted implementation differences, and some people have proposed further changes to it. Many people seem to support the idea of documenting our _current_ RBF policy as it stands today.
As the ancestor/descendant limit carve-out exemptions are very related to RBF, it seemed appropriate to group them with this PR.
Related to #22806 - it seems that these policies are the most confusing for people, or at least the most documentation-requested.
ACKs for top commit:
dunxen:
ACK 82858ba
t-bast:
ACK 82858bab64, thanks @glozow!
darosior:
re-ACK 82858bab64274506cfcd365a6588a1a9141fb22c
ariard:
ACK 82858ba
Tree-SHA512: 5d296537cce3488c18179c0aa76c739ca02fdc424e5aa17129b4cdd0d057358f86bcc1e92a9857bd2c60495f834fe9d9406d1a9f8ac5cfc8f0f4f4c27ec4f8e1
bf4f8171352e9b384b42c91da61dfc9c3ca89ed8 refactor: addrman_select test (josibake)
5a64dc018c04ce16202a8e58ce92d2657c0b1806 refactor: addrman_evictionworks test (josibake)
e281fccd8a80d7cd48c3b17d58fd4a8915e1e965 refactor: addrman_noevict test (josibake)
8bdd9240d4310aafa1332159355f106a8fcfc5c9 refactor: addrman_selecttriedcollisions test (josibake)
Pull request description:
As a follow-up to #23713 , this PR refactors the remaining tests in `src/tests/addrman_tests.cpp` to use the output from `AddrMan::Good()` where appropriate.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK bf4f8171352e9b384b42c91da61dfc9c3ca89ed8
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK bf4f8171352e9b384b42c91da61dfc9c3ca89ed8
Tree-SHA512: 93cc127aecff42c1c174daa04911af7e3460a5c40ddf96952fe4a6ab86fa1ff22d66724326abb709008d7f9f79c26c55c6d62753c40059c9ac60f869507ec913
0a1b6fa5a18f3efb2ac3e28a23a4fd5e1cf9eaf0 test: fix intermittent timeouts in p2p_timeouts.py (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
Fixes #23800 by making sure that all peers are connected (i.e. `m_connected` is set) before the mocktime is bumped.
We can't wait for verack here, but we can wait for a debug log entry ("Added connection peer=2") instead.
In the failed CI runs (e.g. https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5600553806856192?logs=ci#L7469) different peers were added at different mocktimes.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK 0a1b6fa5a18f3efb2ac3e28a23a4fd5e1cf9eaf0
theStack:
Concept and approach ACK 0a1b6fa5a18f3efb2ac3e28a23a4fd5e1cf9eaf0
Tree-SHA512: 1a3c8a9a79339d4adc6ecb1731eb0d0eadb2e5024ad3c6779b4696691f85d6c3304ef8689746d0332150a4cf04489ca4b2ff3eeb0bb76feec28c1e4bb9dbca19
2b64fa3251ac5ff4b4d174f1f0be7226490dce87 Update REST docs with new accessors (Matt Corallo)
ef7c8228fd5cf45526518ae2bd5ebdd483e65525 Expose block filters over REST. (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
This adds a new rest endpoint:
/rest/blockfilter/filtertype/requesttype/blockhash (eg
/rest/blockfilter/basic/header/000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f.hex)
which exposes either the filter "header" or the filter data itself.
Most of the code is cribbed from the equivalent RPC.
You can test it at 000000005b.hex
ACKs for top commit:
dergoegge:
ACK 2b64fa3251ac5ff4b4d174f1f0be7226490dce87 - Adding blockfilters to the REST interface is analogous to serving other public data such as transactions or blocks.
Tree-SHA512: d487bc694266375c94d6fcf2e9d788a8a42a3b94e8d3290e46335a64cbcde55084ce5ea6119b79a4065888d94d7c3ae25a59a901fa46e3711f0eb296add12696
