bd93fc9945bfd4be117990c5d861f61ddd451f96 Fix change detection of imported internal descriptors (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Import internal descriptors were having address book entries added which meant they would be detected as non-change. Fix this and add a test for it.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK bd93fc9945bfd4be117990c5d861f61ddd451f96
meshcollider:
utACK bd93fc9945bfd4be117990c5d861f61ddd451f96
promag:
Code review ACK bd93fc9945bfd4be117990c5d861f61ddd451f96.
Tree-SHA512: 8fa9e364be317627ec171eedffdb505976c0e7f1e55bc7e8cfdffa3aeea5db24d231f55166602cd0e97a5ba621acc871de0a765c75d0c65678f83e93c3b657c5
f1f433e8ca014f69925e8d5487877e06ca784ec8 Make it easier to reason about node eviction by removing unused NodeEvictionCandidate::addr (CAddress) (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Make it easier to reason about node eviction by removing unused `NodeEvictionCandidate::addr` (`CAddress`).
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK f1f433e8ca014f69925e8d5487877e06ca784ec8
Tree-SHA512: fef91d7b412b8a4f172370cff6c37eb8c3db0ba618f5daf2dcc8737c8fcef7b9b820d7ee99cd0a9eae7dd653a096cf83d5113776b0d1d9a324147581674e9ede
d7901ab8d2fdd2f6e68c4fa48078111bf5f0fa73 fuzz: Assert expected DecodeHexTx behaviour when using legacy decoding (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Assert expected `DecodeHexTx` behaviour when using legacy decoding.
As suggested by MarcoFalke in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20290#issuecomment-720989597.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK d7901ab8d2fdd2f6e68c4fa48078111bf5f0fa73
Tree-SHA512: 3285680059e6fa73b0fb2c52b775f6319de1ac616f731206662b742764dc888cdfd1ac1f1fcfdfd5418d2006475a852d1c1a56a7035f772f0a6b2a84f5de93bc
58cfbc38e040925b51cb8d35d23b50e9cf06fb2a Ignoring (but warn) on duplicate -wallet parameters (Jonas Schnelli)
Pull request description:
I expect that there are many users with load on startup wallet definitions in `bitcoin.conf` or via startup CLI argument.
With the new `settings.json` r/w configuration file, users unloading and loading a wallet through the GUI or via the RPC calls might end up with a duplicate `-wallet` entry (one that still remains in bitcoin.conf or CLI) plus the new duplication in `settings.json` due to the unload/load.
Steps to reproduce
* create wallet (if via RPC set `load_on_startup` or unloadwallet/loadwallet then set `load_on_startup`).
* stop bitcoin
* start bitcoind again with same `--wallet=mywallet`
I guess it is acceptable to skip duplicates.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
Tested ACK 58cfbc38e040925b51cb8d35d23b50e9cf06fb2a
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 58cfbc38e040925b51cb8d35d23b50e9cf06fb2a
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 58cfbc38e040925b51cb8d35d23b50e9cf06fb2a. Changes since previous review: rebased, tweaked warning message, squashed/fixed test
Tree-SHA512: f94e5a999bdd7dc291f0bc142911b0a8033929350d6f6a35b58c4a06a3c8f83147be0f0c402d4e946dedbbcc85b7e023b672c731b6d7a8984d4780017c961cfb
5cafe2b25c1d2f6825b3c8103c280020929dd645 fuzz: Add missing ECC_Start to descriptor_parse test (Ivan Metlushko)
Pull request description:
Fixes fuzzing harness.
I also observed that the corpus for this test consists only of `xprv...` keys while we are using regtest parameters. So for proper fuzzing we need either A) to update the corpus and replace `xprv...` with `tprv...` B) switch to main net in the test
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 5cafe2b25c1d2f6825b3c8103c280020929dd645
practicalswift:
Tested ACK 5cafe2b25c1d2f6825b3c8103c280020929dd645
Tree-SHA512: 7415a98a445ce0f96219637d2362fecfc1191ad104f55d79ca92b0c92cde165e00646be5bf3fda956385e3cb22540eca457e575048493367cdf0e00a27d7cdb8
nWalletMaxVersion was used to allow an upgrade to a version only
when the new feature was used. This makes sense for the old
-upgradewallet startup option. But because upgradewallet is now a RPC,
putting off the version bump like this does not make sense. Instead,
immediately upgrading to the given version number makes sense.
Instead of using CanSupportFeature and relying on nWalletMaxVersion,
take the new version we are upgrading to and use IsSupportedFeature
with that and the previous wallet version.
af3b0dfc5463c42fb9bff39f020fc1728ed44bc7 net: fix output of peer address in version message (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
If `-logips -debug=net` is specified then we print the contents of the
version message we send to the peer, including his address. Because the
addresses in the version message use pre-BIP155 encoding they cannot
represent a Tor v3 address and we would actually send 16 `0`s instead (a
dummy IPv6 address). However we would print the full address in the log
message. Before this fix:
```
2020-10-21T12:24:17Z send version message: version 70016, blocks=653500, us=[::]:0, them=xwjtp3mj427zdp4tljiiivg2l5ijfvmt5lcsfaygtpp6cw254kykvpyd.onion:8333, peer=0
```
This is confusing because we pretend to send one thing while we actually
send another. Adjust the printout to reflect what we are sending. After
this fix:
```
2020-10-21T12:26:54Z send version message: version 70016, blocks=653500, us=[::]:0, them=[::]:0, peer=0
```
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK af3b0dfc5463c42fb9bff39f020fc1728ed44bc7
jnewbery:
utACK af3b0dfc5463c42fb9bff39f020fc1728ed44bc7
Tree-SHA512: f169d7b4f07c219e541f7c37ea23b82c77e50085fc72ec62f1dd46970389916e177268d07d45c7be94dd209d1903f8f23eaff62b7fa782f6057dd36bb96bba82
fa3967efdb07f1d22372f4ee2e602ea1fad04a57 test: Replace ARRAYLEN with C++11 ranged for loop (MarcoFalke)
fafc5290538fde76c3780976f4b2c11dc9f24d19 test: Run AssetTest even if built --with-libs=no (MarcoFalke)
faf58ab139949ca35b33217d010b350c9a59c61d ci: Add --with-libs=no to one ci config (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
`script_assets_test` doesn't call libbitcoinconsensus, so it seems confusing to require it
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fa3967efdb07f1d22372f4ee2e602ea1fad04a57 - looks ok to me.
Tree-SHA512: 8744fef64c5d7dc19a0ef4ae9b3df5b3f356253bf000f12723064794c5e50df071824d436059985f1112d94c1b530b65cbeb6b8435114a91b195480620eafc59
0be29000c011dec0722481dbebb159873da6fa54 rpc: update conf_target helps for correctness/consistency (Jon Atack)
778b9be40667876c705e586849ea9c9e44cf451c wallet, rpc: fix send subtract_fee_from_outputs help (Jon Atack)
603c0050837ec65765208dd54dde354145fbe098 wallet: add rpc send explicit fee rate coverage (Jon Atack)
dd341e602d5160fc621c0299179b91403756b61d wallet: add sendtoaddress/sendmany explicit fee rate coverage (Jon Atack)
44e7bfa60313e4ae67da49e5ba4535038b71b453 wallet: add walletcreatefundedpsbt explicit fee rate coverage (Jon Atack)
6e1ea4273e52fdcd86c87628aa595c03a071ca8c test: refactor for walletcreatefundedpsbt fee rate coverage (Jon Atack)
3ac7b0c6f1c68e74a84d868a454f508bada6b09d wallet: fundrawtx fee rate coverage, fixup ParseConfirmTarget() (Jon Atack)
2d8eba8f8425a2515022d51f1f5b4911329fbf55 wallet: combine redundant bumpfee invalid params and args tests (Jon Atack)
1697a40b6f841a54ee0d9744ed7fd09034b0ddad wallet: improve bumpfee error/help, add explicit fee rate coverage (Jon Atack)
fc5721723d34f76f9e1ffd2e31f274ea6b22f894 wallet: fix SetFeeEstimateMode() error message (Jon Atack)
052427eef1c9da84c474c5161b1910d3328ef0da wallet, bugfix: fix bumpfee with explicit fee rate modes (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Follow-up to #11413 providing a base to build on for #19543:
- bugfix for `bumpfee` raising a JSON error with explicit feerates, fixes issue #20219
- adds explicit feerate test coverage for `bumpfee`, `fundrawtransaction`, `walletcreatefundedpsbt`, `send`, `sendtoaddress`, and `sendmany`
- improves a few related RPC error messages and `ParseConfirmTarget()` / error message
- fixes/improves the explicit fee rate information in the 6 RPC helps, of which 2 were also missing `conf_target` sat/B units
This provides a spec and regression coverage for the potential next step of a universal `sat/vB` feerate argument (see #19543), as well as immediate coverage and minimum fixes for 0.21.
ACKs for top commit:
kallewoof:
Concept/Tested ACK 0be29000c011dec0722481dbebb159873da6fa54
meshcollider:
Code review + functional test run ACK 0be29000c011dec0722481dbebb159873da6fa54
Tree-SHA512: efd965003e991cba51d4504e2940f06ab3d742e34022e96a673606b44fad85596aa03a8c1809f06df7ebcf21a38e18a891e54392fe3d6fb4d120bbe4ea0cf5e0
2ead31fb1b17c9b183a4b81f0ae4f48e5cf67d64 [wallet] Return object from upgradewallet RPC (Sishir Giri)
Pull request description:
Change the return type of upgradewallet to be an object for future extensibility.
Also return any error string returned from the `UpgradeWallet()` function.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 2ead31fb1b17c9b183a4b81f0ae4f48e5cf67d64
meshcollider:
Tested ACK 2ead31fb1b17c9b183a4b81f0ae4f48e5cf67d64
Tree-SHA512: bcc7432d2f35093ec2463ea19e894fa885b698c0e8d8e4bd2f979bd4d722cbfed53ec589d6280968917893c64649dc9e40800b8d854273b0f9a1380f51afbdb1
6866259fabd8580c92693703d80773428aca8175 net: Hardcoded seeds update for 0.21 (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
36e875b4c5f0812868e34beba7be4aa1f7a00773 contrib: Add new versions to makeseeds.py and update gitignore (RandyMcMillan)
Pull request description:
Stats:
```
IPv4 IPv6 Onion Pass
426728 59523 7900 Initial
426728 59523 7900 Skip entries with invalid address
426728 59523 7900 After removing duplicates
426727 59523 7900 Skip entries from suspicious hosts
123226 51785 7787 Enforce minimal number of blocks
121710 51322 7586 Require service bit 1
4706 1427 3749 Require minimum uptime
4124 1098 3681 Require a known and recent user agent
4033 1075 3681 Filter out hosts with multiple bitcoin ports
512 140 512 Look up ASNs and limit results per ASN and per net
```
I've credited RandyMcMillan for the first commit because of #20190.
There are at least enough onions this time! Number of IPv6 nodes that pass all the requirements seems similar to last time in #18506.
For the next major release we'll want TORv3 hardcoded peers as well. This makes no sense now as there are hardly any. But it'd make sense to think about how to collect them because they cannot come from the DNS seeds.
### Reviewing
```
2020-10-28 12:04:45 jnewbery wumpus: Do you have any suggestions for how to review #20237 ?
2020-10-28 12:28:37 wumpus jnewbery: previous PRs like it might be a guide there (#18506, #16999), e.g. people could try to repeat the last step in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/tree/master/contrib/seeds#seeds and see if it ends up with the same .h file, you could also repeat the entire process but as the list of peers from the seeder will be different every time that will give a (slightly, hopefully)
2020-10-28 12:28:37 wumpus different output
2020-10-28 12:49:40 wumpus testing what part of the peers are connectable is also useful
2020-10-28 12:51:05 wumpus or to go deeper, whether most part of the nodes are 'good nodes' and not say spy nodes, but i don't know what means of testing
```
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 6866259fabd8580c92693703d80773428aca8175
Tree-SHA512: 6b913ec92932de03304301a0cbf7b4a912ed09d890b019deeb449b8fa787c4994222368c6bf08b3c6e2bfa474442612e1c9de9327ec46ba59c37a5f38af50c75
c2cf8a18c25bf19ade51fedfa5c352bd7145edb0 fuzz: Check for addrv1 compatibility before using addrv1 serializer on CService (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Check for addrv1 compatibility before using addrv1 serializer/deserializer on `CService`:
Before this patch:
```
$ src/test/fuzz/service_deserialize
service_deserialize: test/fuzz/deserialize.cpp:85:
void (anonymous namespace)::AssertEqualAfterSerializeDeserialize(const T &, const int) [T = CService]:
Assertion `Deserialize<T>(Serialize(obj, version)) == obj' failed.
```
After this patch:
```
$ src/test/fuzz/service_deserialize
…
```
Related change: #20247
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK c2cf8a18c25bf19ade51fedfa5c352bd7145edb0
Tree-SHA512: dba6ddc60e8ef621011d844281461f1741de08c4af1a2b7156c810af44306cef7ec582de5974752db02ca085cfd23da0296d70b694e59ee262589d829fa0626e
16d9bfc4172b4f6ce24a3cd1a1cfa3933cd26751 Avoid test-before-evict evictions of current peers (Suhas Daftuar)
e8b215a086d91a8774210bb6ce8d1560aaaf0789 Refactor test for existing peer connection into own function (Suhas Daftuar)
4fe338ab3ed73b3ffb20eedf95500c56ec2920e1 Call CAddrMan::Good() on block-relay-only peer addresses (Suhas Daftuar)
daf55531260833d597ee599e2d289ea1be0b1d9c Avoid calling CAddrMan::Connected() on block-relay-only peer addresses (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
This PR does two things:
* Block-relay-only interaction with addrman.
* Calling `CAddrMan::Connected()` on an address that was a block-relay-only peer causes the time we report in `addr` messages containing that peer to be updated; particularly now that we use anchor connections with a our block-relay-only peers, this risks leaking information about those peers. So, stop this.
* Avoiding calling `CAddrMan::Good()` on block-relay-only peer addresses causes the addrman logic around maintaining the new and tried table to be less good, and in particular makes it so that block-relay-only peer addresses are more likely to be evicted from the addrman (for no good reason I can think of). So, mark those addresses as good when we connect.
* Fix test-before-evict bug. There's a bug where if we get a collision in the tried table with an existing address that is one of our current peers, and the connection is long-lived enough, then `SelectTriedCollisions()` might return that existing peer address to us as a test-before-evict connection candidate. However, our logic for new outbound connections would later prevent us from actually making a connection; the result would be that when we get a collision with a long-lived current peer, that peer's address is likely to get evicted from the tried table. Fix this by checking to see if a test-before-evict candidate is a peer we're currently connected to, and if so, mark it as `Good()`.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 16d9bfc4172b4f6ce24a3cd1a1cfa3933cd26751
amitiuttarwar:
code review ACK 16d9bfc417
mzumsande:
Code-Review ACK 16d9bfc4172b4f6ce24a3cd1a1cfa3933cd26751.
jnewbery:
utACK 16d9bfc4172b4f6ce24a3cd1a1cfa3933cd26751
ariard:
Code Review ACK 16d9bfc.
jonatack:
Tested ACK 16d9bfc4172b4f6ce24a3cd1a1cfa3933cd26751
Tree-SHA512: 188ccb814e436937cbb91d29d73c316ce83f4b9c22f1cda56747f0949a093e10161ae724e87e4a2d85ac40f85f5f6b4e87e97d350a1ac44f80c57783f4423324
fa90ba36d3f640ef2d559b69ae1ea99a73da6ac8 Update assumed chain params (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
> Oh, by the way, the same procedure as last year, Miss Sophie?
> Same procedure as every year, James.
See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/release-process.md#before-branch-off
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK fa90ba36d3f640ef2d559b69ae1ea99a73da6ac8 per `git diff fa0c1b5 fa90ba3` and re-running getblockheader/getblockhash/getchaintxstats on the signet chain
dergoegge:
ACK fa90ba36d3 - mainnet and testnet data matches my node.
theStack:
re-ACK fa90ba36d3f640ef2d559b69ae1ea99a73da6ac8 ✔️
darosior:
re-ACK fa90ba36d3f640ef2d559b69ae1ea99a73da6ac8 for mainnet and testnet.
Tree-SHA512: 83044cc59d9fc873cb29f13008d00b54cb4bb4646c1ca53ab4f429e7333a32402becb888d3be117d390c1297c2f7d083f77ae12ac8633265edceb3cfefac087f
3d0556d41087f945ed0a47a5d770076ad42ce432 Increase feature_taproot inactive test coverage (Pieter Wuille)
525cbd425e2f6a1dbd0febc53d7ada22cec4661f Only relay Taproot spends if next block has it active (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
There should be no change to mempool transaction behavior for witness v1 transactions as long as no activation is defined. Until that point, we should treat the consensus rules as under debate, and for soft-fork safety, that means spends should be treated as non-standard.
It's possible to go further: don't relay them unless the consensus rules are actually active for the next block. This extends non-relay to the period where a deployment is defined, started, locked in, or failed. I see no downsides to this, and the code change is very simple.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
utACK 3d0556d41087f945ed0a47a5d770076ad42ce432
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 3d0556d41087f945ed0a47a5d770076ad42ce432 🏓
jnewbery:
utACK 3d0556d41087f945ed0a47a5d770076ad42ce432
Tree-SHA512: ca625a2981716b4b44e8f3722718fd25fd04e25bf3ca1684924b8974fca49f7c1d438fdd9dcdfbc091a442002e20d441d42c41a0e2096e74a61068da6c60267a
fab94534b64593be1620c989bf69eb02e1be9b1b doc: Document that wallet salvage is experimental (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
See #20151
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK fab94534b64593be1620c989bf69eb02e1be9b1b: user safety first
hebasto:
ACK fab94534b64593be1620c989bf69eb02e1be9b1b, maybe capitalize into "WARNING"?
meshcollider:
Trivial ACK fab94534b64593be1620c989bf69eb02e1be9b1b
Tree-SHA512: 94912c491facc485293e4333066057933d706d84c7172f615296e7ba998c583c8bd07e751e6f00cd6576e7791007ace321f959181f7bf6a4e15e10d7ec8a1b7e
ad5cef5dfdd5802fc187a52e74d940a52f420a51 doc: Update data directory path comments (Hennadii Stepanov)
b19e88230f0e93e95e883e65376963cb9c36f606 util: Add StripRedundantLastElementsOfPath function (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Wallet names in `listwalletdir` RPC are correct now, even if the `-datadir` path has any number of trailing `/`.
This PR is an alternative to #19933.
Fixes #19928.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK ad5cef5dfd 🔙
promag:
Code review ACK ad5cef5dfdd5802fc187a52e74d940a52f420a51.
meshcollider:
Code review + test run ACK ad5cef5dfdd5802fc187a52e74d940a52f420a51
Tree-SHA512: bccabbd6c18243d48d15b2b27201cc0f5984623dcbc635c8740cf74523f359844c36eadd40391142874fcf452a43880bb6afbf89815ae736e499f9a98143a661
01476a88a6095fd3af71cb9bf1eadef920a1197b wallet: Make -wallet setting not create wallets (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This changes `-wallet` setting to only load existing wallets, not create new ones.
- Fixes settings.json corner cases reported by sjors & promag: https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/issues/95, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19754#issuecomment-685858578, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19754#issuecomment-685858578
- Prevents accidental creation of wallets reported most recently by jb55 http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2020-09-14.html#l-355
- Simplifies behavior after #15454. #15454 took the big step of disabling creation of the default wallet. This PR extends it to avoid creating other wallets as well. With this change, new wallets just aren't created on startup, instead of sometimes being created, sometimes not. #15454 release notes are updated here and are simpler.
This change should be targeted for 0.21.0. It's a bug fix and simplifies behavior of the #15937 / #19754 / #15454 features added in 0.21.0.
---
This PR is implementing the simplest, most basic alternative listed in https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/issues/95#issuecomment-694236940. Other improvements mentioned there can build on top of this.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 01476a88a6095fd3af71cb9bf1eadef920a1197b
hebasto:
re-ACK 01476a88a6095fd3af71cb9bf1eadef920a1197b
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 01476a88a6095fd3af71cb9bf1eadef920a1197b 🏂
Tree-SHA512: 0d50f4e5dfbd04a2efd9fd66c02085a0ed705807bdec1cf5770d0ae8cb6af07080fb81306349937bf66acdb713d03fb35636f6442b650d0820e66cbae09c2f87
6c0259fc2f8bd34ba83ad10a6a11d6d99e8d1fc7 Squashed 'src/secp256k1/' changes from c6b6b8f1bb..3967d96bf1 (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Nothing important changed, but this silences this (erroneous) warning in certain GCC 9 versions:
```
In file included from src/secp256k1.c:16:
src/ecmult_impl.h: In function ‘secp256k1_ecmult’:
src/ecmult_impl.h:496:48: warning: array subscript [1, 268435456] is outside array bounds of ‘struct secp256k1_strauss_point_state[1]’ [-Warray-bounds]
496 | secp256k1_gej tmp = a[state->ps[np].input_pos];
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
src/ecmult_impl.h:565:42: note: while referencing ‘ps’
565 | struct secp256k1_strauss_point_state ps[1];
| ^~
src/ecmult_impl.h:502:139: warning: array subscript [1, 268435456] is outside array bounds of ‘struct secp256k1_strauss_point_state[1]’ [-Warray-bounds]
502 | secp256k1_fe_mul(state->zr + np * ECMULT_TABLE_SIZE(WINDOW_A), state->zr + np * ECMULT_TABLE_SIZE(WINDOW_A), &(a[state->ps[np].input_pos].z));
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
src/ecmult_impl.h:565:42: note: while referencing ‘ps’
565 | struct secp256k1_strauss_point_state ps[1];
| ^~
```
(see https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/issues/834)
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 5803f5f5f6030e69b46a46f0511b8173bf89de0d - performed the update myself and got the same change: [check_20257_subtree](https://github.com/fanquake/bitcoin/tree/check_20257_subtree).
hebasto:
ACK 5803f5f5f6030e69b46a46f0511b8173bf89de0d, tested on Linux Mint 20 (x86_64) with `gcc (Ubuntu 9.3.0-17ubuntu1~20.04) 9.3.0` -- no warnings are emitted.
Tree-SHA512: 386281d23aee93a3b1d1a09fec8319c3a477e46967430c935677eed54abddc62d5a7710f9eeab1ec476ace05adcb194b5b377712e44a6bb95a74ffa35faf77f3
398045ba8b3694931069f88ec95553b3207dd1a6 cli -netinfo: print oversized/extreme ping times as "-" (Jon Atack)
773f4c99c00c0b1d8c1b53cb99ba571337100953 cli -netinfo: handle longer tor v3 local addresses (Jon Atack)
33e987452f869c279f2491499939e51e0af8364c cli -netinfo: make age column variable-width (Jon Atack)
f8a1c4d9469cb496fdafaf6f4d94977687df9190 cli -netinfo: various quick updates and fixes (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Quick fixups and updates for v0.21.0:
- [x] handle larger BIP155 `addrv2` addresses
- [x] add Signet chain
- [x] add an additional space between the `net` and `mping` columns; add missing `tinyformat` and `algorithm` headers
- [x] s/uptime/age/ per 0xB10C suggestion, and make the column auto-adjusting variable width
- [x] display `-` for oversized mping/ping times like `1.17348e+06`, as reported by practicalswift
Edit: removed the release note commit, as this PR was not merged before the notes were moved to the wiki. It's here:
```
- A new `bitcoin-cli -netinfo` command returns a network peer connections
dashboard that displays data from the `getpeerinfo` and `getnetworkinfo` RPCs
in a human-readable format. An optional integer argument from `0` to `4` may
be passed to see various levels of detail. (#19643)
```
ACKs for top commit:
michaelfolkson:
ACK 398045ba8b3694931069f88ec95553b3207dd1a6
Emzy:
Tested ACK 398045ba8b3694931069f88ec95553b3207dd1a6
Tree-SHA512: 0625ee840141bafbfcaf8f1fce53f8f850ae91721b2bdad4279372da87c18a1fe3a214d90bfdbbabdf6da38d58290d7dd0f1109b4e2ca5d20cacf417d6ced0f9
bbb42a68961a8ae1e4ef3221ffb1d5ff7272b075 RPC: createwallet: Nicer error message if descriptor wallet requested and sqlite support not compiled in (Luke Dashjr)
6608fec332eac4dfd91138bc4fe2e1b5c7bb758f GUI: Create Wallet: Nicely disable descriptor wallet checkbox if sqlite support not compiled in (Luke Dashjr)
7b54d768e1514b328e1ac108d3db2f1bac3ba7ff Make sqlite support optional (compile-time) (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
As a new requirement, sqlite support should be optional. This PR aims to be only minimum/blocker changes for 0.21.
Potential follow-up PRs after this:
* Make BDB support optional
* Nicer error messages when user tries to load an unsupported wallet
* Don't compile descriptor wallet code if sqlite disabled
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
Tested ACK bbb42a68961a8ae1e4ef3221ffb1d5ff7272b075
achow101:
ACK bbb42a68961a8ae1e4ef3221ffb1d5ff7272b075
Sjors:
re-utACK bbb42a68961a8ae1e4ef3221ffb1d5ff7272b075
hebasto:
ACK bbb42a68961a8ae1e4ef3221ffb1d5ff7272b075, tested on Linux Mint 20 (x86_64, Qt 5.12.8).
Tree-SHA512: 500209dd1971310fab8ae51543343ce0ba91f088ccccff6109b4cc27547cd5532289dca6cb7dac2a7d7c59cdf3c8f5aacc31e9b0f912e38cea52ec26b97100bd
