ac831339cbfa65b1f7576c53b5d9a94841db9868 doc: Fix some misspellings (randymcmillan)
Pull request description:
Here is a more thorough lint-spelling update.
This PR takes care of easy to fix spelling errors to clean up the linting stages.
There are misspellings coded into the functional tests.
That is a whole separate job within itself.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK ac831339cbfa65b1f7576c53b5d9a94841db9868 -- diff looks correct
Tree-SHA512: d8fad83fed083715655f148263ddeffc6752c8007d568fcf3dc2c418ccd5db70089ce3ccfd3994fcbd78043171402eb9cca5bdd5125287e22c42ea305aaa6e9d
f44abe4bed25a40145ab168adc1589f5df4146f3 refactor: Remove addrdb.h dependency from node.h (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
`node.h` includes `addrdb.h` just for the sake of `banmap_t` type.
This PR makes dependencies simpler and explicit.
~Also needless `typedef` has been removed from `enum BanReason`.~
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK f44abe4bed25a40145ab168adc1589f5df4146f3
practicalswift:
ACK f44abe4bed25a40145ab168adc1589f5df4146f3
Tree-SHA512: 33a1be20e5c629daf4a61ebbf93ea6494b9256887cebd4974de4782f6d324404b6cc84909533d9502b2cc19902083f1f9307d4fb7231e67db5b412b842d13072
3ed8e3d079a3860dcdf944f7c1aa37765a53da32 doc: Remove explicit network name references (Fabian Jahr)
d6e493f0c2850b522a676a005935163beddaa2cc wallet: Remove left-over BIP70 comment (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
A small follow-up to #17165 which removed BIP70 support.
1. Removes one leftover mention of BIP70 in a comment.
2. Removes BIP70 reference in comments on network/chain name strings. These can be removed as they are not really helpful and also incorrect: BIP70 only defines "main" and "test" but not "regtest". If/When signet gets merged we will add another name to the list that is not defined in BIP70. Mostly there is also an exhaustive list of the options included in the comment anyway.
If we would like to keep an identifier for this naming scheme, I would suggest switching to something more generic, like 'short chain name'. Happy to implement that if that is preferred. Alternatively, we could add a reference to `CBaseChainParams`. That would also mean we don't have to change these lines again for signet.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 3ed8e3d079a3860dcdf944f7c1aa37765a53da32
Tree-SHA512: 9a7c0b9cacbb67bd31a089ffdc6f1ebc7f336493e2c8266eb697da34dce2b505a431d5639a3e4fc34f9287361343e861b55dc2662e0a1d2095cc1046db77d6ee
a35b6824f3a0bdb68c5aef599c0f17562689970e Add assertion to randrange that input is not 0 (Jeremy Rubin)
Pull request description:
From the comment in randrange, their is an implicit argument that randrange cannot accept an argument of 0. If the argument is 0, then we have to return {}, which is not possible in a uint64_t.
The current code takes a very interesting approach, which is to return [0..std::numeric_limits<uint64_t>]. This can cause all sorts of fun problems, like allocating a lot of memory, accessing random memory (maybe with your private keys), and crashing the computer entirely.
This gives us three choices of how to make it "safe":
1) return Optional<uint64_t>
2) Change the return type to [0..range]
3) Return 0 if 0
4) Assert(range)
So which solution is best?
1) seems a bit overkill, as it makes any code using randrange worse.
2) Changing the return type as in 2 could be acceptable, but it imposes the potential overflow checking on the caller (which is what we want).
3) An interesting option -- effective makes the return type in {0} U [0..range]. But this is a bad choice, because it leads to code like `vec[randrange(vec.size())]`, which is incorrect for an empty vector. Null set should mean null set.
4) Assert(range) stands out as the best mitigation for now, with perhaps a future change to solution 2. It prevents the error from propagating at the earliest possible time, so the program crashes cleanly rather than by freezing the computer or accessing random memory.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
Seems reasonable for now, ACK a35b6824f3
laanwj:
ACK a35b6824f3a0bdb68c5aef599c0f17562689970e
promag:
ACK a35b6824f3a0bdb68c5aef599c0f17562689970e.
Tree-SHA512: 8fc626cde4b04b918100cb7af28753f25ec697bd077ce0e0c640be0357626322aeea233e3c8fd964ba1564b0fda830b7f5188310ebbb119c113513a4b89952dc
ScriptPubKeyMan is only using UnsetWalletFlagWithDB to unset the blank
wallet flag. Just make that it's own function and not expose the flag
writing directly.
This does not change behavior.
The default (i.e., generated by a compiler) copy constructor does the
same things.
Also this prevents -Wdeprecated-copy warning for implicitly declared
operator= in GCC 9.
b0c774b48a3198584e61429ef053844bdde2f9ae Add new mempool benchmarks for a complex pool (Jeremy Rubin)
Pull request description:
This PR is related to #17268.
It adds a mempool stress test which makes a really big complicated tx graph, and then, similar to mempool_eviction test, trims the size.
The test setup is to make 100 original transactions with Rand(10)+2 outputs each.
Then, 800 times:
we create a new transaction with Rand(10) + 1 parents that are randomly sampled from all existing transactions (with unspent outputs). From each such parent, we then select Rand(remaining outputs) +1 50% of the time, or 1 outputs 50% of the time.
Then, we trim the size to 3/4. Then we trim it to just a single transaction.
This creates, hopefully, a big bundle of transactions with lots of complex structure, that should really put a strain on the mempool graph algorithms.
This ends up testing both the descendant and ancestor tracking.
I don't love that the test is "unstable". That is, in order to compare this test to another, you really can't modify any of the internal state because it will have a different order of invocations of the deterministic randomness. However, it certainly suffices for comparing branches.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: cabe96b849b9885878e20eec558915e921d49e6ed1e4b011b22ca191b4c99aa28930a8b963784c9adf78cc8b034a655513f7a0da865e280a1214ae15ebb1d574
5710dadf9b282524fddf42c682351cd8022ed7bf test: fix script_p2sh_tests OP_PUSHBACK2/4 missing (kodslav)
Pull request description:
Cleans up #15140 which fixes commit 6b25f29a91 where opcodes were lost in translation.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
code review ACK 5710dadf9b282524fddf42c682351cd8022ed7bf
Tree-SHA512: 3f7fbcaf0dd199626d9ec9fdf3c5b5c5c2a91c4cfe81fae5b1d5662a48e52cf4bd27c94f8f42ebdfe7a076c5d600ada5661a6902b03eb5dc3dc953f4524345ac
8734c856f85cb506fa97596383dd7e7b9edd7e03 Replace the LogPrint function with a macro (Jeffrey Czyz)
Pull request description:
Calling `LogPrint` with a category that is not enabled results in
evaluating the remaining function arguments, which may be arbitrarily
complex (and possibly expensive) expressions. Defining `LogPrint` as a
macro prevents this unnecessary expression evaluation.
This is a partial revert of #14209. The decision to revert is discussed
in #16688, which adds verbose logging for validation event notification.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK 8734c856f85cb506fa97596383dd7e7b9edd7e03
Tree-SHA512: 19e995eaef0ff008a9f8c1fd6f3882f1fbf6794dd7e2dcf5c68056be787eee198d2956037d4ffba2b01e7658b47eba276cd7132feede78832373b3304203961e
fa0b3da36cd7cf0aada22f2d459296b81274c2f9 Squashed 'src/univalue/' changes from 7890db99d6..5a58a46671 (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Only change is a performance improvement. See https://github.com/bitcoin-core/univalue/pull/21#issue-333858474 and https://github.com/bitcoin-core/univalue/pull/15#issue-186748173
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK fa439e88af944082875e1fdb1cd8bb5a74b88b56
laanwj:
ACK fa439e88af944082875e1fdb1cd8bb5a74b88b56
Tree-SHA512: 35ea8f76ea4806182949c8eb5a8b652d1aaeec03ee023838e7cb29abcb81c61d59b38f15708564a78574722df57d13f61ef17d0f670a4056819705ef892321e0
a8b82867d544d221de00f6a0e26dbcc389326629 Fix incorrect help-debug for -checkpoints (Antoine Riard)
Pull request description:
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK a8b82867d544d221de00f6a0e26dbcc389326629 for improving the `-prune` help text.
MarcoFalke:
ACK a8b82867d544d221de00f6a0e26dbcc389326629
Tree-SHA512: 973fa97436be09a9939386dc00023420a7296a9e268356bf26aa06468f9f0d2c822205a4f1ce8f44a0562aa64ad90a43dec5697af656ef28ba6829e4e4360e94
9cae3d5e94f4481e0d251c924314e57187a07a60 tests: Add fuzzer initialization (hold ECCVerifyHandle) (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
The fuzzers `eval_script` and `script_flags` require holding `ECCVerifyHandle`.
This is a follow-up to #17235 which accidentally broke those two fuzzers.
Sorry about the temporary breakage my fuzzing friends: it took a while to fuzz before reaching these code paths. That's why this wasn't immediately caught. Sorry.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 67ebb155ba90894c07eac630e33f2f985c97bdf96dc751f312633414abeccdca20315d7d8f2ec4ee3ac810b666a1e44afb4ea8bc28165151cd51b623f816cac2
d314e8a818d4c162b1c7201533e6b600dcab2d91 refactor: Replace all uses of boost::optional with our own Optional type (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
Replace all uses of boost::optional with our own Optional type. Luckily, there aren't so many.
After this:
- `boost::optional` is no longer used directly (only through `Optional` which is an alias for it)
- `boost/optional.hpp` is only included in one place
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK d314e8a818d4c162b1c7201533e6b600dcab2d91
practicalswift:
ACK d314e8a818d4c162b1c7201533e6b600dcab2d91 -- diff looks correct + satisfying to see incremental progress towards the goal of a Boost free future :)
jtimon:
ACK d314e8a818d4c162b1c7201533e6b600dcab2d91
fanquake:
ACK d314e8a818d4c162b1c7201533e6b600dcab2d91
Tree-SHA512: b43e0017af81b07b5851377cd09624f114510ac5b9018d037664b58ad0fc8e893e30946b61f8f5e21e39125925bf9998a81f2226b468aab2df653ee57ed3213d
Instead of keeping pindexBestHeader set to the best header we've
ever seen, reset it back to our validated tip if we find an ancestor
of it turns out to be invalid. While the name is now a bit confusing,
this matches much better with how it is used in practice, see below.
Further, this opens up more use-cases for it in the future, namely
aggressively searching for new peers in case we have discovered
(possibly via some covert channel) headers which we do not know to be
invalid, but which we cannot find block data for.
Places pindexBestHeader is used:
* Various GUI displays of the best header and getblockchaininfo["headers"],
I don't think changing this is bad, and if anything this is less confusing
in the presence of an invalid block.
* IsCurrentForFeeEstimation(): If anything I think ensuring pindexBestHeader
isn't some crazy invalid chain is better than the alternative, even in the
case where you are rejecting the current chain due to hardware error (since
hopefully in that case you won't get any new blocks anyway).
* ConnectBlock assumevalid checks: We use pindexBestHeader to check that the
block we're connecting leads to something with nMinimumChainWork (preventing
a user-set assumevalid from having bogus work) and that the block we're
connecting leads to pindexBestHeader (I'm not too worried about this one -
it's nice to "disable" assumevalid if we have a long invalid headers chain,
but I don't see it as a critical protection).
* BlockRequestAllowed() uses pindexBestHeader as its target to ensure the
requested block is within a month of the "current chain". I don't think this
is a meaningful difference, if we're rejecting the current tip we're
trivially fingerprintable anyway, and if the chain really does have a bunch
of invalid crap near the tip, using the best not-invalid header is likely a
better criteria.
* ProcessGetBlockData uses pindexBestHeader as the "current chain" definition
of whether a block request is "historical" for the purpose of bandwidth
limiting. Similarly, I don't see why this is a meaningful change.
* We use pindexBestHeader for requesting missing headers on receipt of a
headers/compact block message or block inv as well as for initial getheaders.
I think this is definitely wrong, using the best not-invalid header for such
requests is much better.
* We use pindexBestHeader to define the "current chain" for deciding when
we're close to done with initial headers sync. I don't think this is a
meaningful change.
* We use pindexBestHeader to decide if initial headers sync has timed out. If
we're rejecting the chain due to hardware error this may result in
additional cases where we ban a peer, but this is already true, so I think
its fine.
3004d5a12d09d94bfc4dee2a8e8f2291996a4aaf [validation] Remove fMissingInputs from AcceptToMemoryPool() (John Newbery)
c428622a5bb1e37b2e6ab2c52791ac05d9271238 [validation] Remove unused first_invalid parameter from ProcessNewBlockHeaders() (John Newbery)
7204c6434b944f6ad51b3c895837729d3aa56eea [validation] Remove useless ret parameter from Invalid() (John Newbery)
1a37de4b3174d19a6d8691ae07e92b32fdfaef11 [validation] Remove error() calls from Invalid() calls (John Newbery)
067981e49246822421a7bcc720491427e1dba8a3 [validation] Tidy Up ValidationResult class (John Newbery)
a27a2957ed9afbe5a96caa5f0f4cbec730d27460 [validation] Add CValidationState subclasses (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Carries out some remaining tidy-ups remaining after PR 15141:
- split ValidationState into TxValidationState and BlockValidationState (commit from ajtowns)
- various minor code style tidy-ups to the ValidationState class
- remove the useless `ret` parameter from `ValidationState::Invalid()`
- remove the now unused `first_invalid` parameter from `ProcessNewBlockHeaders()`
- remove the `fMissingInputs` parameter from `AcceptToMemoryPool()`, and deal with missing inputs the same way as other errors by using the `TxValidationState` object.
Tip for reviewers (thanks ryanofsky!): The first commit ("[validation] Add CValidationState subclasses" ) is huge and can be easier to start reviewing if you revert the rote, mechanical changes:
Substitute the commit hash of commit "[validation] Add CValidationState subclasses" for <CommitHash> in the commands below.
```sh
git checkout <CommitHash>
git grep -l ValidationState | xargs sed -i 's/BlockValidationState\|TxValidationState/CValidationState/g'
git grep -l ValidationResult | xargs sed -i 's/BlockValidationResult\|TxValidationResult/ValidationInvalidReason/g'
git grep -l MaybePunish | xargs sed -i 's/MaybePunishNode\(ForBlock\|ForTx\)/MaybePunishNode/g'
git diff HEAD^
```
After that it's possible to easily see the mechanical changes with:
```sh
git log -p -n1 -U0 --word-diff-regex=. <CommitHash>
```
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 3004d5a12d09d94bfc4dee2a8e8f2291996a4aaf
amitiuttarwar:
code review ACK 3004d5a12d09d94bfc4dee2a8e8f2291996a4aaf. Also built & ran tests locally.
fjahr:
Code review ACK 3004d5a12d09d94bfc4dee2a8e8f2291996a4aaf . Only nit style change and pure virtual destructor added since my last review.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 3004d5a12d09d94bfc4dee2a8e8f2291996a4aaf. Just whitespace change and pure virtual destructor added since last review.
Tree-SHA512: 511de1fb380a18bec1944ea82b513b6192df632ee08bb16344a2df3c40811a88f3872f04df24bc93a41643c96c48f376a04551840fd804a961490d6c702c3d36
fa144e6fde1f546a952023af715032cb6789d948 rpc: Add generatetodescriptor (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The existing `generatetoaddress` RPC can only generate to scriptPubKeys that can be represented by an address. However, raw scripts (such as `OP_TRUE`) or P2PK can not be represented by an address, which complicates testing.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fa144e6fde1f546a952023af715032cb6789d948
Tree-SHA512: aee934ab7e33f07c81f3b4c8ec23e7b6ddf63a1f4b86051af0bd76b75d8da1f51627cc682e5c6e42582340ca576bbf8ff724bdd43f87128ccecfa91e52d30ae7
