fa9051642269f62f560af3f323fbf36cb7b58082 Switch scheduler to steady_clock (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
There is already `mockscheduler`, so it seems brittle, confusing and redundant to be able to mock the scheduler by adjusting the system clock.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK fa9051642269f62f560af3f323fbf36cb7b58082
w0xlt:
crACK fa90516422
Tree-SHA512: 60e99065ffb881a9fb25a346d311d99424fbc72a3b636c94b5f5c17ed6373c40f358a9b27825c518d12968c033e6cfd3c62d2b62cacdddc44a0b5b74f6c1a7ae
bdc6881e2f796f4a9a5873826219e24f17a96a7c wallet: Change log interval to use `steady_clock` (w0xlt)
Pull request description:
This refactors the log interval variables to use `steady_clock` as it is best suitable for measuring intervals.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
This makes sense. Code review ACK bdc6881e2f796f4a9a5873826219e24f17a96a7c
dunxen:
Code review ACK bdc6881
Tree-SHA512: 738b4aa45cef01df77102320f83096a0a7d0c63d7fcf098a8c0ab16b29453a87dc789c110105590e1e215d03499db1d889a94f336dcb385b6883c8364c9d39b7
9feb887082be911a8342f8090af4dca3db76db9b rpc: check `fopen` return code in dumptxoutset (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This change improves the usability of the `dumptxoutset` RPC in two ways, in the case that an invalid path is passed:
1. return from the RPC immediately, rather then when the file is first tried to be written (which is _after_ calculating the UTXO set hash)
2. return a proper return code and error message instead of the cryptic message that appears on master currently (see below)
master branch:
(error message appears after several minutes on my machine)
```
$ ./src/bitcoin-cli dumptxoutset /invalid/path
error code: -1
error message:
CAutoFile::operator<<: file handle is nullptr: unspecified iostream_category error
```
PR branch:
(error message appears immediately)
```
$ ./src/bitcoin-cli dumptxoutset /invalid/path
error code: -8
error message:
Couldn't open file /invalid/path.incomplete for writing.
```
ACKs for top commit:
w0xlt:
Code Review ACK 9feb887082
Tree-SHA512: e8695a7e86f26cc3b086d6bc6888388061f1dee439f76409b3ee11d35032bfd9cfa5349b728cd7f45bcffd999ecf9a6a991be172ce587b9b14503d9916b6e984
This change improves the usability of the `dumptxoutset` RPC in two ways,
in the case that an invalid path is passed:
1. return from the RPC immediately, rather then when the file is first
tried to be written (which is _after_ calculating the UTXO set hash)
2. return a proper return code and error message instead of the cryptic
"CAutoFile::operator<<: file handle is nullptr: unspecified
iostream_category error" (-1)
3258bad996262792ba77573d6080dafa3952929c changes color of skipped functional tests (Jacob P. Fickes)
Pull request description:
changes the color of skipped functional tests (currently grey and can be hard to read/invisible on dark backgrounds) to yellow.
resolves #24791
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
Tested ACK 3258bad996262792ba77573d6080dafa3952929c
jarolrod:
Tested ACK 3258bad996
Tree-SHA512: 3fe5ae0d3b4902b2b6bda6e89ab780feb8bf4b7cb1ce7e8467057b94a1e0a26ddeaf3cac0bc19b06ef10d8bccaac9c495029d42740fbedab8fb0d5fdd7d02eaf
fa4fb8d98b7e8e5ea2db35bf239fa7f248da5d8e random: Add FastRandomContext::rand_uniform_delay (MarcoFalke)
faa5c62967174f1dd66e8a4ba61ab29c867cf450 Add time helpers for std::chrono::steady_clock (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
A steady clock can be used in the future for the scheduler, for example.
A random uniform delay applied to a time point can be used in the future for time points passed to the scheduler, or delays in net processing.
Currently they are unused outside of tests, but if they turn out unused in the future (unlikely), they can trivially be removed again. I am splitting them out, so that several branches/pulls can build on top of them without duplicating the commits.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK fa4fb8d98b7e8e5ea2db35bf239fa7f248da5d8e
Tree-SHA512: 2c37174468fe84b1cdf2a032f458706df44b99a5f99062417bb42078b6f69e2f1738d20c21cd9386ca5a35f3bc0583e547ba40168c66f6aa42f700ba35dd95d4
92b35aba224ad4440f3ea6c01c841596a6a3d6f4 index, refactor: Change sync variables to use `std::chrono::steady_clock` (w0xlt)
Pull request description:
This PR refactors the sync variables to use `std::chrono::steady_clock` as it is best suitable for measuring intervals.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
utACK 92b35aba224ad4440f3ea6c01c841596a6a3d6f4
ajtowns:
ACK 92b35aba224ad4440f3ea6c01c841596a6a3d6f4 - code review only
Tree-SHA512: cd4bafde47b30beb88c0aac247e41b4dced2ff2845c67a7043619da058dcff4f84374a7c704a698f3055c888d076d25503c2f38ace8fbc5456f624e0efe1e188
f70ee34c71aeeb814fe65a69952343dccdb7b906 qt, refactor: Declare `WalletModel` member functions with `const` (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
After bitcoin/bitcoin#12830 the `WalletModel` class has two member functions: be7a5f2fc4/src/qt/walletmodel.h (L81) and be7a5f2fc4/src/qt/walletmodel.h (L154)
This PR drops the former one as redundant, and declares `WalletModel` member functions with the `const` qualifier where appropriate.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Code review ACK f70ee34c71aeeb814fe65a69952343dccdb7b906.
kristapsk:
cr ACK f70ee34c71aeeb814fe65a69952343dccdb7b906
w0xlt:
Code Review ACK f70ee34c71
Tree-SHA512: 43e6661822c667229ea860fb94c2e3154c33773dbd9fca1f6f76cc31c5875a1a0e8caa65ddfc20dec2a43e29e7b2469b3b6fa148fe7ec000ded518b4958b2b38
There are two reasons to perform this bump:
* Fixes #25082 by bumping to a commit that includes a fix for time-dependent unit
tests in libgit2 (f5fe0082abe4547f3fb9f29d8351473cfb3a387b).
* Gives us access to clang-toolchain-14 (14.0.3, 998eda3067c7d21e0d9bb3310d2f5a14b8f1c681),
which is useful for the Guix portion of #21778.
Note that with this bump:
Linux kernels headers update from 5.15.28 to 5.15.37.
15069130c6ca5273f3a593a404f60f11caa7d950 qt, test: Add tests for `tableView` in `AddressBookPage` dialog (Hennadii Stepanov)
edae3ab6999ee9e6efabd8403d31e9bd7c84f8a3 qt: No need to force Qt::QueuedConnection for NotifyAddressBookChanged (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR is a prerequisite for more thorough testing of filtering in the `AddressBookPage` class in context of bitcoin-core/gui#578 and bitcoin-core/gui#585.
Required for bitcoin-core/gui#592.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Code review ACK 15069130c6ca5273f3a593a404f60f11caa7d950.
Tree-SHA512: 86986d47606cbd54d813436c7afb21894e2200b6d3042a7aa0b5e84821c765bd68b14ad38a445069891ab33f2d7bcd4933b8373e14e9afb0c91f1a6ddf4da740
efae252f3072da598160670691757a0d60b9beb4 test: Remove extended lint (cppcheck) (laanwj)
Pull request description:
These are unreferenced in the CI and documentation, and have been since 2019 (see #17549).
I'm not sure the cppcheck is worthwhile. It takes a long time to run (I think this is why it isn't in the normal lints), and right
now it only appears to find implicit constructors. The list of exceptions is out of date. But if anyone wants to bring it back at any
time in the future they can do so from git history (and port it to Python).
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK efae252f3072da598160670691757a0d60b9beb4
Tree-SHA512: 1a770b5d20ff1199d0d6bc471ae3d2c3438f0f0b169ce8d2fe73480daf8d3a7146c066b799afc90aa7898982c5fee79c1daca10e16e2bff0a7b38850aedd55b2
These are unreferenced in the CI and documentation, and have been since
2019 (see #17549).
I'm not sure the cppcheck is worthwhile. It takes a long time
to run (I think this is why it isn't in the normal lints), and right
now it only appears to find implicit constructors. The list of
exceptions is out of date. But if anyone wants to bring it back at any
time in the future they can do so from git history (and port it to Python).
81c09ee45caecf8d9daf6766b94cebf54f3f08cd Unroll the ChaCha20 inner loop for performance (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Unrolling the inner ChaCha20 loop gives a ~15% speedup for me in the CHACHA20_* benchmarks. It's a simple change, this performance helps with RNG generation, and will matter more for BIP324.
ACKs for top commit:
martinus:
tested ACK 81c09ee with clang++ 13.0.1, test `CHACHA20_1MB`:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 81c09ee45caecf8d9daf6766b94cebf54f3f08cd 🍟
Tree-SHA512: 108bd0ba573bb08de92d611e7be7c09a2c2700f9655f44129b87f9b71f7e101dfc6bd345783e7b4b9b40f0b003913cf59187f422da8cdb5b20887f7855b2611a
fa32ced49cf651b48e0a9cc165e45a27505a461f doc: Shorten explanation of "maintainers" (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
GitHub has an extensive documentation about permissions ( https://docs.github.com/en/organizations/managing-access-to-your-organizations-repositories/repository-roles-for-an-organization#permissions-for-each-role ), so I don't think we should be trying to mirror them here.
Specifically, this pull makes three changes:
* Clarify that all "merge maintainers" can merge pull requests. Obviously, while GitHub users with the `Maintain` permission can not force push to protected branches, and GitHub users with the `Admin` permission can, I don't think this is worthy to mention in the contribution guidelines. During the whole time I was working on the project, I think this permission was only used once or twice, when I accidentally pushed an unsigned draft commit directly to `master`. See https://bitcoin-irc.chaincode.com/bitcoin-core-dev/2016-06-13#473584 . One could argue that there should be a list of maintainers in the doc. Though, as there is already a list of keys for verify-commits, this seems like unnecessary overhead.
* Clarify that the release process is executed collectively by the developers. For example, release process code changes that are reproducible can be done by anyone without permission. Also, detached signatures are created by several people (see for example https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-detached-sigs/commits/23.0), which (I believe) are also separate from the people that can push the binaries to the `bin` folder, which again are separate from the people who can release the snap/flatpak package.
* Clarify that moderation is also done collectively by people with `Triage`, `Write`, `Maintain`, and `Admin` permission. I think it is fine to refer to everyone in that group as "maintainers", or at least don't clarify it further, as any attempt at that would start to duplicate GitHub docs.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fa32ced49cf651b48e0a9cc165e45a27505a461f
prusnak:
Approach ACK fa32ced49cf651b48e0a9cc165e45a27505a461f
fanquake:
ACK fa32ced49cf651b48e0a9cc165e45a27505a461f
Tree-SHA512: ed87c2e538a32ff1611208a7262425160a4340a3112a1b2712d7e9a550fa191ddbebea0d8e45d3e578ead02d5ef17bddcaab3f6ee876f9018a5acbc65ffd0e1c
308dd2e93e92f4cac4e7d75478316af9bb2b77b8 Sanity assert GetAncestor() != nullptr where appropriate (Adam Jonas)
Pull request description:
Re-opening #17232. I have rebased the PR and addressed jonatack's nit suggestions.
Add sanity asserts for return value of `CBlockIndex::GetAncestor()` where appropriate.
In validation.cpp `CheckSequenceLocks`, check the return value of `tip->GetAncestor(maxInputHeight)` stored into `lp->maxInputBlock`. If it ever returns `nullptr` because the ancestor isn't found, it's going to be a bad bug to keep going, since a `LockPoints` object with the `maxInputBlock` member set to `nullptr` signifies no relative lock time.
In the other places, the added asserts would prevent accidental dereferencing of a null pointer which is undefined behavior.
Co-Authored-By: Adam Jonas <jonas@chaincode.com>
Co-Authored-By: danra <danra@users.noreply.github.com>
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 308dd2e93e92f4cac4e7d75478316af9bb2b77b8
Tree-SHA512: 5bfdaab1499607ae2c3cd3e2e9e8c37850bfd0e327e680f4e36c81f9c6d98a543af78ecfac1ab0e06325d264412615a04d52005875780c7db2a4d81bd2d2259a
dba123167236a172d2d33861d58aa94a19729671 test: previous releases: add v23.0 (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Follows the same pattern as d8b705f1caeb3b4a6790cb26e4e5584ca791d965 (v22.0) and 8a57a06a5062dd8dfdefca4e404d0ddbd2a3da1d (v0.21.0).
Starting from v23.0 there is a separate macOS release for x86_64 and aarch64.
ACKs for top commit:
prusnak:
Approach ACK dba123167236a172d2d33861d58aa94a19729671
Tree-SHA512: 249aeddd5e80e163578581e5c8e9b6579f3694abc3d1fb68dddb7b42d75021ad85266688ec4a365a6631d82a65a19873aff7ba61c0ea59d21f8adbe4b772dc16
fac6cfc50f65c610f2df9af3ec2efff5eade6661 refactor: Change * to & in MutableTransactionSignatureCreator (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The `MutableTransactionSignatureCreator` constructor takes in a pointer to a mutable transaction. This is problematic for several reasons:
* It would be undefined behaviour to pass in a nullptr because for signature creation, the memory of the mutable transaction is accessed
* No caller currently passes in a nullptr, so passing a reference as a pointer is confusing
Fix all issues by replacing `*` with `&` in `MutableTransactionSignatureCreator`
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
Code-review ACK fac6cfc50f65c610f2df9af3ec2efff5eade6661
jonatack:
ACK fac6cfc50f65c610f2df9af3ec2efff5eade6661
Tree-SHA512: d84296b030bd4fa2709e5adbfe43a5f8377d218957d844af69a819893252af671df7f00004f5ba601a0bd70f3c1c2e58c4f00e75684da663f28432bb5c89fb86
e4303c337c8423f21c2c72ee1bcca3aaf46fa1cb [unit test] prioritisation in mining (glozow)
7a8d60676bc0eec289687b2dfd5d2b00b83c0eaa [miner] bug fix: update for parent inclusion using modified fee (glozow)
0f9a44461c294cf21a335e8a8c13e498baac110f MOVEONLY: group miner tests into MinerTestingSetup functions (glozow)
Pull request description:
Came up while reviewing #24364, where some of us incorrectly assumed that we use the same fee deduction in `CTxMemPoolModifiedEntry::nModFeesWithAncestors` when first constructing an entry and in `update_for_parent_inclusion`.
Actually, the behavior is this: when a mempool entry's ancestor is included in the block template, we create a `CTxMemPoolModifiedEntry` for it, subtracting the ancestor's modified fees from `nModFeesWithAncestors`. If another ancestor is included, we update it again, but use the ancestor's _base_ fees instead.
I can't explain why we use `GetFee` in one place and `GetModifiedFee` in the other, but I'm quite certain we should be using the same one for both.
And should it be base or modified fees? Modified, otherwise the child inherits the prioritisation of the parent, but only until the parent gets mined. If we want prioritisation to cascade down to current in-mempool descendants, we should probably document that in the `prioritsetransaction` helpstring and implement it in `CTxMemPool::mapDeltas`, not as a quirk in the mining code?
Wrote a test in which a mempool entry has 2 ancestors, both prioritised, and both included in a block template individually. This test should fail without the s/GetFee/GetModifiedFee commit.
ACKs for top commit:
ccdle12:
tested ACK e4303c3
MarcoFalke:
ACK e4303c337c8423f21c2c72ee1bcca3aaf46fa1cb 🚗
Tree-SHA512: 4cd94106fbc9353e9f9b6d5af268ecda5aec7539245298c940ca220606dd0737264505bfaae1f83d94765cc2d9e1a6e913a765048fe6c19292482241761a6762
fa2deae2a86417d7e0d4cd33fb933b1000d20313 Wrap boost::replace_all (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
The included header is thousand lines of template code (not counting the recursive includes) for basically one function.
ACKs for top commit:
pk-b2:
ACK fa2deae2a8
seejee:
ACK fa2deae2a8
martinus:
ACK fa2deae2a86417d7e0d4cd33fb933b1000d20313. Next step, replace with custom implementation to get rid of another boost header?
Tree-SHA512: 176c2b97fb1d1fc35b63f2e2ee9b47304ff40f7a0b1431df4e4a30ee4c039c9e97d635b0a2b55c4494061735061700c8bf7e99412dc347d18bbce1db61e14909
