From d8bb8236eaaf5cfd8b82770898b9209c1cc01a5e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Greg Tonoski <111286121+GregTonoski@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 13:52:46 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] minor clarification

---
 Comments:BIP-0039.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Comments:BIP-0039.md b/Comments:BIP-0039.md
index 37bf18f..d4ba785 100644
--- a/Comments:BIP-0039.md
+++ b/Comments:BIP-0039.md
@@ -28,5 +28,5 @@ There are alternative binary-to-word encodings, e.g. PGP word list (a.k.a biomet
 # Inflexibility: entropy of 128, 160, 192, 224, 256 bit length limit is imposed instead of accepting any length (between 128-256).
 --Greg Tonoski, 2023-09-13
 
-# Complexity: SHA-256 calculation may be avoided and separated
+# Complexity: SHA-256 calculation may be avoided and/or separated (optional)
 Are there any benefits of SHA-256-derived checksum requirement? User ends up in the same situation if they input incorrect words - irrespectively of the checksum appended. Typing errors are not prevented. --Greg Tonoski, 2023-09-13
\ No newline at end of file