From d01683eb80cb8c8757029c984f73b840da6d3cb0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Greg Tonoski <111286121+GregTonoski@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 14:25:58 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Added comment: redundancy

---
 Comments:BIP-0039.md | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Comments:BIP-0039.md b/Comments:BIP-0039.md
index b9837ea..21f98c5 100644
--- a/Comments:BIP-0039.md
+++ b/Comments:BIP-0039.md
@@ -29,4 +29,7 @@ There are alternative binary-to-word encodings, e.g. PGP word list (a.k.a biomet
 --Greg Tonoski, 2023-09-13
 
 # Complexity: SHA-256 calculation may be avoided and/or separated (option)
-Are there any benefits of SHA-256-derived checksum requirement? User ends up in the same situation if they input incorrect words - irrespectively of the checksum appended. Typing errors are not prevented. --Greg Tonoski, 2023-09-13
\ No newline at end of file
+Are there any benefits of SHA-256-derived checksum requirement? User ends up in the same situation if they input incorrect words - irrespectively of the checksum appended. Typing errors are not prevented. --Greg Tonoski, 2023-09-13
+
+# Redundancy: key generation technique
+Key generation techniques may vary and co-exist. They are not dependent on Bitcoin protocol and vice-versa. While there are benefits of interoperability (e.g. standardized format of keys), the key generation techniques (e.g. PBKDF2, "The iteration count is set to 2048", source of randomness) may be treated separately and individually.
\ No newline at end of file