From ce049fe8cd7c1ec35907f7c0acf961095cbb5712 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Folkson Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 12:41:08 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Updated BIP Process wishlist (markdown) --- BIP-Process-wishlist.md | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/BIP-Process-wishlist.md b/BIP-Process-wishlist.md index e9e41e4..9c1bf39 100644 --- a/BIP-Process-wishlist.md +++ b/BIP-Process-wishlist.md @@ -32,5 +32,7 @@ What I'm concerned about is a future scenario where a malicious party (e.g Mallo I am also not sure on this process that BIP authors get to merge whatever they want (potentially downright inaccuracies) into potential soft fork BIPs without review of other subject matter experts. But that would be a bigger change and I'd need to give it more thought. +It is good if we get a second BIP maintainer. To ask Luke to merge in activation parameters that aren't exactly the same activation parameters as the ones in a release he is contributing to is not fair on Luke. +