From 9ec545217194490dd90bd57b32e1f2f54d655de2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Voskuil Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 16:02:23 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] Fix typos. --- Comments:BIP-0090.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Comments:BIP-0090.md b/Comments:BIP-0090.md index d086f9a..e182442 100644 --- a/Comments:BIP-0090.md +++ b/Comments:BIP-0090.md @@ -6,6 +6,6 @@ This is actually the opposite of [technical debt](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ The development work was already complete and working in all functional implementations of Bitcoin. This change on the other hand is a regression to simpler-to-code yet clearly imperfect implementation - "used instead of [retaining] the best overall solution". Ironically it also creates **more** work for core Bitcoin developers at this point. -It would also be incorrect to consider it a material performance optimization (the true target of this fork). While certain implementations may fail to cache the small amount of necessary block version history, that deficiency is not inherent in the consensus rules affected by this proposal. In that sense this is a shortcut in place of, "applying the best overall solution" - on other works, it creates technical debt. +It would also be incorrect to consider it a material performance optimization (the true target of this fork). While certain implementations may fail to cache the small amount of necessary block version history, that deficiency is not inherent in the consensus rules affected by this proposal. In that sense this is a shortcut in place of, "applying the best overall solution" - in other words, it creates technical debt. --Eric Voskuil, 2017-01-21 \ No newline at end of file