From 826dc9be64a04b7a446dc7e871c9e448b6bee710 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gregory Maxwell Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 23:44:34 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Updated Comments:BIP 0152 (markdown) --- Comments:BIP-0152.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Comments:BIP-0152.md b/Comments:BIP-0152.md index 726919e..32170fb 100644 --- a/Comments:BIP-0152.md +++ b/Comments:BIP-0152.md @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ implies that the Bitcoin P2P protocol generally requires that messages are handl --Eric Voskuil, 2017-01-21 -The protocol has strong requirements for ordering already, and has always had such a requirement. Moreover, no compact block messages will be sent until the a sendcmpact message has been processed; so there would not be ambiguity except in odd circumstances (described in the BIP). This proposal is v-ery well constructed, was extensively reviewed, and deployed and successfully used on an overwhelming supermajority of nodes on the network. +The protocol has strong requirements for ordering already, and has always had such a requirement. Moreover, no compact block messages will be sent until the a sendcmpact message has been processed; so there would not be ambiguity except in odd circumstances (described in the BIP). This proposal is very well constructed, was extensively reviewed, and deployed and successfully used on an overwhelming super-majority of nodes on the network. --Greg Maxwell, 2017-03-14 \ No newline at end of file