From 404f85550bd34657699355d05ffd3f2b83eabdfb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jonathan Cross Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 00:58:23 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Requesting clarification. --- Comments:BIP-0038.md | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Comments:BIP-0038.md b/Comments:BIP-0038.md index 82e6731..86c1265 100644 --- a/Comments:BIP-0038.md +++ b/Comments:BIP-0038.md @@ -1 +1,3 @@ -Designed for single-key "paper wallets", which are not a good idea in general. --Luke Dashjr, 2016-12-23 \ No newline at end of file +Designed for single-key "paper wallets", which are not a good idea in general. --Luke Dashjr, 2016-12-23 + +I assume you this is not meant as a general recommendation against "paper wallets", but rather paper wallets that consist of a single key? If so, is there an equivalent BIP (or discussion) on passphrase-protected HD paper wallets? --Jonathan Cross, 2017-01-17 \ No newline at end of file