From 1f2d46d15edf6c861c237be0396884ab54cd7259 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Folkson Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2023 14:19:04 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Updated BIP Process wishlist (markdown) --- BIP-Process-wishlist.md | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/BIP-Process-wishlist.md b/BIP-Process-wishlist.md index 3f94b3e..61130d5 100644 --- a/BIP-Process-wishlist.md +++ b/BIP-Process-wishlist.md @@ -71,3 +71,7 @@ BIP 340 didn't include a "Layer" in its header, presumably because none of the c ==Require a backward compatibility section for all BIPs?== Require at least a one liner saying "This proposal has no backward compatibility issues"? See: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1421#issuecomment-1442718400 + +==Recommend leaving deployment section blank in soft fork BIPs== + +How a proposed soft fork is deployed and ultimately activated is entirely orthogonal to what is contained in the soft fork. Until the soft fork BIP reaches a point where a deployment is planned the deployment section should be left blank so review can focus on the actual proposal.