mirror of
				https://github.com/bitcoin/bips.git
				synced 2025-11-03 14:19:40 +00:00 
			
		
		
		
	The PR implementing this BIP was never merged into Bitcoin Core, in favor of an alternative approach.
		
			
				
	
	
		
			116 lines
		
	
	
		
			5.8 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			116 lines
		
	
	
		
			5.8 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
<pre>
 | 
						|
  BIP: 338
 | 
						|
  Layer: Peer Services
 | 
						|
  Title: Disable transaction relay message
 | 
						|
  Author: Suhas Daftuar <sdaftuar@chaincode.com>
 | 
						|
  Comments-Summary: No comments yet.
 | 
						|
  Comments-URI: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/wiki/Comments:BIP-0338
 | 
						|
  Status: Withdrawn
 | 
						|
  Type: Standards Track
 | 
						|
  Created: 2020-09-03
 | 
						|
  License: BSD-2-Clause
 | 
						|
</pre>
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
==Abstract==
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
This BIP describes a change to the p2p protocol to allow a node to tell a peer
 | 
						|
that a connection will not be used for transaction relay, to support
 | 
						|
block-relay-only connections that are currently in use on the network.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
==Motivation==
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
This proposal is part of an effort to increase the number of inbound
 | 
						|
connections that a peer can service, by distinguishing peers which will not
 | 
						|
relay transactions from those that do.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Since 2019, software has been deployed[1] which initiates
 | 
						|
connections on the Bitcoin network and sets the transaction relay field
 | 
						|
(introduced by BIP 37 and also defined in BIP 60) to false, to prevent
 | 
						|
transaction relay from occurring on the connection. Additionally, addr messages
 | 
						|
received from the peer are ignored by this software.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
The purpose of these connections is two-fold: by making additional
 | 
						|
low-bandwidth connections on which blocks can propagate, the robustness of a
 | 
						|
node to network partitioning attacks is strengthened.  Additionally, by not
 | 
						|
relaying transactions and ignoring received addresses, the ability of an
 | 
						|
adversary to learn the complete network graph (or a subgraph) is reduced[2],
 | 
						|
which in turn increases the cost or difficulty to an attacker seeking to carry
 | 
						|
out a network partitioning attack (when compared with having such knowledge).
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
The low-bandwidth / minimal-resource nature of these connections is currently
 | 
						|
known only by the initiator of the connection; this is because the transaction
 | 
						|
relay field in the version message is not a permanent setting for the lifetime
 | 
						|
of the connection.  Consequently, a node receiving an inbound connection with
 | 
						|
transaction relay disabled cannot distinguish between a peer that will never
 | 
						|
enable transaction relay (as described in BIP 37) and one that will.  Moreover,
 | 
						|
the node also cannot determine that the incoming connection will ignore relayed
 | 
						|
addresses; with that knowledge a node would likely choose other peers to
 | 
						|
receive announced addresses instead.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
This proposal adds a new, optional message that a node can send a peer when
 | 
						|
initiating a connection to that peer, to indicate that connection should not be
 | 
						|
used for transaction relay for the connection's lifetime. In addition, without
 | 
						|
a current mechanism to negotiate whether addresses should be relayed on a
 | 
						|
connection, this BIP suggests that address messages not be sent on links where
 | 
						|
transaction relay has been disabled.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
After this BIP is deployed, nodes could more easily implement inbound
 | 
						|
connection limiting that differentiates low-resource nodes (such as those
 | 
						|
sending disabletx) from full-relay peers, potentially allowing for an increase
 | 
						|
in the number of block-relay-only connections that can be made on the network.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
==Specification==
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
# A new disabletx message is added, which is defined as an empty message with message type set to "disabletx".
 | 
						|
# The protocol version of nodes implementing this BIP must be set to 70017 or higher.
 | 
						|
# If a node sets the transaction relay field in the version message to a peer to false, then the disabletx message MAY also be sent in response to a version message from that peer if the peer's protocol version is >= 70017. If sent, the disabletx message MUST be sent prior to sending a verack.
 | 
						|
# A node MUST NOT send the disabletx message if the transaction relay field in the version message is omitted or set to true.
 | 
						|
# A node that has sent or received a disabletx message to/from a peer MUST NOT send any of these messages to the peer:
 | 
						|
## inv messages for transactions
 | 
						|
## notfound messages for transactions
 | 
						|
## getdata messages for transactions
 | 
						|
## getdata messages for merkleblock (BIP 37)
 | 
						|
## filteradd/filterload/filterclear (BIP 37)
 | 
						|
## feefilter (BIP 133)
 | 
						|
## mempool (BIP 35)
 | 
						|
## tx message
 | 
						|
# It is RECOMMENDED that a node that has sent or received a disabletx message to/from a peer not send any of these messages to the peer:
 | 
						|
## addr/getaddr
 | 
						|
## addrv2 (BIP 155)
 | 
						|
# The behavior regarding sending or processing other message types is not specified by this BIP.
 | 
						|
# Nodes MAY decide to not remain connected to peers that send this message (for example, if trying to find a peer that will relay transactions).
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
==Compatibility==
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Nodes with protocol version >= 70017 that do not implement this BIP, and nodes
 | 
						|
with protocol version < 70017, will continue to remain compatible with
 | 
						|
implementing software: transactions would not be relayed to peers sending the
 | 
						|
disabletx message (provided that BIP 37 or BIP 60 has been implemented), and while
 | 
						|
periodic address relay may still take place, software implementing this BIP
 | 
						|
should not be disconnecting such peers solely for that reason.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Disabling address relay is suggested but not required by this BIP, to allow for
 | 
						|
future protocol extensions that might specify more carefully how address relay
 | 
						|
is to be negotiated. This BIP's recommendations for software to not relay
 | 
						|
addresses is intended to be interpreted as guidance in the absence of any such
 | 
						|
future protocol extension, to accommodate existing software behavior.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Note that all messages specified in BIP 152, including blocktxn and
 | 
						|
getblocktxn, are permitted between peers that have sent/received a disabletx
 | 
						|
message, subject to the feature negotiation of BIP 152.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
This proposal is compatible with, but independent of, BIP 37.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
==Implementation==
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20726
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
==References==
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
# Bitcoin Core has [https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15759 implemented this functionality] since version 0.19.0.1, released in November 2019.
 | 
						|
# For example, see https://www.cs.umd.edu/projects/coinscope/coinscope.pdf and https://arxiv.org/pdf/1812.00942.pdf.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
==Copyright==
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
This BIP is licensed under the 2-clause BSD license.
 |