From d01e94118891e88b533fd2dfeff61b42df853dc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tim Ruffing Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 09:02:24 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] bip3: Don't call CC0 a license That's a bit of legal nitpicking, sorry. CC0 contains something like a public domain dedication along with a fallback license, so it's neither entirely. Some call it a "legal instrument". I prefer not calling it anything. --- bip-0003.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/bip-0003.md b/bip-0003.md index 32dcb801..1a42a7cd 100644 --- a/bip-0003.md +++ b/bip-0003.md @@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ For example, a preamble might include the following License header: License: CC0-1.0 OR FSFAP -In this case, the BIP text is fully licensed under both the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal license as well as the +In this case, the BIP text is made available under the terms of both Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal as well as the FSF All Permissive License, and anyone may modify and redistribute the text provided they comply with the terms of *either* license. In other words, the license list is an "OR choice", not an "AND also" requirement. See the [SPDX documentation](https://spdx.dev/ids/) and the [SPDX License List](https://spdx.org/licenses/) for further details.