mirror of
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips.git
synced 2026-05-25 17:09:34 +00:00
Merge pull request #1839 from jonatack/2025-04-collect-typo-fixups
Collect and curate typo fixups from April
This commit is contained in:
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ Fundamental disagreements and controversies are part of social
|
||||
systems, like the one defined as the human participants in the Bitcoin
|
||||
network. Without judging the motivation of the rule discrepancies or
|
||||
what rules were in place first, we're defining schism[1] hardforks as
|
||||
those in which - for whatever reason - users are consiously going to validate 2
|
||||
those in which - for whatever reason - users are consciously going to validate 2
|
||||
different sets of consensus rules. Since they will validate different
|
||||
rulesets, they will end up following 2 different chains for at least
|
||||
some time, maybe forever.
|
||||
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ One possible result observed in the past[non_proportional_inflatacoin_fork]
|
||||
is that one of the chains rapidly disappears, but nothing indicates
|
||||
that this must always be the case.
|
||||
|
||||
While 2 chains cohexist, they can be considered two different
|
||||
While 2 chains coexist, they can be considered two different
|
||||
currencies.
|
||||
We could say that bitcoin becomes bitcoinA and bitcoinB. The implications for market
|
||||
capitalization are completely unpredictable,
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user