bitcoin/bips
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/bitcoin/bips.git synced 2025-05-19 12:08:05 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

Small fix: 0xc1 is possible as first control block byte

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Pieter Wuille 2019-10-09 12:12:55 -07:00
parent e5888935ca
commit 9413cc1f07
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
bip-tapscript.mediawiki
View File

@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ The rules below only apply when validating a transaction input for which all of
* The transaction output is a '''segregated witness spend''' (i.e., the scriptPubKey is a witness program as defined in BIP141). * The transaction output is a '''segregated witness spend''' (i.e., the scriptPubKey is a witness program as defined in BIP141).
* It is a '''taproot spend''' as defined in bip-taproot (i.e., the witness version is 1, the witness program is 32 bytes, and it is not P2SH wrapped). * It is a '''taproot spend''' as defined in bip-taproot (i.e., the witness version is 1, the witness program is 32 bytes, and it is not P2SH wrapped).
* It is a '''script path spend''' as defined in bip-taproot (i.e., after removing the optional annex from the witness stack, two or more stack elements remain). * It is a '''script path spend''' as defined in bip-taproot (i.e., after removing the optional annex from the witness stack, two or more stack elements remain).
* The leaf version is ''0xc0'' (i.e. the first byte of the last witness element after removing the optional annex is ''0xc0'')<ref>'''How is the ''0xc0'' constant chosen?''' Following the guidelines in bip-taproot, by choosing a value having the two top bits set, tapscript spends are identifiable even without access to the UTXO being spent.</ref>, marking it as a '''tapscript spend'''. * The leaf version is ''0xc0'' (i.e. the first byte of the last witness element after removing the optional annex is ''0xc0'' or ''0xc1'')<ref>'''How is the ''0xc0'' constant chosen?''' Following the guidelines in bip-taproot, by choosing a value having the two top bits set, tapscript spends are identifiable even without access to the UTXO being spent.</ref>, marking it as a '''tapscript spend'''.
Validation of such inputs must be equivalent to performing the following steps in the specified order. Validation of such inputs must be equivalent to performing the following steps in the specified order.
# If the input is invalid due to BIP16, BIP141, or bip-taproot, fail. # If the input is invalid due to BIP16, BIP141, or bip-taproot, fail.